Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2023 Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2022 2021 Impact Factor 2.944
Advanced Search
×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明：
（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部
2024年10月30日
Chinese Physics C> 2015, Vol. 39> Issue(11) : 114102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions

  • 1.

     School of Physics and Material Science, Thapar University, Patiala (Punjab)-147004, India

  • The static and energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potentials are simultaneously used along with the Wong formula for exploration of fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. The role of internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding pairs, such as inelastic surface vibrations, are examined within the context of coupled channel calculations performed using the code CCFULL. Theoretical calculations based on the static Woods-Saxon potential along with the one-dimensional Wong formula fail to address the fusion data of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Such discrepancies can be removed if one uses couplings to internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei. However, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) accurately describes the sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Therefore, in sub-barrier fusion dynamics, energy dependence in the nucleus-nucleus potential governs barrier modification effects in a closely similar way to that of the coupled channel approach.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中

  • References

    [1] Beckerman M. Rep. Prog. Phys., 1988, 51: 1047
    [2] Reisdorf W. J. Phys. G, 1994, 20: 1297
    [3] Dasgupta M et al. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 1998, 48: 401
    [4] Balantekin A B, Takigawa N. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1988, 70: 77
    [5] Canto L F et al. Phys. Rep., 2006, 424: 1
    [6] Hagino K, Takigawa N. Prog. Theor. Phys., 2012, 128: 1061
    [7] Back B B et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2014, 86: 317
    [8] Timmers H et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1997, 399: 35
    [9] Trotta M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 011601
    [10] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 014610
    [11] Leigh J R et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1995, 52: 3151
    [12] Prasad N V S V et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1996, 603: 176
    [13] ZHANG H Q et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054609
    [14] Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 064608
    [15] Sonzogni A A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 722
    [16] Dasso C H, Pollarolo G. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 68: 054604
    [17] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 67: 054603
    [18] Sagaidak R N et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 034605
    [19] WANG N, Scheid W. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 014607
    [20] Ghodsi O N, Gharaei R. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2012, 48: 21
    [21] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 1017
    [22] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 2012, 21: 1250054
    [23] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2011, 55: 649
    [24] Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Phys. At. Nucl., 2011, 74: 49
    [25] Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 024605
    [26] Hagino K, Rowley N. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 69: 054610
    [27] Mukherjee A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 75: 044608
    [28] Chushnyakova M V, Bhattacharya R, Gontchar I I. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 017603
    [29] Gontchar I I, Bhattacharya R, Chushnyakova M V. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 034601
    [30] Singh M, Duhan S S, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 2129
    [31] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 179
    [32] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 198
    [33] Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. AIP Conf. Proc., 2013, 1524: 163
    [34] Singh M, Sukhvinder, Kharab R, Atti Della ''Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi'' Anno LXV, 2010, 6: 751
    [35] Singh M, Phil M. Dissertation (2009) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
    [36] Singh M, Ph.D, Thesis, (2013) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, 2013
    [37] Singh M, Kharab R. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2014, 66: 03043
    [38] Gautam M S. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 024620
    [39] Gautam M S. Nucl. Phys. A, 2015, 933: 272
    [40] Gautam M S. Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 025301, Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 055301
    [41] Gautam M S. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2015, 30: 1550013; Acta Phys. Pol. B, 2015, 46: 1055; Can. J. Phys., 2015, 93: 1
    [42] Tripathi V et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 014614
    [43] Baby L T et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2000, 62: 014603
    [44] Sinha S et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 024607
    [45] Wong C Y. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1973, 31: 766
    [46] Hagino K, Rowley N, Kruppa A T. Comput. Phys. Commun., 1999, 123: 143
    [47] Hill D L, Wheeler J A. Phys. Rev., 1953, 89: 1102
    [48] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1997, 55: 276
    [49] Hagino K et al. J. Phys. G, 1997, 23: 1413
    [50] Esbensen H, Fricke S H, Landowne S. Phys. Rev. C, 1989, 40: 2046
    [51] Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 1349
    [52] Zamrun F M {et al.} Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 81: 044609
    [53] Anjos R M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1990, 42: 354
    [54] Ghodsi O N, Zanganeh V. Nucl. Phys. A, 2010, 846: 40
    [55] Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054621
    [56] Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 044606
    [57] Esbensen H, JIANG C L. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79: 064619
    [58] Esbensen H, Misicu S. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 054609
    [59] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 679: 95
    [60] Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2014, 728: 639

  • Access

    加载中

Get Citation
Manjeet Singh Gautam. Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102
Manjeet Singh Gautam. Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 114102.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102 shu
Milestone
Received: 2015-03-27
Fund

    Supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

Article Metric

Article Views(1493)
PDF Downloads(70)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions

    Corresponding author: Manjeet Singh Gautam,
  • 1. School of Physics and Material Science, Thapar University, Patiala (Punjab)-147004, India
  • Received Date: 2015-03-27
  • Available Online: 2015-11-20
Fund Project:  Supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

Abstract: The static and energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potentials are simultaneously used along with the Wong formula for exploration of fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. The role of internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding pairs, such as inelastic surface vibrations, are examined within the context of coupled channel calculations performed using the code CCFULL. Theoretical calculations based on the static Woods-Saxon potential along with the one-dimensional Wong formula fail to address the fusion data of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Such discrepancies can be removed if one uses couplings to internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei. However, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) accurately describes the sub-barrier fusion enhancement of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions. Therefore, in sub-barrier fusion dynamics, energy dependence in the nucleus-nucleus potential governs barrier modification effects in a closely similar way to that of the coupled channel approach.

    HTML

Reference (60)

目录

Link
IOPScience
SCOAP3
arXiv
Chinese Physical Society
Journal information
Introduction
Editorial Board
Others
Subscribe
Contact us
QQ: 1307685413
Tel: +86-010-88235947
Fax: +86-010-88233126
E-mail: cpc@ihep.ac.cn

  • CPC Website

  • IOP Website

  • CPC WeChat

Copyright © Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China 京ICP备05002789号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  E-mail: info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return