Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/GeneralPunctuation.js

Equation of state and chiral transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD with a more realistic gravitational background

  • We construct an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a cubic coupling term of the dilaton and the bulk scalar field. The background fields in this model are solved by the Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton potential, which has been shown to reproduce the equation of state from the lattice QCD with two flavors. The chiral transition behaviors are investigated in the improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with the solved gravitational background, and the crossover transition can be realized. Our study provides the possibility to address the deconfining and chiral phase transitions simultaneously in the bottom-up holographic framework.
  • In the standard model of particle physics, three generations of neutrinos, namely, νe,νμ , and ντ, are associated with three neutrino flavor eigenstates. The phenomenon of neutrino oscillation provides evidence that the neutrinos are massive [1, 2]. Neutrino mass constraints can be derived from various particle physics experiments; however, the precise value of the neutrino mass remains unclear to date. Among these measurements, the kinematics of tritium decay can provide an upper limit on the neutrino mass [3]. Neutrino oscillation provides an approach to exploring the splittings of the neutrino mass-squared Δmij. The resulting mass-squared splittings are [4]

    Δm221m22m217.5×105eV2,

    (1)

    |Δm231||m23m21|2.5×103eV2,

    (2)

    where m1,m2 , and m3 are neutrino mass eigenvalues that can be transformed into flavor eigenstates with a neutrino mixing matrix [4]. The sign of Δm231 remains undetermined; thus, the above results present two possibilities of neutrino mass hierarchy: the normal hierarchy (NH), characterized by m1<m2<m3 , and the inverted hierarchy (IH), characterized by m3<m1<m2. We denote the sum of the neutrino mass as mν. In the NH case, there is a lower limit on the total neutrino mass, which is mν,NH>0.06eV. Similarly, for the IH case, we have mν,IH>0.10eV.

    Cosmological observations can also provide constraints on neutrino mass, particularly the total neutrino mass mν [59]. In the early universe, massive neutrinos are ultra-relativistic, which can be regarded as radiation. However, in the late-time universe, massive neutrinos become non-relativistic and behave like cold dark matter. The special characteristic of massive neutrinos would have significant implications on cosmological evolution at both background and perturbation levels, consequently leading to a reshaping of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) power spectrum [1014]. To remain consistent with CMB observations, there is an upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses mν. Note that the inference of total neutrino mass constraints from the CMB is model-dependent. In concordance ΛCDM model, it is found that mν<0.26 eV at the 95% confidence level (C.L.) using Planck 2018 TT, TE, EE+lowE and assuming degeneracy hierarchy (m1=m2=m3), where lowE refers to low- (229) EE polarization power spectra [5]. Adding baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data results in a more stringent constraint mν<0.12 eV at the 95% C.L. The neutrino mass hierarchy can be distinguished through strict cosmological constraints derived from cosmological observations. Cosmological constraints on the neutrino mass hierarchy were first proposed in [15]. Subsequently, an updated constraint was derived using Planck 2018 TT, TE, and EE+lowE+BAO, yielding mν,NH< 0.15 eV and mν,IH< 0.17 eV at the 95% C.L. [16].

    The constraints on neutrino mass in alternative cosmological models beyond the standard ΛCDM model have been extensively investigated [1731]. The new physics in these models may impose distinct constraints on the neutrino mass compared to those derived from the ΛCDM model. In recent years, a multitude of cosmological models have been proposed to alleviate the Hubble tension [32, 33], which refers to the discrepancy between the local distance ladder measurement and the early-time CMB measurement. According to the CMB observations by Planck [34], H0=67.27±0.60 km s−1Mpc−1 in the ΛCDM model. However, the latest H0 measurement by SH0ES yields H0=73.04±1.04 km s−1Mpc−1 [35]. The discrepancy between these two results reaches a 5σ significance level. Therefore, the ΛCDM model may potentially exhibit inconsistencies; thus, we need to constrain the neutrino masses within a consistent cosmological framework. Early dark energy (EDE) is a promising solution to alleviate Hubble tension by increasing the Hubble rate H(z) prior to recombination. It reduces the sound horizon at recombination while increasing the H0 value without shifting the angular scale of the sound horizon. Because the CMB has tight constraints on the angular scale of the sound horizon, introducing EDE can increase the value of H0 without violating the fit to the CMB power spectrum. In recent years, several EDE models with different mechanisms have been proposed [3646], such as the axion-like EDE model (Axi-EDE) [37, 39] and the EDE model with an anti-de Sitter phase around recombination (AdS-EDE) [43]. In this study, we aim to constrain neutrino mass within the Axi-EDE and AdS-EDE models while investigating the preferred hierarchy based on current observational data.

    This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we introduce the datasets and methods for constraining neutrino mass. Models and their parameters are summarized in Sec. III. The results of parameter constraints and discussions are presented in Sec. IV. Finally, our conclusions are outlined in Sec. V.

    We use a combination of the following datasets to constrain the neutrino mass and other cosmological parameters:

    ● CMB

    CMB data include the Planck 2018 high- Plik likelihood of the TT power spectrum (302500), TE cross correlation power spectrum and EE power spectra (302000) [47], and low- TT and EE power spectrum (230) and lensing power spectra [48].

    ● SN Ia

    We use the data on the 1048 type Ia supernova in the redshift range 0.01<z<2.3 from Pantheon [49], which provides information on the distance modulus versus redshift for each supernova.

    ● BAO

    The BAO data include the rd/DV value of 6dFGS at zeff=0.15 [50], the DV/rd value of SDSS DR7 at zeff=0.15 [51], and DA/rd, Hrd at zeff= 0.38, 0.51, 0.61 from BOSS DR12 [52], where rd is the sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch,

    rd=zdcs(z)H(z)dz,

    (3)

    and cs(z) is the sound speed of the baryon-photon fluid. The angular diameter distance DA is given by

    DA(z)=11+zz0dzH(z).

    (4)

    Then, the definition of DV is

    DV(z)=[(1+z)2D2A(z)zH(z)]1/3.

    (5)

    H0 measurement

    Supernovae and H0 from the Equation of State of dark energy (SH0ES) are measured through a three-step local distance ladder, and the latest H0 measurement result is H0=73.04±1.04 km s−1Mpc−1 [35]. We adopt the Gaussian prior of H0 in our analysis.

    We perform Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling using the Python package cobaya [53], and the chains is considered converged if the Gelman-Rubin criterion [54] R1<0.05 is satisfied.

    It is argued that the activation of an axion-like scalar field ϕ around recombination can serve as EDE, potentially resolving the H0 tension [37]. This Axi-EDE can be described by the potential function

    V(ϕ)=m2f2[1cos(ϕ/f)]n,

    (6)

    where n is a phenomenological parameter. When n=1, m represents the axion mass and f denotes the axion decay constant. In the context of alleviating H0 tension, n is usually chosen to be 3. The field is frozen at an initial value owing to Hubble friction and rolls down the potential when the Hubble parameter decreases to a critical level. The field acts as an EDE component before recombination, leading to a reduction the sound horizon at recombination rs(z). When the field oscillates around the minimum, its equation of state changes to wn=(n1)/(n+1). Its energy density dilutes rapidly and hardly affects subsequent cosmological evolution. The fractional energy density of Axi-EDE is defined as fEDE(z)ρEDE(z)/ρtot(z), and the redshift at which fEDE(z) reaches its maximum is denoted as zc. For simplicity, we use fEDE to represent fEDE(zc). If m and f are given, fEDE and zc can be solved numerically. Thus, the Axi-EDE model has 3 additional parameters, namely, fEDE,zc and the initial field value ϕi. The robustness of the Axi-EDE model has been evaluated using various datasets [36, 5557].

    In [43], the author proposes an EDE model with an AdS phase around recombination to effectively drive the values of fEDE and H0 higher. In this model, the potential of the scalar field ϕ is

    V(ϕ)=V0(ϕ/MPl)2nVAdS,

    (7)

    where V0 is a constant, VAdS is the depth of the AdS well, and MPl=1/8πGN is the reduced Planck mass. The potential function behaves similarly to the Rock ’n’ Roll EDE model (RnR-EDE) [40] when the field is allowed to drop into an AdS phase and climb out of the potential well in the subsequent evolution. The AdS-EDE field is also initially frozen, and zc denotes the redshift at which the field begins rolling down. The AdS-EDE model also introduces three extra parameters, namely, V0,ϕi, and VAdS. These parameters are typically transformed to fEDE, ln(1+zc) , and αAdS. The relationship between αAdS and VAdS is VAdSαAdS[ρm(zc)+ρr(zc)], where ρm and ρr are the densities of matter and radiation, respectively. The AdS-EDE model requires a suitable selection of fEDE and ln(1+zc) parameters, i.e., VAdS and V0, to ensure the field does not escape the AdS potential well and prevent a collapsing universe, which is undesirable. This feature will result in a non-zero fEDE when constraining AdS-EDE with the CMB alone [58]. It has been shown that the H0 value inferred from AdS-EDE with fixed αAdS=3.79×104 significantly alleviates the tension [43, 5860]. Note that the constraints on αAdS may be different depending on the datasets used. Therefore, we consider αAdS as a free parameter in our analysis.

    It is commonly assumed that one neutrino has a mass of mν=0.06 eV and the other two neutrinos are massless in cosmological models [5]. We follow this assumption for both the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE base models. However, to constrain the neutrino mass in the NH or IH case, it is necessary to consider three massive neutrino cases in the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models. To investigate the inclination toward the NH or IH, we also use the neutrino mass hierarchy parameter defined as

    Δm3m1m1+m3.

    (8)

    With this parameter, we can integrate the NH and IH into a unified model, in which Δ>0 corresponds to the NH and Δ<0 represents the IH. Consequently, the ratio of probabilities between Δ>0 and Δ<0 can reflect the preference inclination. The neutrino masses can be expressed in terms of Δ [61]:

    m1=1Δ2|Δ||Δm231|,

    (9)

    m2=m21+Δm221,

    (10)

    m3=1+Δ2|Δ||Δm231|.

    (11)

    In addition to the 6 parameters in the ΛCDM model, the extra sampling parameters are {fEDE,log10ac,ϕi,mmin} for the NH or IH case in the νAxi-EDE model, whereas mν is a derived parameter. For the νAxi-EDE model with the Δ parameter, the extra sampling parameters are {fEDE,log10ac,ϕi,Δ}, whereas mmin and mν are derived parameters. For the NH or IH case in the νAdS-EDE model, the extra sampling parameters are {fEDE,ln(1+zc),αAdS,mmin}, whereas mν is a derived parameter. For the νAdS-EDE model with the parameter Δ, the extra sampling parameters are {fEDE,ln(1+zc),αAdS,Δ}, whereas mmin and mν are derived parameters. To calculate the theoretical prediction of observable quantities, we use modified versions of the class package for the νAxi-EDE [56] 1 and νAdS-EDE models 2.

    We use the getdist package [62] to plot the posterior distribution of cosmological parameters and analyze the best-fit parameters. The parameter constraints obtained from MCMC chains are summarized in Table 1. The combination dataset used for analysis is Planck+BAO+Pantheon+SH0ES. The corresponding best-fit values of χ2 are listed in the final line of the table. The one-dimensional posterior distributions of mmin and mν for the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models are shown in Fig. 1. In addition, Fig. 2 shows the posterior of the Δ parameter.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Mean values and 1σ constraints on the cosmological parameters in the base case, considering one massive neutrino, as well as the NH and IH cases of the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models. The upper limits of αAdS, mmin , and mν are at the 95% C.L.
    νAxi-EDEνAdS-EDE
    baseNHIHbaseNHIH
    log(1010As)3.068±0.0153.070+0.0150.0163.075±0.0163.068±0.0153.070±0.0153.075±0.015
    ns0.9885±0.00630.9898±0.00640.9908±0.00610.9849±0.00560.9854±0.00540.9871±0.0056
    Ωbh20.02284±0.000210.02285±0.000220.02285±0.000210.02303±0.000200.02305±0.000200.02310±0.00020
    Ωch20.1299±0.00330.1309+0.00320.00360.1315±0.00350.1284±0.00300.1286±0.00300.1293+0.00290.0032
    τreio0.0583+0.00690.00780.0589+0.00720.00820.0606+0.00710.00850.0565±0.00750.0573±0.00760.0589+0.00680.0078
    H0 [km s−1Mpc−1] 71.42+0.900.7971.51±0.8571.52±0.8571.04±0.7770.98±0.7470.95±0.76
    S80.838±0.0120.837±0.0130.835±0.0130.841±0.0130.840±0.0130.838±0.013
    fEDE0.109+0.0280.0220.119±0.0250.124+0.0260.0230.073±0.0180.087±0.0200.093±0.020
    log10ac3.64+0.130.203.63+0.120.0123.613+0.0840.014
    ln(1+zc)8.181+0.0950.118.34±0.108.335±0.094
    αAdS<0.000242<0.000138<0.000149
    mmin/ev<0.0429<0.0437<0.0363<0.0391
    mν/ev<0.152<0.178<0.135<0.167
    χ23868.83863.73865.83864.93858.53861.2
    DownLoad: CSV
    Show Table

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (color online) 1D posterior distribution of mmin and mν for the NH and IH cases in the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models. The gray dashed lines in the right panel represent the lower limits of mν in the NH case (0.06 eV) and IH case (0.1 eV).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (color online) 1D posterior distribution of the Δ parameter in the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models.

    Axion-like early dark energy (Axi-EDE): For the NH case of the νAxi-EDE model, mmin<0.0429 eV and mν<0.152 eV at the 95% C.L., whereas for the IH case, mmin<0.0437 eV and mν<0.178 eV at the 95% C.L. Moreover, the constraints on other parameters for the NH or IH case of the νAxi-EDE model exhibit negligible deviations from those in the base case. The NH and IH cases of the νAxi-EDE model exhibit a better fit to the observational datasets, as evidenced by their smaller χ2 values when compared to the base case. Furthermore, the fitting performance of the NH case is better than that of the IH case because Δχ2=χ2(νAxi-EDE, NH)χ2(νAxi-EDE, IH)=2.1.

    The marginalized probability densities p(Δ) for the NH and IH cases of the νAxi-EDE model with the parameter Δ are plotted in Fig. 2. We can then calculate these two probabilities:

    P(NH)P(Δ>0)=10p(Δ)dΔ,

    (12)

    and

    P(IH)P(Δ>0)=01p(Δ)dΔ.

    (13)

    The ratio of these two probabilities can be calculated as

    P(NH):P(IH)=2.11:1,

    (14)

    indicating that the NH is more favorable than the IH, which aligns with the aforementioned result of the Δχ2 value.

    Early dark energy with AdS phase (AdS-EDE): The constraints on the minimum neutrino mass in the νAdS-EDE model are mmin<0.0363 eV for the NH case and mmin<0.0391 eV for the IH case at the 95% C.L. The constraints on the total neutrino mass are mν<0.135 eV for the NH case and mν<0.167 eV for the IH case at the 95% C.L. The constraints on parameters other than neutrino parameters in the NH and IH cases of the νAdS-EDE model are not significantly different from those in the base case. Moreover, the NH and IH cases of the νAdS-EDE model fit better than the base case. The discrepancy between the χ2 values in the NH and IH cases is Δχ2=χ2(νAdS-EDE, NH)χ2(νAdS-EDE, IH)=2.7. Therefore, the NH case still provides a better fit than the IH case within the framework of νAdS-EDE.

    For the νAdS-EDE model with the parameter Δ, the ratio of P(NH) and P(IH) can be calculated from p(Δ) plotted in Fig. 2,

    P(NH):P(IH)=2.38:1.

    (15)

    It can be concluded that the NH is more favorable than the IH, which is consistent with the aforementioned result of the Δχ2 value. Comparing the constraints of the neutrino mass and the χ2 values of the above models, we find that the results are congruent. The stringency of the neutrino mass constraints depends on each specific model's characteristics; however, these constraints remain reliable for these two different EDE scenarios.

    In this study, we analyze the constraints on neutrino mass within consistent cosmological models, namely, the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models. In both models, we assume three massive neutrino mass eigenstates with NH and IH. Additionally, we use the hierarchy parameter Δ in our analysis to evaluate the preference between the NH and IH. We employ a combination of Planck + BAO + Pantheon + SH0ES measurements to constrain the parameters of these models.

    The resulting constraint on the minimum neutrino mass in the νAxi-EDE model with the NH is mmin<0.0429 eV at the 95% C.L., and the constraint on the sum of neutrino masses is mν<0.152 eV. For the νAxi-EDE model with the IH, the neutrino mass constraints are mmin<0.0437 eV and mν<0.178 eV both at the 95% C.L. The constraint on the minimum neutrino mass in the νAdS-EDE model with the NH is mmin<0.0363 eV at the 95% C.L., and the constraint on the sum of neutrino masses is mν<0.135 eV at the 95% C.L. In the case of νAdS-EDE with the IH, the constraints are mmin<0.0391 eV and mν<0.167 eV at the 95% C.L.

    Compared to the νAxi-EDE base model with only one massive neutrino and a total neutrino mass of mν= 0.06 eV, there is no apparent shift in the constraints on cosmological parameters in the νAxi-EDE models with NH or IH. The χ2 values of the νAxi-EDE model with the NH and IH are both smaller than that of the base case. Additionally, we find that the νAxi-EDE model with the NH fits better with the combination datasets compared to the other two cases. By integrating the probability distribution of the Δ parameter, we find P(NH):P(IH)=2.11:1 for νAxi-EDE, indicating a preference for the νAxi-EDE model with the NH over the IH. Similarly, there seems to be no significant deviation of the cosmological parameters in the νAdS-EDE model with the NH or IH compared to those in the base case. The χ2 values of both the NH and IH cases in the νAdS-EDE model are smaller than those in the base case. Furthermore, P(NH):P(IH)=2.38:1 indicates that the NH case of the νAdS-EDE model provides a better fit to the joint datasets compared to the IH case.

    By comparing the overall results of the νAxi-EDE and νAdS-EDE models, we find that different hierarchies of three massive neutrino eigenstates give similar results. Thus, it is proved that the parameter constraints of these two EDE models are consistent and reliable.

    1https://github.com/PoulinV/AxiCLASS

    2https://github.com/genye00/class_multiscf

    [1] M. A. Stephanov, Proceedings, 24th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2006): Tucson, USA, July 23-28, 2006, PoS LAT2006, 024 (2006), arXiv: hep-lat/0701002 [hep-lat]
    [2] Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., Nature, 443: 675 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0611014[hep-lat doi: 10.1038/nature05120
    [3] A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D, 85: 054503 (2012), arXiv:1111.1710[hep-lat
    [4] T. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 113: 082001 (2014), arXiv:1402.5175[hep-lat doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.082001
    [5] C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45: S1 (2000), arXiv:nuclth/0005064[nucl-th doi: 10.1016/S0146-6410(00)90011-5
    [6] J. Braun and H. Gies, JHEP, 06: 024 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602226[hep-ph
    [7] C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103: 052003 (2009), arXiv:0904.2700[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.052003
    [8] K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B, 591: 277 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310121[hep-ph
    [9] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 38: 1113 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9711200[hep-th doi: 10.1023/A:1026654312961
    [10] S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B, 428: 105 (1998), arXiv:hepth/9802109[hep-th
    [11] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2: 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150[hep-th doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2
    [12] M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers et al., JHEP, 05: 041 (2004), arXiv:hepth/0311270[hep-th
    [13] T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 113: 843 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412141[hep-th doi: 10.1143/PTP.113.843
    [14] T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 114: 1083 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507073[hepth doi: 10.1143/PTP.114.1083
    [15] L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B, 721: 79 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501218[hep-ph
    [16] J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 95: 261602 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501128[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.261602
    [17] G. F. de Teramond and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94: 201601 (2005), arXiv:hepth/0501022[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.201601
    [18] A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son et al., Phys. Rev. D, 74: 015005 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602229[hep-ph
    [19] C. Csaki and M. Reece, JHEP, 05: 062 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608266[hep-ph
    [20] A. Cherman, T. D. Cohen, and E. S. Werbos, Phys. Rev. C, 79: 045203 (2009), arXiv:0804.1096[hep-ph
    [21] T. Gherghetta, J. I. Kapusta, and T. M. Kelley, Phys. Rev. D, 79: 076003 (2009), arXiv:0902.1998[hep-ph
    [22] T. M. Kelley, S. P. Bartz, and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 016002 (2011), arXiv:1009.3009 [hep-ph
    [23] Y.-Q. Sui, Y.-L. Wu, Z.-F. Xie et al., Phys. Rev. D, 81: 014024 (2010), arXiv:0909.3887[hep-ph
    [24] Y.-Q. Sui, Y.-L. Wu, and Y.-B. Yang, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 065030 (2011), arXiv:1012.3518 [hep-ph
    [25] M. Fujita, K. Fukushima, T. Misumi et al., Phys. Rev. D, 80: 035001 (2009), arXiv:0903.2316[hep-ph
    [26] M. Fujita, T. Kikuchi, K. Fukushima et al., Phys. Rev. D, 81: 065024 (2010), arXiv:0911.2298[hep-ph
    [27] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D, 80: 094019 (2009), arXiv:0909.1534 [hep-ph
    [28] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, S. Nicotri et al., Eur. Phys. J. C, 72: 2096 (2012), arXiv:1112.4402[hep-ph
    [29] L.-X. Cui, Z. Fang, and Y.-L. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C, 76: 22 (2016), arXiv:1310.6487[hep-ph
    [30] L.-X. Cui, Z. Fang, and Y.-L. Wu, Chin. Phys. C, 40: 063101 (2016), arXiv:1404.0761[hep-ph
    [31] D. Li, M. Huang, and Q.-S. Yan, Eur. Phys. J. C, 73: 2615 (2013), arXiv:1206.2824[hep-th
    [32] D. Li and M. Huang, JHEP, 11: 088 (2013), arXiv:1303.6929[hep-ph
    [33] E. V. Shuryak, Quark gluon plasma. New discoveries at RHIC: A case of strongly interacting quark gluon plasma. Proceedings, RBRC Workshop, Brookhaven, Upton, USA, May 14-15, 2004, Nucl. Phys. A,750, 64 (2005), arXiv: hep-ph/0405066 [hep-ph]
    [34] S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch et al., Phys. Rept., 584: 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.8131[hep-ph doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001
    [35] M. J. Tannenbaum, Rept. Prog. Phys., 69: 2005 (2006), arXiv:nucl-ex/0603003[nucl-ex doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/7/R01
    [36] G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87: 081601 (2001), arXiv:hepth/0104066[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.081601
    [37] R.-G. Cai, Z.-Y. Nie, N. Ohta et al., Phys. Rev. D, 79: 066004 (2009), arXiv:0901.1421[hep-th
    [38] R.-G. Cai, Z.-Y. Nie, and Y.-W. Sun, Phys. Rev. D, 78: 126007 (2008), arXiv:0811.1665 [hep-th
    [39] S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B, 608: 265 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0407215[hep-th
    [40] E. Shuryak, S.-J. Sin, and I. Zahed, J. Korean Phys. Soc., 50: 384 (2007), arXiv:hepth/0511199[hep-th doi: 10.3938/jkps.50.384
    [41] H. Nastase, (2005), arXiv: hep-th/0501068[hep-th]
    [42] S. Nakamura and S.-J. Sin, JHEP, 09: 020 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0607123[hep-th
    [43] S.-J. Sin, S. Nakamura, and S. P. Kim, JHEP, 12: 075 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0610113[hep-th
    [44] R. A. Janik and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D, 73: 045013 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512162 [hep-th
    [45] C. P. Herzog, A. Karch, P. Kovtun et al., JHEP, 07: 013 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605158[hep-th
    [46] U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, JHEP, 02: 032 (2008), arXiv:0707.1324[hep-th
    [47] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, JHEP, 02: 019 (2008), arXiv:0707.1349[hep-th
    [48] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 181601 (2008), arXiv:0804.0899[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.181601
    [49] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti et al., JHEP, 05: 033 (2009), arXiv:0812.0792 [hep-th
    [50] D. Li, J. Liao, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 126006 (2014), arXiv:1401.2035[hep-ph
    [51] D. Li, S. He, and M. Huang, JHEP, 06: 046 (2015), arXiv:1411.5332[hep-ph
    [52] Z. Fang, D. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, Phys. Lett. B, 754: 343 (2016), arXiv:1602.00379[hep-ph
    [53] Z. Fang, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 074017 (2016), arXiv:1607.06197[hep-ph
    [54] Z. Fang, Phys. Lett. B, 758: 1 (2016)
    [55] N. Evans, C. Miller, and M. Scott, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 074034 (2016), arXiv:1604.06307[hepph
    [56] K. A. Mamo, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 041901 (2016), arXiv:1606.01598[hep-th
    [57] D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, JHEP, 04: 031 (2017), arXiv:1612.06248[hep-th
    [58] D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D, 97: 054035 (2018), arXiv:1802.02805[hep-th
    [59] A. Ballon-Bayona, M. Ihl, J. P. Shock et al., JHEP, 10: 038 (2017), arXiv:1706.05977 [hep-th
    [60] J. Chen, S. He, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 01: 165 (2019), arXiv:1810.07019[hep-ph
    [61] M. Attems, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos et al., JHEP, 10: 155 (2016), arXiv:1603.01254[hep-th
    [62] M. Attems, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos et al., JHEP, 06: 154 (2017), arXiv:1703.09681[hep-th
    [63] S. S. Gubser, (1999), arXiv: hep-th/9902155[hep-th]
    [64] I. H. Brevik, K. Ghoroku, and A. Nakamura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15: 57 (2006), arXiv:hepth/0505057[hep-th doi: 10.1142/S0218271806007651
    [65] A. Karch and E. Katz, JHEP, 06: 043 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205236[hep-th
    [66] M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers et al., JHEP, 07: 049 (2003), arXiv:hepth/0304032[hep-th
    [67] J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch et al., Eur. Phys. J. A, 35: 81 (2008), arXiv:0711.4467[hep-th
    [68] J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N. J. Evans et al., Phys. Rev. D, 69: 066007 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0306018[hep-th
    [69] K. Ghoroku and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B, 604: 235 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0408040[hep-th
    [70] S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys., 87: 577 (1983) doi: 10.1007/BF01208266
    [71] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2: 505 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803131[hepth doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a3
    [72] C. P. Herzog, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98: 091601 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0608151[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091601
    [73] S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 131601 (2008), arXiv:0804.1950[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.131601
    [74] S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, Phys. Rev. D, 78: 086007 (2008), arXiv:0804.0434[hep-th
    [75] S. S. Gubser, S. S. Pufu, and F. D. Rocha, JHEP, 08: 085 (2008), arXiv:0806.0407[hep-th
    [76] O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102: 212001 (2009), arXiv:0903.4375[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.212001
    [77] J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 81: 045011 (2010), arXiv:0910.1261[hep-th
    [78] S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 106008 (2014), arXiv:1311.6675[hep-th
    [79] S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 90: 115028 (2014), arXiv:1411.4330[hep-th
    [80] R. Yaresko and B. Kampfer, Phys. Lett. B, 747: 36 (2015), arXiv:1306.0214[hep-ph
    [81] R. Yaresko, J. Knaute, and B. Kämpfer, Eur. Phys. J. C, 75: 295 (2015), arXiv:1503.09065 [hep-ph
    [82] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 035015 (2011), arXiv:1008.3116 [hep-ph
    [83] D. Li, S. He, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 09: 041 (2011), arXiv:1103.5389[hep-th
    [84] S. He, S.-Y. Wu, Y. Yang et al., JHEP, 04: 093 (2013), arXiv:1301.0385[hep-th
    [85] Y. Yang and P.-H. Yuan, JHEP, 11: 149 (2014), arXiv:1406.1865[hep-th
    [86] Z. Fang, S. He, and D. Li, Nucl. Phys. B, 907: 187 (2016), arXiv:1512.04062[hep-ph
    [87] R. Rougemont, R. Critelli, J. Noronha-Hostler et al., Phys. Rev. D, 96: 014032 (2017), arXiv:1704.05558[hep-ph
    [88] Z. Li, Y. Chen, D. Li et al., Chin. Phys. C, 42: 013103 (2018), arXiv:1706.02238[hep-ph
    [89] R. Zöllner and B. Kämpfer, (2018), arXiv: 1807.04260[hep-th]
    [90] X. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, Chin. Phys. C, 43: 023105 (2019), arXiv:1810.02136[hep-ph
    [91] K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 04: 036 (2016), arXiv:1512.06493 [hep-ph
    [92] K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang et al., Phys. Rev. D, 93: 101901 (2016), arXiv:1511.02721[hep-ph
    [93] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B, 762: 86 (2016), arXiv:1604.02571[hep-ph
    [94] D. Li and M. Huang, JHEP, 02: 042 (2017), arXiv:1610.09814[hep-ph
    [95] S. P. Bartz and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. C, 97: 044908 (2018), arXiv:1801.00358[hep-ph
    [96] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 98: 114003 (2018), arXiv:1805.05019[hep-ph
    [97] S. P. Bartz and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 075022 (2016), arXiv:1607.05751[hep-ph
    [98] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 99: 034028 (2019), arXiv:1810.12525[hep-ph
    [99] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 100: 054008 (2019), arXiv:1904.04695[hepph
    [100] F. Burger, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. P. Lombardo et al., Phys. Rev. D, 91: 074504 (2015), arXiv:1412.6748[hep-lat
  • [1] M. A. Stephanov, Proceedings, 24th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2006): Tucson, USA, July 23-28, 2006, PoS LAT2006, 024 (2006), arXiv: hep-lat/0701002 [hep-lat]
    [2] Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., Nature, 443: 675 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0611014[hep-lat doi: 10.1038/nature05120
    [3] A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D, 85: 054503 (2012), arXiv:1111.1710[hep-lat
    [4] T. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 113: 082001 (2014), arXiv:1402.5175[hep-lat doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.082001
    [5] C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45: S1 (2000), arXiv:nuclth/0005064[nucl-th doi: 10.1016/S0146-6410(00)90011-5
    [6] J. Braun and H. Gies, JHEP, 06: 024 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602226[hep-ph
    [7] C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103: 052003 (2009), arXiv:0904.2700[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.052003
    [8] K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B, 591: 277 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310121[hep-ph
    [9] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 38: 1113 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9711200[hep-th doi: 10.1023/A:1026654312961
    [10] S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B, 428: 105 (1998), arXiv:hepth/9802109[hep-th
    [11] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2: 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150[hep-th doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2
    [12] M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers et al., JHEP, 05: 041 (2004), arXiv:hepth/0311270[hep-th
    [13] T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 113: 843 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412141[hep-th doi: 10.1143/PTP.113.843
    [14] T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 114: 1083 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507073[hepth doi: 10.1143/PTP.114.1083
    [15] L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B, 721: 79 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501218[hep-ph
    [16] J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 95: 261602 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501128[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.261602
    [17] G. F. de Teramond and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94: 201601 (2005), arXiv:hepth/0501022[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.201601
    [18] A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son et al., Phys. Rev. D, 74: 015005 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602229[hep-ph
    [19] C. Csaki and M. Reece, JHEP, 05: 062 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608266[hep-ph
    [20] A. Cherman, T. D. Cohen, and E. S. Werbos, Phys. Rev. C, 79: 045203 (2009), arXiv:0804.1096[hep-ph
    [21] T. Gherghetta, J. I. Kapusta, and T. M. Kelley, Phys. Rev. D, 79: 076003 (2009), arXiv:0902.1998[hep-ph
    [22] T. M. Kelley, S. P. Bartz, and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 016002 (2011), arXiv:1009.3009 [hep-ph
    [23] Y.-Q. Sui, Y.-L. Wu, Z.-F. Xie et al., Phys. Rev. D, 81: 014024 (2010), arXiv:0909.3887[hep-ph
    [24] Y.-Q. Sui, Y.-L. Wu, and Y.-B. Yang, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 065030 (2011), arXiv:1012.3518 [hep-ph
    [25] M. Fujita, K. Fukushima, T. Misumi et al., Phys. Rev. D, 80: 035001 (2009), arXiv:0903.2316[hep-ph
    [26] M. Fujita, T. Kikuchi, K. Fukushima et al., Phys. Rev. D, 81: 065024 (2010), arXiv:0911.2298[hep-ph
    [27] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D, 80: 094019 (2009), arXiv:0909.1534 [hep-ph
    [28] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, S. Nicotri et al., Eur. Phys. J. C, 72: 2096 (2012), arXiv:1112.4402[hep-ph
    [29] L.-X. Cui, Z. Fang, and Y.-L. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C, 76: 22 (2016), arXiv:1310.6487[hep-ph
    [30] L.-X. Cui, Z. Fang, and Y.-L. Wu, Chin. Phys. C, 40: 063101 (2016), arXiv:1404.0761[hep-ph
    [31] D. Li, M. Huang, and Q.-S. Yan, Eur. Phys. J. C, 73: 2615 (2013), arXiv:1206.2824[hep-th
    [32] D. Li and M. Huang, JHEP, 11: 088 (2013), arXiv:1303.6929[hep-ph
    [33] E. V. Shuryak, Quark gluon plasma. New discoveries at RHIC: A case of strongly interacting quark gluon plasma. Proceedings, RBRC Workshop, Brookhaven, Upton, USA, May 14-15, 2004, Nucl. Phys. A,750, 64 (2005), arXiv: hep-ph/0405066 [hep-ph]
    [34] S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch et al., Phys. Rept., 584: 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.8131[hep-ph doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001
    [35] M. J. Tannenbaum, Rept. Prog. Phys., 69: 2005 (2006), arXiv:nucl-ex/0603003[nucl-ex doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/7/R01
    [36] G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87: 081601 (2001), arXiv:hepth/0104066[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.081601
    [37] R.-G. Cai, Z.-Y. Nie, N. Ohta et al., Phys. Rev. D, 79: 066004 (2009), arXiv:0901.1421[hep-th
    [38] R.-G. Cai, Z.-Y. Nie, and Y.-W. Sun, Phys. Rev. D, 78: 126007 (2008), arXiv:0811.1665 [hep-th
    [39] S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B, 608: 265 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0407215[hep-th
    [40] E. Shuryak, S.-J. Sin, and I. Zahed, J. Korean Phys. Soc., 50: 384 (2007), arXiv:hepth/0511199[hep-th doi: 10.3938/jkps.50.384
    [41] H. Nastase, (2005), arXiv: hep-th/0501068[hep-th]
    [42] S. Nakamura and S.-J. Sin, JHEP, 09: 020 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0607123[hep-th
    [43] S.-J. Sin, S. Nakamura, and S. P. Kim, JHEP, 12: 075 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0610113[hep-th
    [44] R. A. Janik and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D, 73: 045013 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512162 [hep-th
    [45] C. P. Herzog, A. Karch, P. Kovtun et al., JHEP, 07: 013 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605158[hep-th
    [46] U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, JHEP, 02: 032 (2008), arXiv:0707.1324[hep-th
    [47] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, JHEP, 02: 019 (2008), arXiv:0707.1349[hep-th
    [48] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 181601 (2008), arXiv:0804.0899[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.181601
    [49] U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti et al., JHEP, 05: 033 (2009), arXiv:0812.0792 [hep-th
    [50] D. Li, J. Liao, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 126006 (2014), arXiv:1401.2035[hep-ph
    [51] D. Li, S. He, and M. Huang, JHEP, 06: 046 (2015), arXiv:1411.5332[hep-ph
    [52] Z. Fang, D. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, Phys. Lett. B, 754: 343 (2016), arXiv:1602.00379[hep-ph
    [53] Z. Fang, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 074017 (2016), arXiv:1607.06197[hep-ph
    [54] Z. Fang, Phys. Lett. B, 758: 1 (2016)
    [55] N. Evans, C. Miller, and M. Scott, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 074034 (2016), arXiv:1604.06307[hepph
    [56] K. A. Mamo, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 041901 (2016), arXiv:1606.01598[hep-th
    [57] D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, JHEP, 04: 031 (2017), arXiv:1612.06248[hep-th
    [58] D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D, 97: 054035 (2018), arXiv:1802.02805[hep-th
    [59] A. Ballon-Bayona, M. Ihl, J. P. Shock et al., JHEP, 10: 038 (2017), arXiv:1706.05977 [hep-th
    [60] J. Chen, S. He, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 01: 165 (2019), arXiv:1810.07019[hep-ph
    [61] M. Attems, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos et al., JHEP, 10: 155 (2016), arXiv:1603.01254[hep-th
    [62] M. Attems, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos et al., JHEP, 06: 154 (2017), arXiv:1703.09681[hep-th
    [63] S. S. Gubser, (1999), arXiv: hep-th/9902155[hep-th]
    [64] I. H. Brevik, K. Ghoroku, and A. Nakamura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15: 57 (2006), arXiv:hepth/0505057[hep-th doi: 10.1142/S0218271806007651
    [65] A. Karch and E. Katz, JHEP, 06: 043 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205236[hep-th
    [66] M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers et al., JHEP, 07: 049 (2003), arXiv:hepth/0304032[hep-th
    [67] J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch et al., Eur. Phys. J. A, 35: 81 (2008), arXiv:0711.4467[hep-th
    [68] J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N. J. Evans et al., Phys. Rev. D, 69: 066007 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0306018[hep-th
    [69] K. Ghoroku and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B, 604: 235 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0408040[hep-th
    [70] S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys., 87: 577 (1983) doi: 10.1007/BF01208266
    [71] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2: 505 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803131[hepth doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a3
    [72] C. P. Herzog, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98: 091601 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0608151[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091601
    [73] S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 131601 (2008), arXiv:0804.1950[hep-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.131601
    [74] S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, Phys. Rev. D, 78: 086007 (2008), arXiv:0804.0434[hep-th
    [75] S. S. Gubser, S. S. Pufu, and F. D. Rocha, JHEP, 08: 085 (2008), arXiv:0806.0407[hep-th
    [76] O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102: 212001 (2009), arXiv:0903.4375[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.212001
    [77] J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 81: 045011 (2010), arXiv:0910.1261[hep-th
    [78] S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 106008 (2014), arXiv:1311.6675[hep-th
    [79] S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D, 90: 115028 (2014), arXiv:1411.4330[hep-th
    [80] R. Yaresko and B. Kampfer, Phys. Lett. B, 747: 36 (2015), arXiv:1306.0214[hep-ph
    [81] R. Yaresko, J. Knaute, and B. Kämpfer, Eur. Phys. J. C, 75: 295 (2015), arXiv:1503.09065 [hep-ph
    [82] P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D, 83: 035015 (2011), arXiv:1008.3116 [hep-ph
    [83] D. Li, S. He, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 09: 041 (2011), arXiv:1103.5389[hep-th
    [84] S. He, S.-Y. Wu, Y. Yang et al., JHEP, 04: 093 (2013), arXiv:1301.0385[hep-th
    [85] Y. Yang and P.-H. Yuan, JHEP, 11: 149 (2014), arXiv:1406.1865[hep-th
    [86] Z. Fang, S. He, and D. Li, Nucl. Phys. B, 907: 187 (2016), arXiv:1512.04062[hep-ph
    [87] R. Rougemont, R. Critelli, J. Noronha-Hostler et al., Phys. Rev. D, 96: 014032 (2017), arXiv:1704.05558[hep-ph
    [88] Z. Li, Y. Chen, D. Li et al., Chin. Phys. C, 42: 013103 (2018), arXiv:1706.02238[hep-ph
    [89] R. Zöllner and B. Kämpfer, (2018), arXiv: 1807.04260[hep-th]
    [90] X. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, Chin. Phys. C, 43: 023105 (2019), arXiv:1810.02136[hep-ph
    [91] K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang et al., JHEP, 04: 036 (2016), arXiv:1512.06493 [hep-ph
    [92] K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang et al., Phys. Rev. D, 93: 101901 (2016), arXiv:1511.02721[hep-ph
    [93] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B, 762: 86 (2016), arXiv:1604.02571[hep-ph
    [94] D. Li and M. Huang, JHEP, 02: 042 (2017), arXiv:1610.09814[hep-ph
    [95] S. P. Bartz and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. C, 97: 044908 (2018), arXiv:1801.00358[hep-ph
    [96] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 98: 114003 (2018), arXiv:1805.05019[hep-ph
    [97] S. P. Bartz and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D, 94: 075022 (2016), arXiv:1607.05751[hep-ph
    [98] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 99: 034028 (2019), arXiv:1810.12525[hep-ph
    [99] Z. Fang, Y.-L. Wu, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D, 100: 054008 (2019), arXiv:1904.04695[hepph
    [100] F. Burger, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. P. Lombardo et al., Phys. Rev. D, 91: 074504 (2015), arXiv:1412.6748[hep-lat
  • 加载中

Cited by

1. Bartz, S.P., Meadows, R.C., Brock, G. Chiral phase transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD with scalar-dilaton coupling[J]. Physical Review D, 2024, 110(2): 026027. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.026027
2. Liu, X.-Y., Peng, X.-C., Wu, Y.-L. et al. Holographic study on QCD phase transition and phase diagram with two flavors[J]. Physical Review D, 2024, 109(5): 054032. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.054032
3. Li, Y.-Y., Liu, X.-L., Liu, X.-Y. et al. Correlations between the deconfining and chiral transitions in holographic QCD[J]. Physical Review D, 2022, 105(3): 034019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034019
4. Fang, Z., Li, Y.-Y., Wu, Y.-L. QCD phase diagram with a background magnetic field in an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model[J]. European Physical Journal C, 2021, 81(6): 545. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09311-5

Figures(8)

Get Citation
Zhen Fang and Yue-Liang Wu. Equation of state and chiral transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD with more realistic gravitational background[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abab90
Zhen Fang and Yue-Liang Wu. Equation of state and chiral transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD with more realistic gravitational background[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abab90 shu
Milestone
Received: 2020-04-09
Revised: 2020-06-14
Article Metric

Article Views(1694)
PDF Downloads(29)
Cited by(4)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Equation of state and chiral transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD with a more realistic gravitational background

    Corresponding author: Zhen Fang, zhenfang@hnu.edu.cn
    Corresponding author: Yue-Liang Wu, ylwu@itp.ac.cn
  • 1. Department of Applied Physics, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • 2. CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 3. International Centre for Theoretical Physics Asia-Pacific (ICTP-AP), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract: We construct an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a cubic coupling term of the dilaton and the bulk scalar field. The background fields in this model are solved by the Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton potential, which has been shown to reproduce the equation of state from the lattice QCD with two flavors. The chiral transition behaviors are investigated in the improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with the solved gravitational background, and the crossover transition can be realized. Our study provides the possibility to address the deconfining and chiral phase transitions simultaneously in the bottom-up holographic framework.

    HTML

    1.   Introduction
    • Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describes the strong interaction between quarks and gluons. Because of asymptotic freedom, the method of perturbative quantum field theory can be applied to study high-energy properties of QCD matter in the ultra-violet (UV) region. However, the strong coupling nature of QCD at low energies makes it impossible to apply the perturbative method for handling nonperturbative problems of QCD. Quark confinement and chiral symmetry breaking are two essential features of low-energy QCD, and the related physics fields have attracted significant interest for many years. The QCD phase transition is such a field that enabled investigation of the low-energy physics of QCD [1]. With increasing temperature, we know that the QCD matters undergo a crossover transition from the hadronic state to the state of quark-gluon plasma (QGP), along with the deconfining process of the partonic degrees of freedom and the restoration of chiral symmetry [2-4].

      Numerous nonperturbative methods have been developed to study the QCD phase transition and issues in low-energy hadron physics [5-8]. As a powerful method, lattice QCD is widely used to tackle the low-energy QCD problems from the first principle. However, there are limitations to this method, such as in the case of nonzero chemical potential, arising due to the sign problem. In recent decades, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence has provided a powerful tool for us to study the low-energy physics of QCD by the holographic duality between a weakly coupled gravity theory in asymptotic AdS5 spacetime and a strongly coupled gauge field theory on the boundary [9-11]. Numerous studies have been conducted in this field, following either the top-down approach or the bottom-up approach [12-62].

      Holographic studies in the top-down approach have shown that the simplest nonsupersymmetric deformation of AdS/CFT with nontrivial dilaton profiles is capable of reproducing the confining properties of QCD [63, 64], and realizing the pattern of chiral symmetry breaking with quarks mimicked by the D7-brane probes [65-69]. However, it is not clear how to generate the crossover transition indicated from lattice QCD in the top-down framework. Indeed, AdS/CFT per se is inadequate to provide a complete description for the thermodynamics of QCD because of its semi-classical character inherited from the type IIB string theory in the low-energy approximation and the large N limit. The string-loop corrections have to be considered to provide an adequate account for thermal QCD. Nevertheless, the qualitative description by such a holographic approach is still meaningful and indeed has provided significant insights in our study of low-energy QCD.

      It was shown that the deconfinement in the pure gauge theory corresponds to a Hawking-Page phase transition between a thermal AdS space and a black hole configuration [70-72]. However, numerous studies employing the bottom-up approach indicate that we can use a bulk gravity system with a nontrivial dilaton profile to characterize the equation of state and the deconfining behaviors of QCD [73-90]. Moreover, unlike the holographic studies of pure gauge theory, the crossover transition in these bottom-up models is only related to the black hole solution solved from the Einstein-dilaton(-Maxwell) system, which is contrary to the usual claim that the black hole is dual to the deconfined phase at high temperatures. As we cannot expect to make use of two distinct bulk geometries to generate a smooth crossover transition in AdS/QCD [27], it seems more natural to provide a description of thermal QCD properties only in terms of the black hole solution. However, in this case we must make sure that the black hole is stable when compared with the thermal gas phase.

      In the bottom-up approach, the soft-wall AdS/QCD model provides a concise framework to address the issues on chiral transition [18]. However, it has been shown that the original soft-wall model lacks spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking [18, 28]. The chiral transitions in the two-flavor case have been studied in a modified soft-wall AdS/QCD model, where the second-order chiral phase transition in the chiral limit and the crossover transition with finite quark masses are first realized in the holographic framework [91, 92]. In Ref. [93], we proposed an improved soft-wall model, which can generate both the correct chiral transition behaviors and the light meson spectra in a consistent manner. The generalizations to the 2+1 flavor case have been considered in Refs. [94-96], and the quark-mass phase diagram that is consistent with the standard scenario can be reproduced. The case of finite chemical potential has also been investigated [97-99], and the chiral phase diagram containing a critical end point can be obtained from the improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with 2+1 flavors [98, 99].

      It should be noted that the AdS-Schwarzschild black-hole background has been used in most of studies of chiral transition at zero chemical potentials. However, such an AdS black-hole solution is dual to a conformal gauge theory, which cannot generate the QCD equation of state without breaking the conformal invariance [73]. As mentioned above, one can resort to the Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton profile to rescue this issue. Hence, we wonder whether the correct chiral transition behaviors can still be obtained from a soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a solved gravitational background from the Einstein-dilaton system. In this work, we shall consider this issue and try to combine the description of chiral transition with that of the equation of state, which signifies deconfinement in a unified holographic framework.

      This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we consider an Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton potential, which can produce the equation of state that is consistent with lattice results in the two-flavor case. The vacuum expectation value (VEV) of the Polyakov loop is computed in such a background system and compared with the lattice data. In Sec. 3, we propose an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a cubic coupling term of the dilaton and the bulk scalar field. The chiral transition behaviors are considered in the two-flavor case. The crossover behaviors of chiral transition can be realized in this model. The parameter dependence of chiral transition is also investigated. In Sec. 4, we present a brief summary of our work and conclude with some remarks.

    2.   QCD equation of state from holography

      2.1.   Einstein-dilaton system

    • In previous studies, we proposed an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a running bulk scalar mass m25(z), which yields an appropriate characterization for the chiral transition in both the two-flavor and the 2+1 flavor case [93, 96]. However, the AdS-Schwarzschild black hole employed in this model cannot describe the thermodynamical behaviors of the QCD equation of state and other equilibrium quantities, which indicate obvious violation of conformal invariance [73]. To acquire these basic features of thermal QCD, we must construct a proper gravity background other than the AdS-type black hole to break the conformal invariance of the dual gauge theory. The minimal action of such a background system is given in the string frame as

      Sg=12κ25d5xge2ϕ[R+4(ϕ)2V(ϕ)],

      (1)

      where κ25=8πG5, and a dilaton field ϕ has been introduced to account for relevant deformations of the dual conformal field theory. The dilaton ϕ(z) is assumed to depend only on the radial coordinate z. The key point of this model is to find a particular form of the dilaton potential V(ϕ) with necessary ingredients to describe the QCD thermodynamics, such as the equation of state.

      The metric of the bulk geometry in the string frame can be written as

      ds2=L2e2AS(z)z2(f(z)dt2+dxidxi+dz2f(z)),

      (2)

      with the asymptotic structure of AdS5 spacetime at z0 to guarantee the UV conformal behavior of the dual gauge theory on the boundary. We take the AdS radius L=1 for convenience. To simplify the calculation, we work in the Einstein frame with the metric ansatz

      ds2=L2e2AE(z)z2(f(z)dt2+dxidxi+dz2f(z)).

      (3)

      The warp factors in the two frames are related by AS=AE+23ϕ, in terms of which the background action in the Einstein frame can be obtained from the string-frame action (1) as

      Sg=12κ25d5xgE[RE43(ϕ)2VE(ϕ)],

      (4)

      with VE(ϕ)e4ϕ3V(ϕ) (the subscript E denotes the Einstein frame).

    • 2.2.   EOM with a nontrivial dilaton potential

    • The independent Einstein equations can be derived by the variation of the action (4) with respect to the metric gMN,

      f

      (5)

      A_E'' +\frac{2}{z}A_E' -A_E'^2 +\frac{4}{9}\phi'^2 = 0 .

      (6)

      The equation of motion (EOM) of the dilaton \phi in the Einstein frame can also be derived as

      \phi'' +\left(3 A_E' +\frac{f'}{f}-\frac{3}{z}\right)\phi' -\frac{3{\rm e}^{2A_E}\partial_{\phi}V_E(\phi)}{8z^2f} = 0 .

      (7)

      Given the dilaton potential V_E(\phi) , the numerical solution of the background fields A_E , f , and \phi can be solved from the coupled differential equations (5), (6), and (7).

      Although there are few constraints on the form of the dilaton potential from the top-down approach of AdS/QCD, it has been shown that a proper V_E(\phi) can be constructed from the bottom up to describe the equation of state of the strongly coupled QGP [73, 74]. Near the boundary, the bulk geometry must approach the AdS _5 spacetime, which corresponds to a UV fixed point of the dual gauge theory. This requires that the dilaton potential at UV has the following asymptotic form:

      V_c(\phi_c\to0) \simeq -\frac{12}{L^2}+\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi_c^2+{\cal{O}}(\phi_c^4),

      (8)

      with the rescaled dilaton field defined by \phi_c = \sqrt{\frac{8}{3}}\phi , in terms of which the action (4) can be recast into the canonical form

      S_g = \frac{1}{2\kappa_5^2}\int {\rm d}^5x\sqrt{-g_E}\left[R_E -\frac{1}{2}(\partial\phi_c)^2 -V_c(\phi_c)\right],

      (9)

      with V_c(\phi_c) = V_E(\phi) . As argued in Ref. [74], the dilaton potential at IR takes an exponential form V_c(\phi_c) \sim V_0{\rm e}^{\gamma\phi_c} with V_0<0 and \gamma>0 to yield the Chamblin-Reall solution, whose adiabatic generalization links the QCD equation of state to the specific form of V_c(\phi_c) .

      According to AdS/CFT, the mass squared of \phi_c is related to the scaling dimension \Delta of the dual operator on the boundary by m^2 L^2 = \Delta(\Delta-4) [16]. We only consider the case of 2<\Delta<4 , which corresponds to the relevant deformations satisfying the Breitenlohner-Freedman (BF) bound [73, 77]. It is usually assumed that the dilaton field \phi_c is dual to the gauge-invariant dimension-4 glueball operator \mathop{{\rm{tr}}}\nolimits F^2_{\mu\nu} , although other possibilities, such as a dimension-2 gluon mass operator, have also been considered [32]. Following Ref. [73], we attempt to match QCD at some intermediate semi-hard scale, where the scaling dimension of \mathop{{\rm{tr}}}\nolimits F^2_{\mu\nu} would have a value smaller than 4 . One remark is that the asymptotic freedom cannot be captured in this way, but will be replaced by conformal invariance when above the semi-hard scale [73]. The full consideration might go beyond the supergravity approximation. In this study, we take \Delta = 3 , which has been shown to describe the equation of state from lattice QCD with 2+1 flavors [78, 79] and is also easier to implement in the numerical calculation. We note that other values of \Delta can also be used to mimick the QCD equation of state, and this is by and large determined by the particular form of the dilaton potential and the specific parameter values [73, 77]. The main aim of our study is to investigate the chiral properties based on a gravitational background, which can reproduce the QCD equation of state. Thus, we did not delve into the possible influence of the value of \Delta on the results considered in our work. Following the studies in Ref. [73], we choose a relatively simple dilaton potential, which satisfies the required UV and IR asymptotics,

      V_c(\phi_c) = \frac{1}{L^2}\left(-12\cosh\gamma\phi_c +b_2\phi_c^2 +b_4\phi_c^4\right) ,

      (10)

      where \gamma and b_2 are constrained by the UV asymptotic form (8) as

      b_2 = 6\gamma^2 +\frac{\Delta(\Delta-4)}{2} = 6\gamma^2 -\frac{3}{2} .

      (11)

      The dilaton potential V_E(\phi) has the form

      \begin{array}{l} V_E(\phi) = V_c(\phi_c) = V_c(\sqrt{8/3}\,\phi) . \end{array}

      (12)

      We see that the Einstein-dilaton system given above can also be used to mimick the two-flavor lattice results of the QCD equation of state, whereby the dilaton potential V_E(\phi) and the background geometry can be reconstructed for the two-flavor case.

    • 2.3.   Equation of state

    • Now, we consider the equation of state in the Einstein-dilaton system with the given form of the dilaton potential (10). First, the background geometry has an event horizon at z = z_h , which is determined by f(z_h) = 0 . In terms of the metric ansatz (3), the Hawking temperature T of the black hole is given by

      T = \frac{|f'(z_h)|}{4\pi},

      (13)

      and the entropy density s is related to the area of the horizon,

      s = \frac{{\rm e}^{3A_E(z_h)}}{4 G_5 z_h^3}.

      (14)

      Thus, we can compute the speed of sound c_s by the formula

      c_s^2 = \frac{{\rm d}\,\mathrm{log}T}{{\rm d}\,\mathrm{log}s}.

      (15)

      Moreover, the pressure p can be obtained from the thermodynamic relation s = \dfrac{\partial p}{\partial T} as

      p = -\int_{\infty}^{z_h} s(\bar{z}_h)T'(\bar{z}_h) {\rm d}\bar{z}_h.

      (16)

      The energy density \varepsilon = -p+sT and the trace anomaly \varepsilon-3p can also be computed. Then, we can study the temperature dependence of the equation of state in such an Einstein-dilaton system. As we constrain ourselves to the two-flavor case, the equation of state from lattice QCD with two flavors is used to construct the dilaton potential V_E(\phi) [100].

      Instead of implementing the numerical procedure elucidated in Ref. [74], we directly solve the background fields from Eqs. (5), (6), and (7). To simplify the computation, Eq. (5) can be integrated into a first-order differential equation

      \begin{array}{l} f' +f_c\,{\rm e}^{-3A_E}z^3 = 0 , \end{array}

      (17)

      where f_c is the integral constant. In view of \Delta = 3 , the UV asymptotic forms of the background fields at z\to0 can be obtained as

      \begin{split} A_E(z) =& -\frac{2p_1^2}{27} z^2 +\cdots , \\ f(z) =& 1 -\frac{f_c}{4} z^4 +\cdots , \\ \phi(z) =& p_1 z+p_3 z^3 +\frac{4p_1^3}{9}\left(12b_4 -6\gamma^4 +1\right)z^3\log z +\cdots, \end{split}

      (18)

      with three independent parameters p_1, p_3 , and f_c . As we have f(z_h) = 0 , to guarantee the regular behavior of \phi(z) near the horizon, Eq. (7) must satisfy a natural IR boundary condition at z = z_h ,

      \begin{array}{l} \left[f'\phi' -\dfrac{3{\rm e}^{2A_E}}{8z^2}\partial_{\phi}V_E(\phi)\right]_{z = z_h} = 0 . \end{array}

      (19)

      With the UV asymptotic form (18) and the IR boundary condition (19), the background fields f , A_E , and \phi can be solved numerically from Eqs. (6), (7), and (17). We find that the dilaton potential (10) with \gamma = 0.55 , b_2 = 0.315 , and b_4 = -0.125 can efficiently reproduce the two-flavor lattice QCD results of the equation of state. Note that \gamma and b_2 are related by the formula (11). Parameter p_1 = 0.675 \;\rm{GeV} is also fitted by the lattice results, and the 5D Newton constant is taken as G_5 = 1 in our consideration. Parameters p_3 and f_c in (18) are constrained by the IR boundary condition (19), and thus, depend on horizon z_h or temperature T . We show the z_h -dependence of parameter f_c and temperature T in Fig. 1. Both f_c and T decrease monotonically towards zero with the increase of z_h , which implies that our black hole solution persists in the entire range of T . We also show parameter p_3 as a function of T in Fig. 2, where we see that p_3 varies very slowly in the range of T = 0\sim 0.2 \;\rm{GeV} , then decreases and approaches negative values at around T\simeq 0.28 \;\rm{GeV} .

      Figure 1.  zh-dependence of parameter fc and temperature T.

      Figure 2.  Temperature dependence of parameter p_3 .

      The temperature dependences of entropy density s/T^3 and speed of sound squared c_s^2 are shown in Fig. 3, while in Fig. 4 we compare the numerical results of pressure 3p/T^4 and energy density \varepsilon/T^4 in units of T^4 with the lattice interpolation results for the B-mass ensemble considered in Ref. [100]. In Fig. 5, we present the model result of trace anomaly (\varepsilon-3p)/T^4 , which is also compared with the lattice interpolation result. We see that the Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton potential can generate crossover behavior of the equation of state, which matches well with the lattice results.

      Figure 3.  Model results of entropy density s/T^3 (left panel) and speed of sound squared c_s^2 (right panel) as functions of T obtained from the Einstein-dilaton system.

      Figure 4.  (color online) Model results of pressure 3p/T^4 (left panel) and energy density \varepsilon/T^4 (right panel) as functions of T compared with the lattice interpolation results of the two-flavor QCD, depicted by the red band [100].

      Figure 5.  (color online) Model result of trace anomaly (\varepsilon-3p)/T^4 as a function of T compared with the lattice interpolation results of the two-flavor QCD depicted by the red band [100].

    • 2.4.   Polyakov loop

    • The deconfining phase transition in thermal QCD is characterized by the VEV of the Polyakov loop, which is defined as

      L(T) = \frac{1}{N_c} \mathop{{\rm{tr}}}\nolimits P\exp\left[{\rm i}g\int_0^{1/T}{\rm d}\tau\hat{A}_0\right] ,

      (20)

      where \hat{A}_0 is the time component of the non-Abelian gauge field operator, and symbol P denotes path ordering, and the trace is over the fundamental representation of SU(N_c) .

      The VEV of the Polyakov loop in AdS/CFT is schematically given by the world-sheet path integral

      \begin{array}{l} \left\langle {L}\right\rangle = \int DX {\rm e}^{-S_w}, \end{array}

      (21)

      where X is a set of world-sheet fields, and S_w is the classical world-sheet action [76, 77]. In principle, \left\langle {L}\right\rangle can be evaluated approximately in terms of the minimal surface of the string world-sheet with given boundary conditions. In the low-energy and large N_c limit, we have \left\langle {L}\right\rangle\sim {\rm e}^{-S_{NG}} with the Nambu-Goto action

      S_{NG} = \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\int {\rm d}^2\sigma \sqrt{\det (g_{\mu\nu}^S\partial_a X^{\mu}\partial_b X^{\nu})} ,

      (22)

      where \alpha' denotes the string tension, g^S_{\mu\nu} is the string-frame metric, and X^{\mu} = X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma) is the embedding of the world-sheet in the bulk spacetime. The regularized minimal world-sheet area takes the form

      S_{R} = \frac{g_p}{\pi T} \int_\epsilon^{z_h}{\rm d}z\frac{{\rm e}^{2A_S}}{z^2},

      (23)

      with g_p = \dfrac{L^2}{2\alpha'} [76]. Subtracting the UV divergent terms and letting \epsilon\to 0 , the renormalized world-sheet area can be obtained as

      \begin{split} S_0 =& S_0' +c_p = \frac{g_p}{\pi T}\int_0^{z_h} {\rm d}z \left[\frac{{\rm e}^{2A_S}}{z^2} - \left(\frac{1}{z^2}+\frac{4p_1}{3z}\right)\right] \\ & +\frac{g_p}{\pi T}\left(\frac{4p_1}{3}\log z_h-\frac{1}{z_h}\right) +c_p , \end{split}

      (24)

      where c_p is a scheme-dependent normalization constant. Thus the VEV of the Polyakov loop can be written as

      \begin{array}{l} \left\langle {L}\right\rangle = w {\rm e}^{-S_0} = {\rm e}^{-S_0' +c_p'}, \end{array}

      (25)

      where w is a weight coefficient and the normalization constant c_p' = \ln w-c_p .

      We plot the temperature-dependent behavior of \left\langle {L}\right\rangle with the parameter values g_p = 0.29 and c_p' = 0.16 in Fig. 6, where we also show the two-flavor lattice data of the renormalized Polyakov loop (corresponding to the B-mass ensemble in [100]). We can see that the model result fits the lattice data quite well when we choose proper values of g_p and c_p' .

      Figure 6.  (color online) Model result of the VEV of Polyakov loop \left\langle {L}\right\rangle as a function of T compared with lattice data of renormalized Polyakov loop for the B-mass ensemble denoted by the colored points with error bars [100].

    • 2.5.   On the stability of the black hole solution

    • One remark must be made on the background solution of the Einstein-dilaton system. In the above description of the equation of state, we have only used the black hole solution, which is asymptotic to AdS _5 near the boundary; further, we have seen that this is crucial for the realization of the crossover transition. However, in principle, the Einstein-dilaton system also admits a thermal gas solution, which can be obtained by setting f(z) = 1 [49, 72]. To guarantee the soundness of our calculation, we must verify the stability of the black hole solution against the thermal gas one.

      According to AdS/CFT, the free energy is related to the on-shell action of the background fields by \beta{\cal{F}} = {\cal{S}}^R with \beta = 1/T , and the regularized on-shell action consists of three parts:

      \begin{array}{l} {\cal{S}}^R = {\cal{S}}_{E}+{\cal{S}}_{\rm GH}+{\cal{S}}_{\rm count} = {\cal{S}}_{\epsilon}+{\cal{S}}_{\rm IR}+{\cal{S}}_{\rm count}, \end{array}

      (26)

      where {\cal{S}}_{E} denotes the on-shell Einstein-Hilbert action, {\cal{S}}_{\rm GH} denotes the Gibbons-Hawking term, and {\cal{S}}_{\rm count} denotes the counter term. Subscripts \epsilon and IR denote the contributions at UV cut-off z = \epsilon and IR cut-off z = z_{\rm IR}, respectively. Following Ref. [49], we can obtain the regularized on-shell action of the black hole (BH) solution:

      \begin{split} {\cal{S}}_{\rm BH} =& {\cal{S}}_{\rm BH}^{\epsilon} +{\cal{S}}_{\rm BH}^{\rm count} = 2\beta M^3V_3\Bigg(3b^2(\epsilon)f(\epsilon)b'(\epsilon)\\&+\frac{1}{2}b^3(\epsilon)f'(\epsilon)\Bigg) +{\cal{S}}_{\rm BH}^{\rm count}, \end{split}

      (27)

      where M^3\equiv1/(16\pi G_5) , V_3 is the three-space volume, and b(z)\equiv\frac{L}{z}{\rm e}^{A_E(z)} . Note that {\cal{S}}_{\rm BH} has no IR contribution due to f(z_h) = 0 . The regularized on-shell action of the thermal gas (TG) solution takes the form:

      \begin{split} {\cal{S}}_{\rm TG} =& {\cal{S}}_{\rm TG}^{\epsilon} +{\cal{S}}_{\rm TG}^{\rm IR} +{\cal{S}}_{\rm TG}^{\rm count} = 2\tilde{\beta}M^3\tilde{V}_3\left(3b_0^2(\epsilon)b_0'(\epsilon) \right.\\&\left.+b_0^2(z_{\rm IR})b_0'(z_{\rm IR})\right) +{\cal{S}}_{\rm TG}^{\rm count}, \end{split}

      (28)

      where b_0(z)\equiv\frac{L}{z}{\rm e}^{A_{E0}(z)} and \tilde{\beta}, \tilde{V}_3 denote the corresponding quantities in the thermal gas case. To compare the free energies, we must make sure that the intrinsic geometries near the boundary are the same for the two background solutions, i.e., the proper length of time circle and proper volume of three-space should be the same at z = \epsilon , which imposes the following conditions [49]:

      \begin{array}{l} \tilde{\beta}b_0(\epsilon) = \beta b(\epsilon)\sqrt{f(\epsilon)}, \quad \tilde{V_3}b_0^3(\epsilon) = V_3 b^3(\epsilon) . \end{array}

      (29)

      With the condition (29), the free energy difference between the two background solutions has the form:

      \begin{split} {\cal{F}} =& \beta^{-1}\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}({\cal{S}}_{\rm BH} -{\cal{S}}_{\rm TG}) = 2M^3V_3\Bigg(3b^2(\epsilon)f(\epsilon)b'(\epsilon)\\&+\frac{1}{2}b^3(\epsilon)f'(\epsilon) -3\frac{b^4(\epsilon)}{b_0^2(\epsilon)}\sqrt{f(\epsilon)}b_0'(\epsilon)\Bigg), \end{split}

      (30)

      where the IR contribution in (28) has been omitted, as this term vanishes for good singularities [49]. In terms of the UV asymptotic forms (18), we obtain the following result:

      {\cal{F}} = -\frac{1}{4}f_cL^3M^3V_3,

      (31)

      where we have taken the limit \epsilon\to 0 . Note that the UV divergent terms in {\cal{S}}_{\rm BH} and {\cal{S}}_{\rm TG} have the same form, thus cancelling in the final result. As f_c>0 , we have {\cal{F}}<0 , which implies that the black hole phase is more stable than the thermal gas phase.

    3.   Chiral transition in improved soft-wall model with solved background
    • Our previous studies have shown that the chiral transition at zero baryon chemical potential can be characterized by an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model in the AdS-Schwarzschild black hole background [93, 96]. However, this black hole solution cannot describe the QCD equation of state due to the conformal invariance of the dual gauge theory. The main aim of this work is to combine the advantages of the improved soft-wall model in the description of chiral transition with a background system that can reproduce the deconfinement properties of QCD. As a first attempt, we investigate the possible approaches to produce the chiral transition behaviors in the two-flavor case based on an improved soft-wall model (as the flavor part) under the more realistic background solved from the above Einstein-dilaton system.

    • 3.1.   Flavor action

    • We first outline the improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with two flavors, which is proposed in Ref. [93]. The bulk action relevant to the chiral transition in this model is the scalar sector,

      \begin{array}{l} S_X^{isw} = -\int {\rm d}^5x\sqrt{-g}{\rm e}^{-\Phi}\mathrm{Tr}\left\{|\partial X|^2 +V_X(X)\right\} , \end{array}

      (32)

      where the dilaton takes the form \Phi(z) = \mu_g^2\,z^2 to produce the linear Regge spectra of light mesons, and the scalar potential is

      \begin{array}{l} V_X(X) = m_5^2(z)|X|^{2} +\lambda |X|^{4}, \end{array}

      (33)

      with a running bulk mass m_5^2(z) = -3 -\mu_c^2\,z^2 . The constant term of m_5^2(z) is determined by the mass-dimension relation m_5^2L^2 = \Delta(\Delta-4) for a bulk scalar field [15, 16], while the z -squared term is motivated by the phenomenology of the meson spectrum and the quark mass anomalous dimension [93].

      In the holographic framework, a natural mechanism to produce such a z -dependent term of m_5^2(z) is to introduce a coupling between the dilaton and the bulk scalar field. As we can see, without changing the results of the improved soft-wall model, the scalar potential can be recast into another form

      \begin{array}{l} V_X(X,\Phi) = m_5^2|X|^{2} -\lambda_1\Phi |X|^{2} +\lambda_2|X|^{4}, \end{array}

      (34)

      where m_5^2 = -3 , and a cubic coupling term of \Phi and X has been introduced. The effects of similar couplings on the low-energy hadron properties have also been considered in previous studies [32]. Here, we propose such a change of V_X from (33) to (34) with the aim to describe the chiral transition behaviors for the two-flavor case. Thus, the flavor action that will be addressed in this work is

      \begin{array}{l} S_X = -\int {\rm d}^5x\sqrt{-g}{\rm e}^{-\Phi}\mathrm{Tr}\left\{|\partial X|^2 +V_X(X,\Phi)\right\} . \end{array}

      (35)

      Unlike in previous studies, the metric and the dilaton in the flavor action (35) will be solved from the Einstein-dilaton system (6), (7), and (17), which has been shown to reproduce the two-flavor lattice results of the equation of state. We assume that the flavor action (35) has been written in the string frame with the metric ansatz (2). In our model, the dilaton field \phi in the background action (1) has been distinguished from the field \Phi in the flavor action (35). From AdS/CFT, these two fields may be reasonably identified as the same one, as indicated by the Dirac-Born-Infeld action, which dictates the dynamics of the open string sector with the string coupling g_s = {\rm e}^{\phi} . This is implemented in some studies [32]. However, the low-energy and large- N limits taken in AdS/CFT and the further reduction to AdS/QCD have made things more subtle. The exact correspondence between g_s and {\rm e}^{\phi} is not consolidated in the bottom-up AdS/QCD. In contrast, the dilaton term {\rm e}^{-\Phi} in the flavor sector has been introduced to realize the Regge spectra of hadrons [18]. In this work, we concentrate on the phenomenological aspects and study how to realize more low-energy properties of QCD by the holographic approach. Thus, we attempt a more general form \Phi = k\phi with k a parameter, which will not affect the linear Regge spectra qualitatively. In the actual calculation, we choose two simplest cases k = 1 and k = 2 to investigate the effects of k on chiral behaviors. The probe approximation that neglects the backreaction effect of the flavor sector on the background system is adopted in this work, as in most studies on AdS/QCD with a fixed background.

    • 3.2.   EOM of the scalar VEV

    • According to AdS/CFT, the VEV of the bulk scalar field in the two-flavor case can be written as \langle X\rangle = \dfrac{\chi(z)}{2}I_2 with I_2 denoting the 2\times2 identity matrix, and the chiral condensate is incorporated in the UV expansion of the scalar VEV \chi(z) [16]. To address the issue on chiral transition, we only need to consider the action of the scalar VEV,

      S_{\chi} = -\int {\rm d}^5x\sqrt{-g}{\rm e}^{-\Phi}\left(\frac{1}{2}g^{zz}(\partial_z\chi)^2 +V(\chi,\Phi)\right),

      (36)

      with

      V(\chi,\Phi) = \mathrm{Tr}\,V_X(\left\langle {X}\right\rangle,\Phi) = \frac{1}{2}(m_5^2-\lambda_1\Phi)\chi^{2} +\frac{\lambda_2}{8} \chi^{4} .

      (37)

      In terms of the metric ansatz (2), the EOM of \chi(z) can be derived from the action (36) as

      \chi''+\left(3A_S'-\Phi' +\frac{f'}{f}-\frac{3}{z}\right)\chi' -\frac{{\rm e}^{2A_S}\,\partial_\chi V(\chi,\Phi)}{z^2 f} = 0 .

      (38)

      The UV asymptotic form of \chi(z) at z\to0 can be obtained from Eq. (38) as

      \begin{split} \chi(z) = & m_q\zeta z +(6-k+k\lambda_1)m_q p_1\zeta z^2 +\frac{\sigma}{\zeta}z^3 \\ & +\frac{1}{3}\left[m_q\zeta p_1^2\left(30 k -3k^2 -23k\lambda_1 -\frac{3}{2}k^2\lambda_1^2 \right.\right. \\ & \left.\left. +\frac{9}{2}k^2\lambda_1 -\frac{224}{3} \right) +\frac{3}{4}m_q^3\zeta^3\lambda_2\right] z^3\log z +\cdots , \end{split}

      (39)

      where m_q is the current quark mass, \sigma is the chiral condensate, and \zeta = \frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{2\pi} is a normalization constant [20]. As in Eq. (7), a natural boundary condition at horizon z_h follows from the regular condition of \chi(z) near z_h ,

      \left[f'\chi' -\frac{{\rm e}^{2A_S}}{z^2}\partial_\chi V(\chi,\Phi)\right]_{z = z_h} = 0 .

      (40)
    • 3.3.   Chiral transition

    • To study the chiral transition properties in the improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with the given background, we must solve the scalar VEV \chi(z) numerically from Eq. (38) with the UV asymptotic form (39) and the IR boundary condition (40). The chiral condensate can then be extracted from the UV expansion of \chi(z) . In the calculation, we take the set of parameter values that has been used to fit the lattice results of the equation of state in the two-flavor case (see Sec. 2.3), and the quark mass is fixed as m_q = 5 \;\rm{MeV} .

      In this work, we only consider two cases corresponding to k = 1 ( \Phi = \phi ) and k = 2 ( \Phi = 2\phi ). In each case, the temperature dependence of the chiral condensate normalized by \sigma_0 = \sigma(T = 0) is investigated for a set of values of \lambda_1 and \lambda_2 . We first fix \lambda_2 = 1 , and select four different values of \lambda_1 for each case. The model results of the normalized chiral condensate \sigma/\sigma_0 as a function of T are shown in Fig. 7. We can see that the crossover transition can be realized qualitatively in such an improved soft-wall model with the solved gravitational background. Moreover, we find that there is a decreasing tendency for the transition temperature with the decrease of \lambda_1 , yet a visible bump emerges near the transition region at relatively smaller \lambda_1 and only disappears gradually with the increase of \lambda_1 . As shown in Fig. 7, we find that the transition temperatures with our selected parameter values are larger than the lattice result T_{\chi}\sim193 \;\rm{MeV} [100].

      Figure 7.  Normalized chiral condensate \sigma/\sigma_0 as a function of T for different values of \lambda_1 in cases k = 1 and k = 2 with \lambda_2 = 1 .

      We then investigate the effects of the quartic coupling constant \lambda_2 on chiral transitions. We fix \lambda_1 = -1.4 for the case k = 1 and \lambda_1 = -0.5 for the case k = 2 , and select four different values of \lambda_2 in each case. The chiral transition curves are plotted in Fig. 8. The result shows that with the increase of \lambda_2 the bump near the transition region becomes smaller, and the normalized chiral condensate \sigma/\sigma_0 descends gently with T , though the value of \lambda_2 needs to be considerably large to smooth across the bump.

      Figure 8.  Normalized chiral condensate \sigma/\sigma_0 as a function of T for different values of \lambda_2 in cases k = 1 and k = 2 with fixed values of \lambda_1 .

    4.   Conclusion and discussion
    • We considered an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model with a cubic coupling term between the dilaton and the bulk scalar field in a more realistic background, which is solved from the Einstein-dilaton system with a nontrivial dilaton potential. Such an Einstein-dilaton system was used to reproduce the equation of state from lattice QCD with two flavors. Then, the chiral transition behaviors were investigated in the improved soft-wall model based on the solved bulk background. We only considered two typical cases with k = 1 and k = 2 , and the quartic coupling constant is first fixed as \lambda_2 = 1 . In both cases, the crossover behavior of chiral transition can be realized, as seen from Fig. 7. Nevertheless, the chiral transition temperatures obtained from the model are significantly larger than the lattice result. Although T_{\chi} decreases with the decrease in \lambda_1 , a visible bump near the transition region emerges when \lambda_1 is small enough. We then studied the influence of the value of \lambda_2 on the chiral transition, as shown in Fig. 8. We find that in some sense, the quartic coupling term can smooth the bump; however, to remove it, the value of \lambda_2 must be considerably large.

      In our consideration, the scaling dimension of the dual operator \mathop{{\rm{tr}}}\nolimits F^2_{\mu\nu} of the dilaton has been taken as \Delta = 3 , which can be used to mimick the QCD equation of state [78, 79]. However, we remark that the properties of thermal QCD considered in our work are not determined exclusively by one particular value of \Delta . Indeed, other values of \Delta have also been adopted for the realization of the equation of state with slightly different forms of V_E(\phi) [73, 77]. Because the UV matching to QCD at a finite scale cannot capture asymptotic freedom, we are content to provide a phenomenological description on the thermodynamic properties of QCD, which are expected not to be so sensitive to the UV regime from the angle of renormalization and effective field theory. In this study, we have built an improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model under a more realistic gravitational background, which provides a possibility in the holographic framework to address the deconfining and chiral phase transition simultaneously.

      We have assumed that the backreaction of the flavor sector to the background is sufficiently small, such that we can adopt the solution of the Einstein-dilaton system as the bulk background, under which the chiral properties of the improved soft-wall model are considered. This is sensible only when we take a small weight of the flavor action (35) compared to the background action (1). To clarify the phase structure in this improved soft-wall AdS/QCD model, we must thoroughly consider the backreaction of the flavor part to the background system. The correlation between the deconfining and chiral phase transitions can then be studied with such an improved soft-wall model coupled with an Einstein-dilaton system. The case of finite chemical potential can also be considered by introducing a U(1) gauge field to study the properties of the QCD phase diagram.

Reference (100)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return