-
Under the quasi-two-body approximation, the PQCD factorization formula for the decay amplitude
$ {\mathcal A} $ of the decay$ B\to D R \to D KK $ can be expressed as the convolution of a calculable hard kernel H with the universal light-cone distribution amplitudes [82,83]$ \begin{eqnarray} {\cal A} \sim \Phi_B\otimes H\otimes \Phi_{D}\otimes\Phi_{KK}, \end{eqnarray} $
(1) in which
$ \Phi_B $ and$ \Phi_{D} $ are the distribution amplitudes for the B and D mesons, respectively. The distribution amplitude$ \Phi_{KK} $ is introduced to describe the interactions between the kaon pair originating from the resonance R.In the PQCD approach, the distribution amplitudes for the initial and final states are crucial inputs. In this work, we employ the same forms of
$ \Phi_B $ and$ \Phi_{D} $ as those widely adopted in PQCD; one can find their explicit expressions and parameters in Ref. [69] and the references therein. For the P-wave$ KK $ system along with the subprocesses$ \rho^+ \to KK $ , the distribution amplitudes are organized into [28,32]$ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi^{P\rm{-wave}}_{KK}(z,s) =& \frac{-1}{\sqrt{2N_c}} \Big[\sqrt{s}\,{\not\epsilon}_L\phi^0(z,s) + {\not\epsilon}_L {\notp} \phi^t(z,s)\\&+\sqrt s \phi^s(z,s) \Big], \end{aligned} $
(2) where z is the momentum fraction for the spectator quark, s is the squared invariant mass of the kaon pair, and
$ \epsilon_L $ and p are the longitudinal polarization vector and momentum for the resonances, respectively. The twist-2 and twist-3 distribution amplitudes$ \phi^{0} $ ,$ \phi^{s} $ , and$ \phi^{t} $ are chosen as$ \begin{eqnarray} \phi^{0}(z,s) = \frac{3 F_K(s)}{\sqrt{2N_c}} z(1-z)\left[1+a_2^{0} C^{3/2}_2(1-2z) \right], \end{eqnarray} $
(3) $ \begin{eqnarray} \phi^{s}(z,s) = \frac{3 F^s_K(s)}{2\sqrt{2N_c}}(1-2z)\left[1+a_2^s\left(1-10z+10z^2\right) \right], \end{eqnarray} $
(4) $ \begin{eqnarray} \phi^{t}(z,s) = \frac{3 F^t_K(s)}{2\sqrt{2N_c}}(1-2z)^2\left[1+a_2^t C^{3/2}_2(1-2z)\right]. \quad \end{eqnarray} $
(5) with the Gegenbauer polynomial
$ C^{3/2}_2(t) = 3\left(5t^2-1\right)/2 $ and the Gegenbauer moments$ a_2^{0} = 0.25\pm0.10 $ ,$ a_2^s = 0.75\pm0.25 $ , and$ a_2^t = -0.60\pm0.20 $ [32,84]. The vector time-like form factors$ F^s_K(s) $ and$ F^t_K(s) $ for the twist-$ 3 $ distribution amplitudes are deduced by the assumption$ F^{s,t}_K(s)\approx (f^T_{\rho}/f_{\rho})F_K(s) $ [81,84] with$ f_\rho = 0.216 $ GeV and$ f^T_\rho = 0.165 $ GeV [85].For the P-wave
$ K^+K^- $ and$ K^0\bar{K}^0 $ systems, the kaon form factors are generally saturated by$ \rho(770) $ ,$ \omega(782) $ ,$ \phi(1020) $ , and their radial excitations. When it comes to the$ K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ case, only the ρ family states contribute, and the vector timelike form factors can be simply expressed as [63,78,81]$ \begin{eqnarray} F_K(s)= \sum_{\rho_i} c^K_{\rho_i} {\rm{BW}}_{\rho_i}(s), \end{eqnarray} $
(6) where the symbol
$ \rho_i $ indicates the resonance$ \rho(770) $ and its excited states. For the normalization factors for$ \rho(1450) $ and$ \rho(1700) $ , we take$ c^K_{\rho(1450)} = -0.156\pm0.015 $ and$c^K_{\rho(1700)} = -0.083\pm0.019$ as discussed in detail in Ref. [81]. The resonance shape for$ \rho(1450,1700) $ is described by the KS version of the BW formula [63,86]:$ \begin{eqnarray} {\rm{BW}}_R(s) = \frac{m_R^2}{m_R^2-s- {\rm i}\sqrt{s}\Gamma_{\rm tot}(s)}\,. \end{eqnarray} $
(7) where the mass-dependent width
$\Gamma_{\rm tot}(s)$ can be found in Refs. [87,88].By combining various of contributions from the relevant Feynman diagrams as shown in Fig. 1, the total decay amplitudes for the concerned quasi-two-body decays are written as
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{A}({B^+ \to \bar{D}^0} [\rho^+\to] K^+ \bar{K}^0) = &\frac{G_F}{\sqrt2}V^*_{cb}V_{ud} [a_2F_{eD}^{LL}\\&+C_1M_{eD}^{LL}+a_1F_{e\rho}^{LL}+C_2 M_{e\rho}^{LL} ], \end{aligned} $
(8) $ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{A}({B^0 \to {D^-} [\rho^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0}) = &\frac{G_F}{\sqrt2}V^*_{cb}V_{ud} [a_2F_{eD}^{LL}\\&+C_1M_{eD}^{LL} +a_1F_{a\rho}^{LL}+C_2M_{a\rho}^{LL}], \end{aligned} $
(9) $ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{A}({B_s^0 \to {D_s^-} [\rho^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0}) = &\frac{G_F}{\sqrt2}V^*_{cb}V_{ud} [a_2F_{eD}^{LL}\\&+C_1M_{eD}^{LL} ], \end{aligned} $
(10) where
$ G_F = 1.16638 \times $ $ 10^{-5}\; {\rm{GeV}}^{-2} $ is the Fermi coupling constant,$ V_{cb,ud} $ are the CKM matrix elements, and$ a_1 = C_1+ C_2/3 $ and$ a_2 = C_2+ C_1/3 $ are the Wilson coefficients. The PQCD calculations of individual amplitudes$ F^{LL}_{eD,e\rho,a\rho} $ and$ M^{LL}_{eD,e\rho,a\rho} $ for the factorizable and nonfactorizable Feynman diagrams are carried out in the frame with the B meson at rest. Because of the same quark composition, the decay amplitudes for the considered decays with the intermediate resonances$ \rho(1450,1700) $ are the same as those with$ \rho(770) $ , and the explicit expressions, together with the definitions of related momenta in the light-cone coordinates, have been presented in Ref. [78]. For the sake of simplicity, we shall not present them in this work. -
The masses for the initial and final particles, the full widths for the resonance states, and the decay constants for B and D mesons are summarized as follows (in units of GeV) [67]:
$ \begin{aligned}[b] m_{B^\pm/B^0/B_s^0} =\, & 5.279/5.280/5.367,\\ m_{D^\pm/D^0/D_s^\pm} =\,& 1.870/1.865/1.968, \\ m_{K^\pm/K^0} =\, &0.494/0.498, \\ m_{\rho(1450)} =\,& 1.465, \\ m_{\rho(1700)} =\,& 1.720,\\ \Gamma_{\rho(1450)} =\, & 0.400\pm0.060, \\ \Gamma_{\rho(1700)} =\,& 0.250\pm0.100, \\ f_{B^{\pm,0}/B_s^0} =\, & 0.190/0.230,\\ f_{D^{\pm,0}/D_s^\pm} =\, & 0.213/0.250. \end{aligned} $
In addition, the mean lifetimes
$ \tau_{B^\pm/B^0/B^0_s} = 1.638/ $ $ 1.519/1.515 $ ps, and the Wolfenstein parameters for the CKM matrix$ A = 0.790^{+0.017}_{-0.012} $ ,$ \lambda = 0.22650\pm0.00048 $ ,$ \bar{\rho} = 0.141^{+0.016}_{-0.017} $ , and$ \bar{\eta} = 0.357\pm0.011 $ are also adopted as in Ref. [67].For the considered
$ B \to D \rho(1450)^+ \to D K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ decays, the PQCD predictions for the branching ratios of each case are the following:$ \begin{aligned}[b] & \mathcal{B}(B^+ \to {\bar{D}^0} [\rho(1450)^+\to] K^+ \bar{K}^0)\\ = &8.99^{+5.17}_{-3.07}(\omega_B) ^{+0.57}_{-0.52}(C_D)^{+0.57}_{-0.56}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+1.81}_{-1.65}(c^K_{\rho(1450)})\times 10^{-5}, \\ & \mathcal{B}(B^0 \to {D^-} [\rho(1450)^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0) \\= &5.02^{+3.34}_{-1.89}(\omega_B) ^{+0.46}_{-0.45}(C_D)^{+0.39}_{-0.34}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+1.01}_{-0.92}(c^K_{\rho(1450)})\times 10^{-5}, \\ & \mathcal{B}(B_s^0 \to {D_s^-} [\rho(1450)^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0) \\= &4.37^{+2.75}_{-1.56}(\omega_{B_s}) ^{+0.34}_{-0.33}(C_{D_s})^{+0.03}_{-0.03}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+0.88}_{-0.80}(c^K_{\rho(1450)})\times 10^{-5}, \end{aligned} $
(11) while the predicted branching ratios of same decays with the intermediate resonance
$ \rho(1700) $ are$ \begin{aligned}[b] & \mathcal{B}(B^+ \to {\bar{D}^0} [\rho(1700)^+\to] K^+ \bar{K}^0)\\ = &8.28^{+4.60}_{-2.81}(\omega_B) ^{+0.59}_{-0.46}(C_D)^{+0.61}_{-0.57}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+4.42}_{-3.35}(c^K_{\rho(1700)}) \times 10^{-5}, \\ & \mathcal{B}(B^0 \to {D^-} [\rho(1700)^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0)\\ = &4.00^{+2.60}_{-1.50}(\omega_B) ^{+0.38}_{-0.31}(C_D)^{+0.46}_{-0.34}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+2.04}_{-1.62}(c^K_{\rho(1700)})\times 10^{-5}, \\ & \mathcal{B}(B_s^0 \to {D_s^-} [\rho(1700)^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0) \\= &3.88^{+2.41}_{-1.38}(\omega_{B_s}) ^{+0.29}_{-0.28}(C_{D_s})^{+0.03}_{-0.03}(a^{0,s,t}_2)^{+1.98}_{-1.57}(c^K_{\rho(1700)})\times 10^{-5}. \\ \end{aligned} $
(12) All the results above are given in the energy range with the invariant mass of the
$ K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ pair varying between$ m_{K^+}+m_{\bar{K}^0} $ and$ m_B-m_D $ . The first two theoretical errors come from the uncertainties of the parameters$ \omega_{B_{(s)}} = 0.40 \pm 0.04\; (0.50 \pm 0.05) $ and$ C_{D_{(s)}} = 0.5\pm 0.1\; $ $ (0.4\pm0.1) $ in the distribution amplitudes for the B and D mesons, respectively; the errors from the uncertainties of Gegenbauer moments$ a^0_2 = 0.25\pm0.10 $ ,$ a^s_2 = 0.75\pm0.25 $ , and$ a^t_2 = -0.60\pm0.20 $ in the two-kaon system are added together as the third error; and the last one is due to the coefficient$ c^K_{\rho(1450)} = -0.156\pm0.015 $ or$c^K_{\rho(1700)} = -0.083\pm $ $ 0.019$ in the kaon timelike form factor. The errors from the uncertainties of other parameters are relatively small and have been neglected.From the calculations and the numerical results, one can conclude the following:
(1) The branching ratios of the considered quasi-two-body decays, which are expected to be large and measurable, are predicted to be in the order of
$ 10^{-5} $ numerically in the PQCD approach. We also test the contributions from the color-suppressed emission diagrams for$ B^+ \to {\bar{D}^0} [\rho(1450)^+\to] K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ and the annihilation diagrams for$ B^0 \to {D^-} [\rho(1450)^+ \to] K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ , and the corresponding branching ratios are obtained to be$ 2.18 \times 10^{-6} $ and$ 1.06 \times 10^{-6} $ , while the results become$ 6.92\times 10^{-5} $ and$ 6.45\times 10^{-5} $ , respectively, when considering only the color-allowed emission diagrams for those two decays. Although the interference between the different types of Feynman diagrams for each decay are non-negligible, the contributions from the diagrams with the emission of a kaon pair are still dominant as expected.(2) The PQCD predicted branching ratios of the decay modes with the subprocess
$ \rho(1700)^+\to K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ are not much smaller than the corresponding ones with the intermediate state$ \rho(1450)^+ $ . This is because the latter are suppressed in the phase space when considering the mass of the kaon pair$ m_{K^+}+m_{\bar{K}^0} $ is very close to$ m_{\rho(1450)}-\Gamma_{\rho(1450)} $ but considerably less than$ m_{\rho(1700)}-\Gamma_{\rho(1700)} $ in comparison. In contrast, the situation is quite different in the same B meson decays with the subprocesses$ \rho(1450) \to \pi\pi $ and$ \rho(1700) \to \pi\pi $ [70,89-93] on account of the impact on the phase space arising from the difference between the mass of the pion and kaon.(3) In the measurement by the Belle Collaboration [1], the branching fraction of the
$ B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ decay was determined to be$ (5.5\pm1.4\pm 0.8)\times 10^{-4} $ . Meanwhile, they also gave a branching ratio for$ B^0\to D^-K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ of$ (1.6\pm0.8\pm 0.3)\times 10^{-4} $ and set an upper limit as$ 3.1\times 10^{-4} $ at$ 90\% $ confidence level. With the center values of our predictions in Eqs. (11)–(12), we obtain the ratios$ \begin{eqnarray} \frac{\mathcal{B}(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \rho(1450)^+ [\to K^+ \bar{K}^0])} {\mathcal{B}(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+ \bar{K}^0)} = 16.35{\text{%}} \end{eqnarray} $
(13) and
$ \begin{eqnarray} \frac{\mathcal{B}(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 \rho(1700)^+ [\to K^+ \bar{K}^0])} {\mathcal{B}(B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+ \bar{K}^0)} = 15.05{\text{%}}. \end{eqnarray} $
(14) Similarly, the ratios become
$ 31.38\% $ and$ 25.00\% $ for the$ B^0 \to D^- K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ decay mode. Since there are still large uncertainties in the branching fraction of$ B^0 \to D^- K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ presented by Belle, more precise measurements for this three-body channel are needed. Nevertheless, the above results indicate that the contributions from charged$ \rho(1450) $ and$ \rho(1700) $ can be important in the relevant three-body B meson decays.(4) In our previous work [78], the virtual contribution for
$ \rho(770) $ in$ B\to DKK $ was studied, and the center values of the branching ratios for the decays$ B^+ \to {\bar{D^0}} \rho(770)^+ $ ,$ B^0 \to {D^-} \rho(770)^+ $ , and$ B_s^0 \to {D_s^-} \rho(770)^+ $ with the subprocess$ \rho(770)^+\to K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ are predicted to be$ 1.18 \times 10^{-4} $ ,$ 7.93 \times 10^{-5} $ , and$ 6.06 \times 10^{-5} $ , respectively. Comparing those results with the numerical results in this study, two conclusions can be obtained. On the one hand, the contribution from the tail of$ \rho(770) $ is still large and cannot be ignored in the P-wave$ K^+ \bar{K}^0 $ system. On the other hand, limited by the phase space for$ KK $ production in the decay of the$ \rho(770) $ meson, the contributions for$ KK $ pair from the excited states$ \rho(1450) $ and$ \rho(1700) $ are more close to that of$ \rho(770) $ compared with the corresponding ones in the$ \pi\pi $ system. Therefore, it is possible to find the resonances$ \rho^+(1450) $ and$ \rho^+(1700) $ in the$ KK $ channel, and the concerned$ B\to DKK $ decays can be employed to study the properties of those excited ρ mesons. Interestingly, the$ KK_S $ invariant mass spectrum for the$ B^+ \to \bar{D}^0 K^+ K^0_S $ decay presented by Belle showed a peak around$ 1.2 $ GeV [1]. It indicates that other possible resonances, such as$ a_0(980) $ and$ a_2(1320) $ , will contribute to this region in addition to$ \rho(770) $ and$ \rho(1450) $ . Moreover, the interference between$ \rho(770) $ and$ \rho(1450) $ can increase or decrease the total contributions from these two resonances. We leave these possible contributions for the kaon pair to future studies due to the lack of precise parameters of the kaon time-like form factor, and more accurate measurements for this decay will help to test the$ KK $ distribution close to the threshold determined by Belle.
Resonances ρ(1450)+ and ρ(1700)+ in B → DKK decays
- Received Date: 2021-12-27
- Available Online: 2022-05-15
Abstract: The contributions for the kaon pair from the intermediate states