I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD

FU Zi-Wen

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/8/083101

Chinese Physics C> 2015, Vol. 39> Issue(8) : 083101 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/8/083101

I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD

FU Zi-Wen ^,

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Using a conventional constituent-quark model, I=1/2 scalar κ, vector K^*(892), and axial vector K₁ mesons are studied in the asqtad-improved staggered fermion with wall-source and point-sink interpolators. The mass ratio of m_κ/m_K^*(892) is numerically confirmed to apparently vary with quark mass, and the experimental ordering m_K^*(892) > m_κ holds elegantly when the light u/d quark masses are sufficiently small, while the valence strange quark mass is fixed to its physical value. We also get reasonable signals for the K₁ meson suggested by the SCALAR Collaboration from lattice QCD. The computations are conducted with the MILC N_f=3 flavor gauge configurations at three lattice spacings: a≈ 0.15, 0.12, and 0.09 fm.

References

[1]

Olive K et al. (Particle Data Group collaboration). Chin. Phys. C, 2014, 38: 090001[2] Bugg D. Phys. Rev. D, 2010, 81: 014002[3] Aitala M et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89: 121801; Ablikim M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2011, 698: 183; Ablikim M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2010, 693: 88[4] Alde D et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1997, 397: 350[5] Bonvicini G et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 78: 052001[6] Ablikim M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2006, 633: 681; Boito D, Escribano R, Jamin M. J. High Energy Phys., 2010, 1009: 031; Mitchell R et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2009, 79: 072008; Aubert B et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2007, 76: 012008[7] Bernard C et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2001, 64: 054506; Aubin C et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2004, 70: 094505[8] Aoki S et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2003, 67: 034503[9] Prelovsek S et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2013, 88: 054508[10] FU Z, FU K. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 86: 094507[11] Kunihiro T et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2004, 70: 034504[12] Wada H et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2007, 652: 250[13] Kunihiro T et al. EPJ Web Conf., 2010, 3: 03010[14] Nakamura A. eConf: C0402171[15] Sekiguchi M et al. Conf. Proc. C, 2011, 110613: 117[16] Nebreda J, Peláez J. Phys. Rev. D, 2010, 81: 054035[17] FU Zi-Wen, DeTar C. Chin. Phys. C, 2011, 35: 1079; FU Zi-Wen. Chin. Phys. C, 2012, 36: 489; FU Z. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 2013, 28: 1350059; FU Zi-Wen. Chin. Phys. C, 2014, 38, 063102[18] Aubin C et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2004, 70: 094505[19] Daum C et al. (ACCMOR collaboration). Nucl. Phys. B, 1981, 187: 1[20] Kunihiro T et al. PoS LATTICE, 2006, 2005: 034[21] Kunihiro T et al. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 2007, 38: 491[22] Beveren E, Rupp G. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2007, 31: 468[23] Golterman M. Nucl. Phys. B, 1986, 273: 663[24] Bernard C et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2007, 76: 094504; FU Z. J. High Energy Phys., 2012, 1207: 142; FU Zi-Wen, DeTar C. Chin. Phys. C, 2011, 35: 896; FU Zi-Wen. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28: 081202; FU Z. Phys. Rev. D, 2013, 87: 074501; FU Zi-Wen. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2012, 57: 78[25] Geng L S et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2007, 75: 014017[26] Bazavov A et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2010, 82: 1349[27] Bernard C et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 83: 034503[28] Aubin C et al. (MILC collaboration). Phys. Rev. D, 2004, 70: 114501[29] Jeltema T, Sher M. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, 61: 017301; Hanhart C, Pelaez J, Rios G. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100: 152001[30] Roca L, Oset E. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 054507[31] Alford M, Jaffe R. Nucl. Phys. B, 2000, 578: 367[32] Prelovsek S et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2010, 82: 094507; Prelovsek S, Mohler D. Phys. Rev. D, 2009, 79: 014503[33] Loan M, LUO Z, Lam Y. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2008, 57: 579[34] Alexandrou C et al. J. High Energy Phys., 2013, 1304: 137[35] Wagner M et al. (ETM collaboration). Acta Phys. Polon. Supp., 2013, 6(3): 847[36] GUO F et al. Phys. Rev. D, 2013, 88: 074506[37] Wagner M et al. (ETM collaboration). PoS LATTICE, 2014, 2013: 258; Abdel-Rehim A et al. arXiv: hep-lat/1410.8757[38] FU Z. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2012, 72: 2159; FU Zi-Wen. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2014, 61: 75[39] FU Z. J. High Energy Phys., 2012, 1201: 017; FU Z. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 014506; FU Z. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 074501

[1]	Jia Chen , Chunsheng An , Hong Chen . Mixing of the lowest-lying qqq configurations with J^P=1/2^- in different hyperfine interaction models. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(3): 034104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/3/034104
[2]	Wei Sun , Long-Cheng Gui , Ying Chen , Ming Gong , Chuan Liu , Yu-Bin Liu , Zhaofeng Liu , Jian-Ping Ma , Jian-Bo Zhang . Glueball spectrum from N_f=2 lattice QCD study on anisotropic lattices. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 093103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/093103
[3]	Hui Li , Zong-Xiu Wu , Chun-Sheng An , Hong Chen . Low-lying 1/2^- hidden strange pentaquark states in the constituent quark model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124104
[4]	CHEN Long-Bin , JIANG Jun , QIAO Cong-Feng . NLO QCD corrections to η_c+h_c(1P)/ψ_1,2(1D) production at B-factories. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(10): 103101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/10/103101
[5]	LIU Lang . Ab initio Monte Carlo shell model calculations for ⁷Li and ⁹Li low-lying spectra. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 064101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/064101
[6]	Hewa Y , Abu KASSIM . Low-lying states of ¹⁸⁴W and ¹⁸⁴Os nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(3): 034101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/034101
[7]	. Lowest-lying spin-1/2 and spin-3/2 baryon magnetic moments in chiral perturbation theory. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1307-1311. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/030
[8]	C. Alexandrou . Baryon structure from Lattice QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1093-1101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/008
[9]	Falih H. Al-Khudair . Low-lying states and isospin excitation in the Ge isotopes. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(7): 538-546. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/7/007
[10]	ZANG Jin-Fu , LÜ Li-Jun . Low-lying spectra and E2 transition rates in ^160-170Er isotopes in the interaction boson model. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 27-29. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/009
[11]	JIANG Jun-Qin , LI Jie-Ming . Calculation of the 0⁺⁺ Glueball Mass for 2+1 Dimensional QCD by Using the Improved Lattice Hamiltonian. Chinese Physics C, 2001, 25(10): 941-944.
[12]	LI Jie-Ming , JIANG Jun-Qin . Calculation of the Vacuum Wave Function for (2+1) Dimensional Lattice QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2001, 25(7): 617-620.
[13]	Zhang Zhanjun , Shi Zhuyi , Liu Yong , Sang Jianping . Microscopic Foundation of sdgIBM-2 and Study of Low-Lying States of ²⁴Mg. Chinese Physics C, 1998, 22(2): 169-175.
[14]	Xing Zheng , Chen Xingqu , Xu Shuwei . Studies of the Low-Lying States in ^{157, 159}Tm. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(S1): 93-100.
[15]	Chen Qizhou , Fang Xiyan , Guo Shouhong . Calculation of Vacuum State for 2+1-Dimensional SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S3): 265-272.
[16]	Zhang Dali , Liu Yuxin , Han Qizhi . An IBM2 Description on the Low-lying States of Even-even Xe Isotopes. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(12): 1130-1136.
[17]	ZHANG Jie , JIANG Da-Zhen , YANG Jin-Qing , ZHANG Ying-Ji , HE Jian-Hua , FU De-Ji , CHENG Xiao-Wu . Study of Low-Lying States in ^58,60,62,64Ni by (p,p′) Scattering at E_p=25.1MeV for 2+1 State and IBA Analysis for Spectra and B(E2) Ratios. Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(9): 836-843.
[18]	Huang Haixin , Wu Chongshi , Zeng Jinyan . Microscopic Analysis of the Low-Lying Even Parity Bands in ¹⁶⁸Er. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S2): 193-206.
[19]	YUE Rui-Hong . SOLUTION OF CHIRAL QCD₂ IN 1+1 DIMENSIONAL CURVED SPACETIME. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(5): 593-600.
[20]	Zheng Weihong , Liu Jinming , Guo Shuohong . The Mass Gap in 2 + 1 Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(S1): 51-54.

Access

Get Citation

FU Zi-Wen. I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/8/083101

FU Zi-Wen. I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/8/083101 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2014-12-05
Revised: 2015-02-05

Article Metric

Article Views(1683)
PDF Downloads(288)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD

Corresponding author: FU Zi-Wen,

Received Date: 2014-12-05

Accepted Date: 2015-02-05

Available Online: 2015-08-15

Abstract: Using a conventional constituent-quark model, I=1/2 scalar κ, vector K^*(892), and axial vector K₁ mesons are studied in the asqtad-improved staggered fermion with wall-source and point-sink interpolators. The mass ratio of m_κ/m_K^*(892) is numerically confirmed to apparently vary with quark mass, and the experimental ordering m_K^*(892) > m_κ holds elegantly when the light u/d quark masses are sufficiently small, while the valence strange quark mass is fixed to its physical value. We also get reasonable signals for the K₁ meson suggested by the SCALAR Collaboration from lattice QCD. The computations are conducted with the MILC N_f=3 flavor gauge configurations at three lattice spacings: a≈ 0.15, 0.12, and 0.09 fm.

HTML

Reference (1)

I=1/2 low-lying mesons in lattice QCD

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article