Status and accuracy of the Monte Carlo generators for luminosity measurements

  • The status and accuracy of the precision Monte Carlo generators used for luminosity measurements at flavour factories is reviewed. It is shown that, thanks to a considerable, long-term effort in tuned comparisons between the predictions of independent programs, as well as in the validation of the generators against the presently available calculations of the next-to-next-to-leading order QED corrections to Bhabha scattering, the theoretical accuracy reached by the most precise tools is of about one per mille. This error estimate is valid for realistic experimental cuts, appears to be quite robust and is already sufficient for very accurate luminosity measurements. However, recent progress and possible advances to further improve it are also discussed.

  • 加载中
  • [1] . Passera M, Marciano W J, Sirlin A. The muon g-2 discrepancy:new physics or a relatively light Higgs? arXiv:1001.4528 [hep-ph]. These Proceedings2. Teubner T et al. Update of g-2 of the muon and △#945;, arXiv:1001.5401 [hep-ph]. These Proceedings3. Actis S et al. Quest for precision in hadronic cross sectionsat low energy: Monte Carlo tools vs. experimental data,2009, arXiv: 0912.0749 [hep-ph], to appear in Eur. Phys.J. C4. Davier M. New results on the hadronic vacuum polarizationto the muon g-2, arXiv: 1001.2243 [hep-ph]. TheseProceedings5. Muller S E. Measurement of the pion form factor for M2#960;#960;between 0.1 and 0.85 GeV2 with the KLOE detector, arXiv:0912.2205 [hep-ex]. These Proceedings6. Ambrosino F et al (KLOE collaboration). Eur. Phys. J. C,2006, 47: 589; hep-ex/06040487. Dobbs S et al (CLEO collaboration). Phys. Rev. D, 2007,76: 112001; arXiv:0709.3783 [hep-ex]8. Asner D M et al. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 2009, 24, Issue: 1,arXiv: 0809.1869v1 [hep-ex]9. Fedotovich G V, Kuraev E A, Sibidanov A L. Monte Carlogenerator photon jets used for luminosity at e+e- colliders.These Proceedings10. Carloni Calame C M et al. Nucl. Phys. B, 2000, 584: 459;hep-ph/000326811. Carloni Calame C M. Phys. Lett. B, 2001, 520: 16; hep-ph/010311712. Carloni Calame C M, Montagna G, Nicrosini O, Piccinini F.Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 2004, 131: 48; hep-ph/031201413. Balossini G et al. Nucl. Phys. B, 2006, 758: 227; hep-ph/060718114. Balossini G et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2008, 663: 209; arXiv:0801.3360 [hep-ph]15. Arbuzov A B et al. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2006, 46: 689; hep-ph/050423316. Arbuzov A B et al. JHEP, 1997, 9710: 001; hep-ph/970226217. Jadach S, Placzek W, Ward B F L. Phys. Lett. B, 1997,390: 298; hep-ph/960841218. Czyz H et al. 2009, see [3]19. Actis S, Mastrolia P, Ossola G. Phys. Lett. B, 2010, 682:419; arXiv: 0909.1750 [hep-ph]20. Penin A A. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 95: 010408, hep-ph/0501120; Nucl. Phys. B, 2006, 734: 185, hep-ph/050812721. Bonciani R et al. Nucl. Phys. B, 2004, 701: 121,hep-ph/0405275; Nucl. Phys. B, 2005, 716: 280, hep-ph/041132122. Actis S et al. Nucl. Phys. B, 2007, 786: 26, arXiv:0704.2400v2 [hep-ph]23. Becher T, Melnikov K. JHEP, 2007, 06: 084, arXiv:0704.3582 [hep-ph]24. Bonciani R, Ferroglia A, Penin A A. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008,100: 131601, arXiv: 0710.4775 [hep-ph]25. Actis S et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100: 131602, arXiv:0711.3847 [hep-ph]26. Kuhn J H, Uccirati S. Nucl. Phys. B, 2009, 806: 300,arXiv:0807.1284 [hep-ph]27. Montagna G, Nicrosini O, Piccinini F. Phys. Lett. B, 1996,385: 348, hep-ph/960525228. Jadach S et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1996, 377: 168, hep-ph/960324829. Glosser C et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2005, 605: 123, hep-ph/040629830. Jadach S, Ward B F L, Yost S A. Phys. Rev. D, 2006, 73:073001, hep-ph/060219731. Jegerlehner F. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 2006, 162: 22,hep-ph/0608329; Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 2008, 181-182:135, arXiv: 0807.4206 [hep-ph]32. Hagiwara K et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2004, 69: 093003,hep-ph/0312250; Phys. Lett. B, 2007, 649: 173, hep-ph/061110233. Arbuzov A B et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1996, 383: 238, hepph/9605239; Jadach S Theoretical error of luminosity crosssectionat LEP, 2003, hep-ph/030608334. Jadach S. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 2005, 36: 2387, [arXiv:hep-ph/0506180]35. Carloni Calame C M et al. 2010, in preparation36. Actis S et al. 2010, in preparation
  • 加载中

Get Citation
Carloni Calame. Status and accuracy of the Monte Carlo generators for luminosity measurements[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 883-888. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/045
Carloni Calame. Status and accuracy of the Monte Carlo generators for luminosity measurements[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 883-888.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/045 shu
Milestone
Received: 2010-02-22
Revised: 2010-02-22
Article Metric

Article Views(2342)
PDF Downloads(440)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Status and accuracy of the Monte Carlo generators for luminosity measurements

Abstract: 

The status and accuracy of the precision Monte Carlo generators used for luminosity measurements at flavour factories is reviewed. It is shown that, thanks to a considerable, long-term effort in tuned comparisons between the predictions of independent programs, as well as in the validation of the generators against the presently available calculations of the next-to-next-to-leading order QED corrections to Bhabha scattering, the theoretical accuracy reached by the most precise tools is of about one per mille. This error estimate is valid for realistic experimental cuts, appears to be quite robust and is already sufficient for very accurate luminosity measurements. However, recent progress and possible advances to further improve it are also discussed.

    HTML

Reference (1)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return