Resonant contribution of the three-body decay process $ {{\bar B}_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P }$ in perturbative QCD

Figures(3) / Tables(2)

Get Citation
Gang Lü, Chang Chang Zhang, Yan-Lin Zhao and Li-Ying Zhang. Resonant contribution of the three-body decay process $ {\bar B}_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ in perturbation QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad0e03
Gang Lü, Chang Chang Zhang, Yan-Lin Zhao and Li-Ying Zhang. Resonant contribution of the three-body decay process $ {\bar B}_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ in perturbation QCD[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad0e03 shu
Milestone
Received: 2023-10-29
Article Metric

Article Views(522)
PDF Downloads(16)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Resonant contribution of the three-body decay process $ {{\bar B}_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P }$ in perturbative QCD

  • 1. College of Science, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Abstract: We investigate CP violation in the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi(\rho,\omega) P \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}P $ by considering the interference effects of $ \phi\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $, $ \rho\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $, and $ \omega\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $within the framework of the perturbative QCD method (P refers to π, K, η, and $ \eta' $ pseudoscalar mesons). We analyze the mixings of $ \phi-\rho^{0} $, $ \phi-\omega $, and $ \omega-\rho^{0} $ and provide the amplitudes of the quasi-two-body decay processes. The CP violation for the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ decay process is obvious in the ranges of the three vector meson interferences. Meanwhile, the localized CP violation can be found to compare with the experimental results from the three-body decay process at the LHC in the near future.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • CP violation is a fascinating phenomenon in particle physics that has puzzled us for decades. The standard model (SM) of particle physics provides a framework for understanding CP violation; however, there are still many unanswered questions [1]. One area of research focuses on the search for new sources of CP violation beyond the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. This involves studying rare decays and interactions between particles to search for deviations from SM predictions. Another approach is to study CP violation in different types of particles, such as neutrinos and mesons. Despite these efforts, much remains unknown about CP violation.

      In as early as 2012, the LHCb Collaboration confirmed the existence of CP violation in several three-body decay studies of B mesons and found that the local phase space of $ \bar B^{\pm} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{\pm} $ decay channels had large direct CP violation, which was an interesting phenomenon at the time [2, 3]. This phenomenon was later found to be explained by intermediate state resonances between different isospin mesons. The $ \bar B^{\pm} \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{\pm} $ decay process was studied using $ \rho-\omega $ mixed resonance and found significant CP violation in the invariant mass $ m(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})=0.77 $ GeV, which coincides with the position and degree of local CP violation [4]. There is no doubt that the three-body decay of heavy mesons is more complex than the two-body case, with one reason being that they receive both resonant and non-resonant contributions during the decay process. The existing experimental results show that CP asymmetry in some local regions of phase space may be more obvious. Similarly, the LHCb observed large asymmetries in local regions in $ B^{ \pm} \rightarrow K^{ \pm} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} $ and $ B^{ \pm} \rightarrow K^{ \pm} K^{+} K^{-} $. The invariant mass spectra of $ B^{ \pm} \rightarrow K^{ \pm} \pi^{+} \pi^{-} $ decays in the region $ 0.08<m_{\pi^{+} \pi^{-}}^{2}<0.66 ~\mathrm{GeV}^{2} / c^{4} $ and $ m_{K^{ \pm} \pi^{\mp}}^{2}< 15 ~\mathrm{GeV}^{2} / c^{4} $, and $ B^{ \pm} \rightarrow K^{ \pm} K^{+} K^{-} $ decays in the region $ 1.2<m_{K^{+} K^{-} \text {low }}^{2}<2.0 ~\mathrm{GeV}^{2} / c^{4} $ and $ m_{K^{+} K^{-} \text {high }}^{2}< 15\; \mathrm{GeV}^{2} / c^{4} $ [5]. These local apparent CP asymmetries are interesting. Currently, the phenomenon of CP asymmetry in the three-body decay process of $ B_s $ mesons remains relatively unexplored, with limited research from both theoretical and experimental perspectives.

      This study aims to calculate the CP violation of the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ decay process via the perturbative QCD (PQCD) method because the Sudakov factor in PQCD effectively depresses the non-perturbative contribution and absorbs the non-perturbative part into the universal hadronic wave function [6]. Moreover, this method is self-consistent in the two-body non-leptonic decay process of B mesons and has been proved to exhibit the large CP violation found in experiments [7]. Indeed, the corresponding two-body decay process of the B meson has been well-established and developed into various three-body decay processes, and we can treat three-body decay processes using the method of quasi-two body decay processes [8, 9]. In recent years, an increasing number of analyses on precious measurements of branching ratios and CP violation in three-body decay processes have been performed by BaBar [10], Belle II [11], CLEO [12], and LHCb, which provides a great platform to test the SM and search new physical signals. In this study, we take the method of quasi-two-body decay processes to calculate the CP violation of the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ process under the mixing mechanism of $ \phi\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $, $ \rho^{0}\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $, and $ \omega\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $.

      The motivation for investigating the resonance effect among three particles originates from the adjacent masses of $ \phi(1020) $, ω(782), and $ \rho^{0} $(770). The hybrid mechanism, primarily rooted in the vector meson dominance (VMD) model, is founded on vector mesons. This process involves the integration of vector meson contributions within the photon propagator in vacuum, where vector mesons are regarded as propagators interacting with photons. The fundamental postulate of this model posits that vector mesons are the primary constituents, suggesting that the hadronic element of photon vacuum polarization precisely constitutes a vector meson that is bound by quark-antiquark pairs [13, 14]. By incorporating information on $ K^{+}K^{-} $ production and considering the constraints imposed by isospin symmetry, the quark model, and the OZI rule, it becomes feasible to disentangle amplitudes with isospin $ I=1 $ and $ I=0 $ components. $ \phi(1020) $ and ω(782) match the isospin $ I=0 $ component. The $ I=1 $ component derives from $ \rho^{0}(770) $. In this study, the ideal field of intermediate states is transformed into a computable physical field through the application of a unitary matrix. Additionally, we investigate localized CP violation within the hybrid resonance range to facilitate meaningful future comparisons with experimental results.

      We present our work in six parts. The mechanism of three vector meson mixing is introduced in Section II. In Section III, we initially investigate CP violation arising from the involvement of the mixing mechanism in the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi (\rho^{0}, \omega) P \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $. Subsequently, we present a formalism for local CP violation. In Section IV, we introduce the amplitude formalism within the framework of the PQCD method, along with the fundamental functions and associated parameters. Additionally, we provide an evaluation of both the magnitude and integrated form of CP violation. An analysis of the data results can be found in Section V. Finally, we engage in a comprehensive discussion and provide a concise summary of our findings.

    II.   MECHANISM OF THREE VECTOR MESON MIXING
    • Positive and negative electrons annihilate into photons and then are polarized in a vacuum to form the mesons $ \phi (1020) $, $ \rho^0(770) $, and $ \omega(782) $, which can also decay into a $ K^{+} K^{-} $ pair. Meanwhile, the momentum can also be passed through the VMD model [15, 16]. Because the intermediate state particle is an un-physical state, we must convert it into a physical field from an isospin field through the matrix R [17]. Then, we can obtain the physical states of ϕ, $ \rho^{0} $, and ω. Note that there is no $ \phi- \rho^{0}- \omega $ mixing in the physical state, and we neglect the contribution of the high-order term [18]. The physical states $ \phi- \rho^{0}- \omega $ can be expressed as linear combinations of the isospin states $ \phi_{I}- \rho^{0}_{I}- \omega_{I} $. This relationship can be represented by the following matrix:

      $ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \left ( \begin{array}{lllll} \rho^0\\ \omega\\ \phi \end{array} \right ) = R(s) \left ( \begin{array}{lll} \rho^0_I\\ \omega_I\\ \phi_I \end{array} \right ), \end{array} $

      (1)

      where

      $ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} R = \left ( \begin{array}{lll} \langle \rho_{I}|\rho \rangle & \quad \langle\omega_{I}|\rho \rangle & \quad \langle\phi_{I}|\rho \rangle \\[0.2cm] \langle\rho_{I}|\omega \rangle & \quad \langle\omega_{I}|\omega \rangle & \quad \langle\phi_{I}|\omega \rangle\\[0.2cm] \langle\rho_{I}|\phi \rangle & \quad \langle\omega_{I}|\phi \rangle & \quad \langle\phi_{I}|\phi \rangle \end{array} \right ).\\ \end{array} $

      (2)

      The change between the physical and isospin fields in the intermediate state of the decay process is related by the matrix R. The off-diagonal elements of R present information on $ \phi- \rho^{0}- \omega $ mixing. Based on the isospin representation of $ \phi_{I} $, $ \rho_{I} $, and $ \omega_{I} $, the isospin vector $|I,I_{3} \rangle$ can be constructed, where $ I_3 $ denotes the third component of isospin. The variables i and j are used to denote the physical state of the particle and the isospin basis vector, respectively. According to the orthogonal normalization relationship, we can derive the following: $\sum_{j}|j \rangle \langle j|= \sum_{j_{I}}\left|j_{I}\rangle \langle j_{I}\right|=I,$ and $\langle j\left|i \rangle = \langle j_{I}\right| i_{I} \rangle =\delta_{j i}$. We use the notation $ F_{V_iV_j} $ to denote the mixing parameter, where $ V_i $ and $ V_j $ represent one of the three vector particles. Then, the transformation matrix R can be converted as follows:

      $ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} R=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -F_{\rho \omega}(s) & -F_{\rho \phi}(s) \\ F_{\rho \omega}(s) & 1 & -F_{\omega \phi}(s) \\ F_{\rho \phi}(s) & F_{\omega \phi}(s) & 1 \end{array}\right). \end{array} $

      (3)

      From the translation of the two representations, the physical states can be written as

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi=&F_{\rho\phi }(s) \rho_{I}^{0}+F_{\omega \phi}(s) \omega_{I}+\phi_{I}, \\ \omega=&F_{ \rho\omega }(s) \rho_{I}^{0}+\omega_{I} -F_{\omega \phi}(s) \phi_{I}, \\ \rho^{0}=&\rho_{I}^{0}-F_{\rho\omega }(s) \omega_{I}-F_{\rho\phi }(s) \phi_{I}. \end{aligned} $

      (4)

      The relationship between the mixing parameters $ \Pi_{V_{i} V_{j}} $ and $ F_{V_{i}V_{j}} $ can be deduced from the equations

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] F_{\rho \omega}=&\frac{\Pi_{\rho \omega}}{s_{\rho}-s_{\omega}},\\ F_{\rho \phi}=&\frac{\Pi_{\rho \phi}}{s_{\rho}-s_{\phi}},\\ F_{\omega \phi}=&\frac{\Pi_{\omega \phi}}{s_{\omega}-s_{\phi}}. \end{aligned} $

      (5)

      The relationship $ F_{V_{i} V_{j}} $=$ -F_{V_{j} V_{V_{i}}} $ can be found. The inverse propagator of the vector meson, denoted as $ s_V $ ($ V = \phi, \rho $, or ω), is defined such that $ s_{V}=s-m_{V}^{2}+\mathrm{i} m_{V} \Gamma_{V} $. The variables $ m_V $ and $ \Gamma_{V} $ represent the mass and decay rate of the vector mesons, respectively. Meanwhile, $ \sqrt{s} $ denotes the invariant mass of the $ K^{+}K^{-} $ pairs.

      In this study, the momentum dependence of the mixing parameters $ \Pi_{V_{i} V_{j}} $ of $ V_{i}V_{j} $ mixing is introduced to obtain the obvious s dependence. The mixing parameter $\Pi_{\rho \omega }=-4470 \pm 250 \pm 160-{\rm i}(5800 \pm 2000 \pm 1100) \mathrm{MeV}^{2}$ is obtained near the ρ meson, as recently determined precisely by Wolfe and Maltnan [1921]. The mixing parameter $\Pi_{\omega \phi}=19000+{\rm i}(2500 \pm 300) \mathrm{MeV}^{2}$ is obtained near the ϕ muon, and the mixing parameter $\Pi_{\phi\rho}=720 \pm 180 - {\rm i}(870 \pm 320) \mathrm{MeV}^{2}$ is obtained near the ϕ meson [22]. Then, we define

      $ \begin{eqnarray} \widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\omega}=\frac{s_{\rho}\Pi_{\rho\omega}}{s_{\rho}-s_{\omega}}, \; \; \widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\phi}=\frac{s_{\rho}\Pi_{\rho\phi}}{s_{\rho}-s_{\phi}}, \; \; \widetilde{\Pi}_{\phi\omega}=\frac{s_{\phi}\Pi_{\phi\omega}}{s_{\phi}-s_{\omega}}. \end{eqnarray} $

      (6)
    III.   CP VIOLATION IN THE $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi $ ($ \rho^{0} $, ω) $ P \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ DECAY PROCESS

      A.   Resonance effect from $ V\rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $

    • We present decay diagrams (a)-(i) of the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi (\rho^{0} $, $ \omega) P \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} P $ process in Fig. 1, aiming to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mixing mechanism.

      Figure 1.  Decay diagrams of the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi (\rho^{0} $, $ \omega) P \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ process.

      In the above decay diagrams, the decay processes depicted in (a), (d), and (g) represent direct decay modes, where $ K^{+} K^{-} $ are produced through ϕ, $ \rho^0 $, and ω, respectively. The quasi-two-body approach employed in this study is evident from the aforementioned diagrams. Compared to the direct decay processes depicted in diagrams (a), (d), and (g) of Fig. 1, the $ K^{+} K^{-} $ pair can also be generated through a distinct mixing mechanism. The black dots in the figure represent the resonance effect between these two mesons, denoted by the mixing parameter $ \Pi_{V_{i} V_{j}} $. Although the contribution from this mixing mechanism is relatively small compared to other diagrams in Fig. 1, it must be considered.

      The amplitude of the $ \bar{B}_{s} \rightarrow \phi $ ($ \rho^{0}, \omega $) $ P \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ decay channel can be characterized in the following manner:

      $ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} A=\left \langle K^+K^-P\left | H^{T} \right | \bar{B}_{s} \right \rangle +\left \langle K^+K^-P\left | H^{P} \right | \bar{B}_{s} \right \rangle, \end{array} $

      (7)

      where the quantities $ \left \langle K^{+}K^{-}P\left | H^{P} \right | \bar{B}_{s} \right \rangle $ and $ \left \langle K^{+}K^{-}P\left | H^{T} \right | \bar{B}_{s} \right \rangle $ represent the amplitudes associated with penguin-level and tree-level contributions, respectively. The propagator of the intermediate vector meson can be transformed from the diagonal matrix to the physical state after applying the R matrix transformation. Neglecting higher order terms, the amplitudes can be as demonstrated as

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \langle K^+ K^- P\left|H^{T}\right| \bar B_{s}\rangle= & \frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}}t_{\phi} +\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}s_{\phi}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\phi}t_{\phi} +\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega}s_{\phi}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\omega\phi}t_{\phi} \\&+\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}}t_{\rho} +\frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}s_{\rho}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\phi\rho}t_{\rho} +\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega}s_{\rho}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\omega\rho}t_{\rho} \\ &+\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega}}t_{\omega} +\frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}s_{\omega}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\phi\omega}t_{\omega} +\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}s_{\omega}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\omega}t_{\omega}, \end{aligned} $

      (8)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \langle K^+ K^- P\left|H^{P}\right| \bar B_{s}\rangle= & \frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}}p_{\phi} +\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}s_{\phi}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\phi}p_{\phi} +\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega}s_{\phi}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\omega\phi}p_{\phi}\\ & +\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}}p_{\rho} +\frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}s_{\rho}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\phi\rho}p_{\rho} +\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega s_{\rho}}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\omega\rho}p_{\rho}\\ & +\frac{g_{\omega}}{s_{\omega}}p_{\omega} +\frac{g_{\phi}}{s_{\phi}s_{\omega}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\phi\omega}p_{\omega} +\frac{g_{\rho}}{s_{\rho}s_{\omega}}\widetilde{\Pi}_{\rho\omega}p_{\omega}, \end{aligned} $

      (9)

      where the tree-level (penguin-level) amplitudes $ t_{\rho}\left(p_{\rho}\right) $, $ t_{\omega}\left(p_{\omega}\right) $, and $ t_{\phi}\left(p_{\phi}\right) $ correspond to the decay processes $ \bar B_s \rightarrow \rho^0 P $, $ \bar B_s \rightarrow \omega P $, and $ \bar B_s \rightarrow \phi P $, respectively. Here, $ s_V $ represents the inverse propagator of the vector meson V [23]. Moreover, $ g_{V} $ represents the coupling constant derived from the decay process of $ V \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} $ and can be expressed as $ \sqrt{2}g_{{\rho}k^{+} k^{-}}=\sqrt{2}g_{\omega k^{+} k^{-}}=-g_{\phi k^{+} k^{-}}=4.54 $ [24].

      The differential parameter for CP asymmetry can be expressed as follows:

      $ A_{CP}=\frac{\left| A \right|^2-\left| \overline{A} \right|^2}{\left| A \right|^2+\left| \overline{A} \right|^2}. $

      (10)
    • B.   Localized CP violation of $ A^{\Omega}_{CP} $

    • In this study, we perform the integral calculation of A$ _{CP} $ to facilitate future experimental comparisons. For the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi P $, the amplitude is given by $ M_{\bar B _{s}\rightarrow \phi P}^{\lambda}=\alpha p_{\bar B} \cdot \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) $, where $ p_{\bar B_{s}} $ represents the momenta of the $ \bar B_{s} $ meson, $ \epsilon $ denotes the polarization vector of ϕ, and λ corresponds to its polarization. The parameter α remains independent of λ. Similarly, in the decay process $ \phi \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $, we can express $ M_{\phi \rightarrow K^{-} K^{+}}^{\lambda}=g_{\phi}\epsilon(\lambda)\left(p_1-p_2\right) $, where $ p_1 $ and $ p_2 $ denote the momenta of the produced $ K^{+} $ and $ K^{-} $ particles from ϕ, respectively. Here, the parameter $ g_\phi $ represents an effective coupling constant for $ \phi \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $. Regarding the dynamics of meson decay, the polarization vector of a vector meson satisfies $ \sum_{\lambda=0,\pm 1}\epsilon^\lambda_\mu(p)(\epsilon^\lambda_\nu(p))^*=-(g_{\mu\nu}-p_\mu p_\nu/m_V^2) $. As a result, we obtain the total amplitude for the decay process $ \bar B_s \rightarrow \phi P\rightarrow K^{+}K^-P $ [4, 25, 26]:

      $ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \begin{aligned} A &=\alpha p_{\bar B_{s}}^{\mu} \frac{\sum_{\lambda} \epsilon_{\mu}^{*}(\lambda) \epsilon_{\nu}(\lambda)}{s_{\phi}} g_{\phi kk}\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)^{\nu} \\ &=\frac{g_{\phi kk} \alpha}{s_{\phi}} \cdot p_{\bar B_{s}}^{\mu}\left[g_{\mu \nu}-\frac{\left(p_{1}+p_{2}\right)_{\mu}\left(p_{1}+p_{2}\right)_{\nu}}{s}\right]\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)^{\nu} \\ &=\frac{g_{\phi kk}}{s_{\phi}} \cdot \frac{M_{\bar B_{s}\rightarrow \phi \pi^{0}}^{\lambda}}{p_{\bar B_{s}} \cdot \epsilon^{*}} \cdot\left(\Sigma-s^{\prime}\right) \\ &=\left(\Sigma-s^{\prime}\right) \cdot \mathcal{A}. \end{aligned} \end{array} $

      (11)

      The high ($ \sqrt{s^\prime} $) and low $ \sqrt{s} $ ranges are defined to calculate the invariant mass of $ K^{-} K^{+} $. By setting a fixed value for s, we can determine an appropriate value for $ s^\prime $ that fulfills the equation $\Sigma=\left(s_{\max }^\prime+s_{\min }^\prime\right)/2$, where $ { s}_{ \max }^{ \prime }({ s}_{ \min }^{\prime}) $ denotes the maximum (minimum) value.

      Utilizing the principles of three-body kinematics, we can deduce the local CP asymmetry for the decay $ \bar{B}_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} P $ within a specific range of invariant mass:

      $ A_{C P}^{\Omega}=\frac{\int_{s_{1}}^{s_{2}} \mathrm{\; d} s \int_{s_{1}^{\prime}}^{s_{2}^{\prime}} \mathrm{d} s^{\prime}\left(\Sigma-s^{\prime}\right)^{2}\left(|\mathcal{A}|^{2}-|\overline{\mathcal{A}}|^{2}\right)}{\int_{s_{1}}^{s_{2}} \mathrm{\; d} s \int_{s_{1}^{\prime}}^{s_{2}^{\prime}} \mathrm{d} s^{\prime}\left(\Sigma-s^{\prime}\right)^{2}\left(|\mathcal{A}|^{2}+|\overline{\mathcal{A}}|^{2}\right)}. $

      (12)

      Our calculation considers the dependence of $\Sigma=\left(s_{\max }^{\prime}+s_{\min }^{\prime}\right)/2$ on $ s^{\prime} $, assuming that $ s_{\max }^{\prime}>s^{\prime}>s_{\min }^{\prime} $ represents an integral interval of high invariant mass for the $ K^{-} K^{+} $ meson pair, and $ \int_{s_{1}^{\prime}}^{s_{2}^{\prime}} \mathrm{d}s^\prime(\Sigma-s')^{2} $ represents a factor dependent on $ s' $. The correlation between Σ and $ s' $ can be easily determined through kinematic analysis because $ s' $ only varies on a small scale. Therefore, we can consider Σ as a constant. This allows us to cancel out the term $ \int_{s_1^\prime}^{ s_2^\prime }\mathrm{d}s^\prime (\Sigma-s')^{2} $ in both the numerator and denominator, resulting in $ A_{C P}^{\Omega} $ no longer depending on the high invariant mass of positive and negative particles.

    IV.   AMPLITUDES OF QUASI-TWO-BODY DECAY PROCESSES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF PERTURBATIVE QCD

      A.   Formulation of calculations

    • The three-body decay process is accompanied by intricate and multifaceted dynamical mechanisms. The PQCD method is known for its efficacy in handling perturbation corrections. It has been successfully applied to two-body non-light decay processes and also exhibits promise for quasi-two-body decay processes. In the framework of PQCD, within the rest frame of a heavy B meson, the decay process involves the production of two light mesons with significantly large momenta that exhibit rapid motion. The dominance of hard interactions in this decay amplitude arises owing to insufficient time to exchange soft gluons with final-state mesons. Given the high velocity of these final-state mesons, a hard gluon imparts momentum to the light spectator quark within the B meson, resulting in the formation of a rapidly moving final-state meson. Consequently, this hard interaction is described by six quark operators. The nonperturbative dynamics are encapsulated within the meson wave function, which can be extracted through experimental measurements. However, employing perturbation theory allows for the computation of this hard contribution. Quasi-two-body decay can be computed by defining the intermediate state of decay.

      Using the quasi-two-body decay method, the total amplitude of $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi $ ($ \rho^{0} $, ω) $ \pi^{0} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} \pi^{0} $ is composed of two components: $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi $ ($ \rho^{0} $, ω) $ \pi^{0} $ and ϕ ($ \rho^{0} $, $ \omega) \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $. In this study, we illustrate the methodology of the quasi-two-body decay process using the example of $ \bar B_{s}\rightarrow \phi\pi^0\rightarrow K^+K^-\pi^0 $, based on matrix elements involving $ V_{tb} $, $ V_{ts}^{*} $, and $ V_{ub} $,$ V_{ub}^{*} $.

      $ \begin{aligned}[b]\\[-6pt] \sqrt{2}A\left(\bar{B}_{s} \rightarrow \pi^{0} \phi\left(\phi\rightarrow K^+K^-\right)\right)=&\frac{\left.G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\phi} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)\right.}{\sqrt{2} s_{\phi}}\\ &\times \bigg\{V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\left[f_{\pi} F_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}(a_{2})+M_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}(C_{2})\right]\bigg.\\ &\left.-V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{\pi} F_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} a_{9}-\frac{3}{2} a_{7}\right)+M_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}+\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)\right]\right\},\\ \end{aligned} $

      (13)

      where $ P_{\bar B_s} $, $ p_{k^{+}} $, and $ p_{k^{-}} $ are the momenta of $ \bar B_s $, $ K^{+} $, and $ K^{-} $, respectively, $ C_i $ ($ a_i $) is the Wilson coefficient (associated Wilson coefficient), $ \epsilon $ is the polarization of the vector meson, $ G_F $ is the Fermi constant, and $ f_{\pi} $ refers to the decay constants of π [27]. Furthermore, $ F_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L} $ and $ M_{\bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L} $ represent emission graphs that are factorable and non-factorable, respectively, and $ F_{a n n}^{L L} $ and $ M_{a n n}^{L L} $ represent annihilation graphs that are factorable and non-factorable, respectively. $ LL $, $ LR $, and $ SP $ correspond to three flow structures [6].

      The additional representations of the three-body decay amplitudes that should be considered to calculate CP violation through the mixed mechanism in this study are as follows:

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] 2 A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \right.\left.\rho^{0}\left(\rho^{0} \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \pi^{0}\right) =& \frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda = 0, \pm 1}\epsilon(\lambda) g_{\rho} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\rho}} \\ &\times \left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\left[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}(a_{2})+M_{a n n}^{L L}(C_{2})+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n }^{L L '}(a_{2})+M_{a n n}^{L L'}(C_{2})\right] \right. \\ &- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[ f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{3}+a_{9}\right)\right.\left.-f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L R}\left(a_{5}+a_{7}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{4}+C_{10}\right)\right.\\ &-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(C_{6}+C_{8}\right)+\left[\pi^+ \leftrightarrow \rho^-\right] +f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(a_{3}+a_{9}\right)-f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L R'}\left(a_{5}+a_{7}\right) \\ &\left.\left.+M_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(C_{4}+C_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P'}\left(C_{6}+C_{8}\right) +\left[\rho^+ \leftrightarrow \pi^-\right] \right] \right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (14)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] 2A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{0}\omega\left(\omega \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\omega} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\omega}} \\ \times & \left\{V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*} M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(c_{2}\right)-V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} c_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(\frac{3}{2} c_{8}\right)+\left[\pi^{0} \leftrightarrow \omega\right]\right]\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (15)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow K^{0}\phi\left(\phi \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\phi} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\phi}} \\ &\times \left\{- V_{t b} V_{t d}^{*}\left[f_{\phi} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(a_{3}+a_{5}-\frac{1}{2} a_{7}-\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)+f_{K} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(a_{4}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \right. \right.\end{aligned} $

      $ \begin{aligned}[b]\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad &\left. \left.-f_{K} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{S P}\left(a_{6}-\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(C_{4}-\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(C_{3}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}\right) \right.\right.\\ &\left.\left. -M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{S P}\left(C_{6}-\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L R}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right)+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{4}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \right.\right.\\ &\left.\left. -f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{S P}\left(a_{6}-\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{3}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}\right)-M_{a n n}^{L R}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right) \right]\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (16)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \sqrt{2}A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow K^{0}\rho\left(\rho \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\phi} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\rho}}\\ & \times \left\{ V_{u b} V_{u d}^{*}\left[f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\right]- V_{t b} V_{t d}^{*}\left[ M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L R}\left(-C_{5}+\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right)\right.\right.\\ & \left.+f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(-a_{4}+\frac{3}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{10}+\frac{3}{2} a_{9}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{S P}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}\right) \right.\\ &\left.\left. +M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(-C_{3}+\frac{1}{2} C_{9}+\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(-a_{4}+\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \right.\right.\\ & \left.\left.+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{S P}\left(-a_{6}+\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(-C_{3}+\frac{1}{2} C_{9}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L R}\left(-C_{5}+\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right)\right]\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (17)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \sqrt{2}A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow K^{0}\omega\left(\omega \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\omega} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\omega}} \\ &\times \left\{V_{u b} V_{u d}^{*} \left[ f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\right] - V_{t b} V_{t d}^{*}\left[M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L R}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right) \right.\right.\\ &\left.+f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(2 a_{3}+a_{4}+2 a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right)\right.\\ & +M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{L L}\left(C_{3}+2 C_{4}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{3}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}\right)\\ &\left. -M_{B_{s} \rightarrow K}^{S P}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{4}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \right.\\&\left.\left.+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{S P}\left(a_{6}-\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L R}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right) \right]\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (18)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta\phi\left(\phi \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\phi} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\phi}} \times \left\{ \frac{\cos \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\bigg\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\left[f_{n} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\right] \bigg.\right.\\ &- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{n} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(2 a_{3}-2 a_{5}-\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right. \\ & \left.\left.+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{S P}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\}\\ &-\sin \theta\left\{- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{s} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L'}\left(a_{3}+a_{4}-a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}-\frac{1}{2} a_{9}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right)\right.\right. \\ & +M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{S P'}\left(C_{6}-\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(a_{3}+a_{4}-a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}-\frac{1}{2} a_{9}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \\ & +M_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(C_{3}+C_{4}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}-\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{S P'}\left(a_{6}-\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right) \\ & \left.\left.\left.-M_{a n n}^{L R'}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P'}\left(C_{6}-\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]+\left[\eta_{s} \leftrightarrow \phi\right]\right\}\right\} .\\ \end{aligned} $

      (19)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta \rho^{0}\left( \rho^{0} \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{ \rho} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{ \rho}} \\ &\times \left\{\frac{\cos \theta}{2}\left\{-V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} a_{9}-\frac{3}{2} a_{7}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right.\right. \\ & \left.+ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]+\left[\rho^{0} \leftrightarrow \eta_{n}\right]\right\}\\ &-\frac{\sin \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right. \\ &\left. \left.- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(\frac{3}{2} a_{7}+\frac{3}{2} a_{9}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{S P'}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\} \right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (20)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta \omega\left( \omega \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{ \omega} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{ \omega}} \\ &\times \left\{\frac{\cos \theta}{2}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right.\right. \\ & - V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right. \\ + & \left.\left.f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(2 a_{3}-2 a_{5}-\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right]+\left[\eta_{n} \leftrightarrow \omega\right]\right\}\\ &-\frac{\sin \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right. \\ & - V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(2 a_{3}+2 a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right. \\ & \left.\left.\left.+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{S P'}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\}\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (21)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta'\phi\left(\phi \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{\phi} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{\phi}} \\ &\times \left\{ \frac{\sin \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\bigg\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\left[f_{n} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\right] \bigg.\right.\\ &- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{n} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(2 a_{3}-2 a_{5}-\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right. \\ & \left.\left.+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{S P}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\}\\ &+\cos \theta\left\{- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{s} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{L L'}\left(a_{3}+a_{4}-a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}-\frac{1}{2} a_{9}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right)\right.\right. \\ & +M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \phi}^{S P'}\left(C_{6}-\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)+f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(a_{3}+a_{4}-a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}-\frac{1}{2} a_{9}-\frac{1}{2} a_{10}\right) \\ & +M_{a n n}^{L L'}\left(C_{3}+C_{4}-\frac{1}{2} C_{9}-\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{S P'}\left(a_{6}-\frac{1}{2} a_{8}\right) \\ & \left.\left.\left.-M_{a n n}^{L R'}\left(C_{5}-\frac{1}{2} C_{7}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P'}\left(C_{6}-\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]+\left[\eta_{s} \leftrightarrow \phi\right]\right\}\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (22)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta' \rho^{0}\left( \rho^{0} \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{ \rho} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{ \rho}} \\ &\times \left\{\frac{\sin \theta}{2}\left\{-V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} a_{9}-\frac{3}{2} a_{7}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right.\right. \\ & \left.+ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]+\left[\rho^{0} \leftrightarrow \eta_{n}\right]\right\}\\ &+\frac{\cos \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right. \\ &\left. \left.- V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{\rho} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(\frac{3}{2} a_{7}+\frac{3}{2} a_{9}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{S P'}\left(\frac{3}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\} \right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (23)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] A\left(\bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow \eta' \omega\left( \omega \rightarrow K^+ K^-\right) \right)=&\frac{G_{F} p_{\bar{B}_{s}^{0}} \cdot \sum_{\lambda=0, \pm 1} \epsilon(\lambda) g_{ \omega} \epsilon^{*}(\lambda) \cdot\left(p_{k^+}-p_{k^-}\right)}{ \sqrt{2} s_{ \omega}} \times \left\{\frac{\sin \theta}{2}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right.\right. \\ & - V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[M_{a n n}^{L L}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{a n n}^{S P}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right.\\& + \left.\left.f_{B_{s}} F_{a n n}^{L L}\left(2 a_{3}-2 a_{5}-\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right]+\left[\eta_{n} \leftrightarrow \omega\right]\right\}\\ &+\frac{\cos \theta}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{ V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}\bigg[f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(a_{2}\right)+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(C_{2}\right)\bigg]\right. - V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}\left[f_{\omega} F_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(2 a_{3}+2 a_{5}+\frac{1}{2} a_{7}+\frac{1}{2} a_{9}\right)\right. \\ & \left.\left.\left.+M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{L L'}\left(2 C_{4}+\frac{1}{2} C_{10}\right)-M_{B_{s} \rightarrow \eta_{s}}^{S P'}\left(2 C_{6}+\frac{1}{2} C_{8}\right)\right]\right\}\right\}. \end{aligned} $

      (24)

      where the form factor involving $ \eta_{s} $ is distinguished from $ \eta_{n} $ by introducing a prime distinction in the upper right corner of F and M with respect to $ \eta_{s} $.

    • B.   Input parameters

    • The $ V_{t b} $, $ V_{t s} $, $ V_{u b} $, $ V_{u s} $, $ V_{t d} $, and $ V_{u d} $ terms in the above equation are derived from the CKM matrix element within the framework of the SM. The CKM matrix, whose elements are determined through experimental observations, can be expressed in terms of the Wolfenstein parameters A, ρ, λ, and η: $ V_{t b} V_{t s}^{*}=\lambda $, $V_{u b} V_{u s}^{*}= A \lambda^{4}(\rho- {\rm i} \eta)$, $V_{u b} V_{u d}^{*}=A \lambda^{3}(\rho- {\rm i} \eta)\left(1-\dfrac{\lambda^{2}}{2}\right)$, $V_{t b} V_{t d}^{*}=A \lambda^{3}(1- \rho+{\rm i} \eta)$. The most recent values for the parameters in the CKM matrix are $ \lambda=0.22650\pm 0.00048 $, $ A=0.790_{-0.012}^{+0.017} $, $ \bar{\rho}=0.141_{-0.017}^{+0.016} $, and $ \bar{\eta}=0.357\pm 0.011 $. Here, we define $ \bar{\rho}=\rho\left(1-\dfrac{\lambda^{2}}{2}\right) $ and $ \bar{\eta}=\eta\left(1-\dfrac{\lambda^{2}}{2}\right) $ [28]. The physical quantities involved in the calculation are presented in the Table 1.

      $ m_{B_{s}} $ = $ 5.367 $ $ m_{\eta} $ = $ 0.548 $ $ \enspace f_{\phi} $ = $ 0.23 $ $ \:f_{k} $ = $ 0.156 $ $ \enspace \; f_{\omega}^{T} $ = $ 0.14 $
      $ m_{K^0} = 0.498 $ $ m_{\eta'} $ = $ 0.958 $ $ f_{\phi}^{T} $ = $ 0.22 $ $ \enspace f_{\rho} $ = $ 0.209 $ $ f_{\omega} $ = $ 0.195 $
      $ m_{\phi} $ = $ 1.019 $ $ m_{\pi^0} $ = $ 0.13498 $ $ f_{\pi} $ = $ 0.13 $ $ f_{\rho}^{T} $ = $ 0.165 $ $ \enspace \,\; \Gamma_{\rho} $ = $ 0.15 $
      $ m_{\omega} $ = $ 0.782 $ $ m_{W} $ = $ 80.385 $ $ f_{n} $ = $ 0.17 $ $ f_{B_{s}} $ = $ 0.23 $ $ \Gamma_{\omega} $ = $ 8.49 \times 10^{-3} $
      $ m_{\rho} $ = $ 0.775 $ $ m_{\pi^\pm} $ = $ 0.13957 $ $ f_{s} $ = $ 0.14 $ $ C_{F} $ = $ 4 / 3 $ $ \Gamma_{\phi} $ = $ 4.23 \times 10^{-3} $

      Table 1.  Remaining parameters [29, 30] (in units of GeV).

    V.   ANALYSIS OF DATA RESULTS

      A.   Direct CP violation from the mixing of three vector mesons

    • Figures 2 and 3 show plots illustrating CP violation in the decay processes of $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{-}K^{+} P $, where we investigate the mixing of $ \rho-\omega-\phi $ particles. Figures 2 and 3 depict the variation in $ A_{CP} $ as a function of $ \sqrt{s} $, which represents the invariant mass of $ K^{+}K^{-} $. The central parameter values of the CKM matrix elements are used to obtain these results. The observed $ CP $ violation in these decay processes provides valuable insights into fundamental physics phenomena, such as vector meson interference.

      Figure 2.  Plot of $ A_{C P} $ as a function of $ \sqrt{s} $corresponding to the central parameter values of CKM matrix elements. The solid line (dashed line) corresponds to the decay channel $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} \pi (K^{0}) $.

      Figure 3.  Plot of $ A_{C P} $ as a function of $ \sqrt{s} $corresponding to the central parameter values of CKM matrix elements. The solid line (dashed line) corresponds to the decay channel $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} \eta (\eta') $.

      The maximum CP violation from the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}\pi $ in Fig. 2, with a value of $ -38\% $, occurs at an invariant mass of 1.02 GeV, which corresponds to the mass position of the ϕ meson. Additionally, small peaks are observed in the invariant mass range $ \rho^{0}-\omega $. Therefore, it can be concluded that the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}\pi $ plays a significant role in this decay channel. Furthermore, for the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} K^{0} $, a sharp variation in CP violation is observed when the invariant masses of $ K^{+}K^{-} $ pairs fall within the region around 0.75 GeV, reaching a peak value of $ -70\% $. In this case, these are the effects from the $ \rho^{0}-\omega $ mixing mechanism rather than contributions from the QCD penguin dominant decay $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi K^0 $. Consequently, interference effects are expected to occur within a range 0.7−0.8 GeV. It should be noted that only the tree graph contributes to the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi K^{0} $ decay. However, the mixed resonance effect between $ \phi-\omega-\rho $ leads to a smaller violation peak shift in the invariant mass position of the ϕ meson.

      Although the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}\eta (\eta') $ is more intricate, we first consider the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow V \eta(\eta') $ involving $ \eta(\eta') $. The physical states of η and $ \eta' $ mesons are composed of a mixture of flavor eigenstates, namely, $ \eta_{n} $ and $ \eta_{s} $. Furthermore, there is no contribution from penguin graphs in the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi \eta_{s} $; hence, the amplitude contribution of the decay $ B_s\to K^+K^-\eta (\eta^\prime) $ within this entire mixture is negligible. As depicted in Fig. 3, resonant interplay between the large CP violation in both invariant mass intervals ($ \rho^{0}-\omega $ and ϕ) ultimately leads to the observed effect shown in Fig. 3. In the figure, it is evident that the CP violation peak in $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} \eta(\eta') $ occurs with a magnitude of $ -74\% $ ($ -88\% $) near the $ 0.8 $ GeV range. This observation allows us to understand the trend of CP violation in these decay processes, which is advantageous for our research. Additionally, we can determine the invariant mass value of the $ K^{+}K^{-} $ pair during significant CP violation events, providing an opportunity for experimental measurement.

    • B.   Numerical results of localized integrated CP asymmetry

    • The relationship between CP violation and invariant mass in the decay process, as derived in the preceding section, provides valuable insights into the dynamics of CP violation. However, to comprehensively investigate regional CP violation for future experiments, we perform a local integration analysis of CP violation within the studied decay process. Consequently, Table 2 presents the localized CP violation for the aforementioned decay processes.

      Decay channel $ \phi-\rho-\omega $ mixing $ \phi-\rho $ mixing $ \phi-\omega $ mixing $ \rho-\omega $ mixing
      $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0} $ $ \mathrm{-0.124\pm 0.012} $ $ \mathrm{-0.126\pm 0.008} $ $ \mathrm{-0.147\pm0.004} $ $ \mathrm{-0.124\pm 0.010} $
      $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} K^{0} $ $ \mathrm{-0.001\pm 0.000} $ $ \mathrm{0.0003\pm 0.0001} $ $ \mathrm{0.0008\pm0.0002} $ $ \mathrm{0.169\pm 0.004} $
      $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta $ $ \mathrm{0.021\pm0.0001} $ $ \mathrm{0.0174\pm 0.0002} $ $ \mathrm{0.010\pm0.001} $ $ \mathrm{-0.237\pm 0.007} $
      $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta' $ $ \mathrm{-0.014\pm 0.005} $ $ \mathrm{-0.012\pm 0.008} $ $ \mathrm{-0.007\pm 0.002} $ $ \mathrm{-0.240\pm 0.005} $

      Table 2.  Peak local $(0.98~{\rm GeV} \leq \sqrt{s}\leq 1.06 ~{\rm GeV})$ integral of ${A}^{\Omega} _{CP}$ from different resonance ranges for the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi (K^{0},\eta,\eta') $ decay processes.

      According to Table 2, the integration range (0.98− 1.06 GeV) corresponds to the threshold of the $ V \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-} $ decay process. The resonance effect between different particles can lead to more pronounced CP violation phenomena in various energy intervals. However, considering the threshold effect for generating $ K^{+}K^{-} $ meson pairs, we provide the local integral values as shown in Table 2. To compare the similarities and differences between three-particle and two-particle resonance effects, we also present the local integral results of the CP violation under two-particle resonance in Table 2.

      In the $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0} $ decay process, the value of CP violation changes less in the resonance regions above the threshold values owing to any two-particle or three-particle mixing. Although the mixed resonance contributes a peak value of $ -38\% $ for the $ \bar{B}_{s}^{0} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0} $ decay process in Fig. 2, the local integral values have minimal variation within a specific range in comparison to the overall resonance interval. The values of $ A_{CP}^{\Omega} $ exhibit a consistent magnitude of approximately 0.124.

      The values of $ A_{CP}^{\Omega} $ are small because of contributions from $ \phi-\rho-\omega $, $ \phi-\rho $, and $ \phi-\omega $ mixing. However, a significant CP violation of 0.169 can be observed from the contribution of $ \rho-\omega $ mixing. This behavior changes in the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} K^{0} $ because it involves the QCD penguin dominant decay $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi K^{0} $ without a tree-level contribution. In this case, only the decay process involving intermediate states with $ \rho -\omega $ particles exhibits noticeable CP violation.

      The decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta(\eta') $ is also a special decay process, characterized by the presence of meson mixing between η and $ \eta' $. The process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi \eta_s $ is a QCD penguin dominant decay without a contribution from a tree diagram, whereas the process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow \phi \eta_n $ involves contributed tree and penguin diagrams. Thus, $ \eta_{s} $ and $ \eta_{n} $ mixing results in the presence of a smaller tree contribution for η ($ \eta' $). Consequently, the involvement of ϕ as an intermediate state in the decay process leads to a reduction in the value of $ A_{CP}^{\Omega} $. The CP violation induced by the decay process involving $ \rho-\omega $ mixing exhibits distinct characteristics, with a maximum value of $ -0.237 (-0.240) $ observed for the process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta $ ($ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta' $).

      Theoretical errors give rise to uncertainties in the results. In general, the major theoretical uncertainties arise from power corrections beyond the heavy quark limit, necessitating the inclusion of $ 1/m_b $ power corrections. Unfortunately, there are numerous possible $ 1/m_b $ power suppressed effects that are typically nonperturbative in nature and therefore not calculable using perturbation theory. Consequently, this scheme introduces additional sources of uncertainty. The first error arises from variations in the CKM parameters, and another is from hadronic parameters, such as the shape parameters, form factors, decay constants, and wave function of Bs mesons. The third error corresponds to selecting appropriate hard scales that characterize the size of next-to-leading order QCD contributions. By employing central values for these parameters, we initially compute numerical results for CP violation and subsequently incorporate errors based on the standard deviation in Table 2. We determine that the impact of mixing parameter errors on local CP violation is negligible compared to the overall CP asymmetry; therefore, this influence value will not be further discussed.

    VI.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
    • CP violation in the decay process of the $ \bar{B}_{s}^{0} $ meson is predicted through an invariant mass analysis of $ K^{+} K^{-} $ meson pairs within the resonance region, resulting from the mixing of ϕ, ω, and ρ mesons. We observe a sharp change in CP violation within the resonance regions of these mesons. Local CP violation is quantified by integrating over phase space. For the decay process $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \pi^{0} $, we find a local CP violation value around $ -0.12 $ arising from interference between ϕ, ω, and ρ mesons. In decays such as $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} K^{0} $, $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta $, and $ \bar B_{s} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} \eta' $, CP violation is observed owing to contributions from both two-meson and three-meson mixing processes. The local CP violation is large, particularly when involving ρ - ω mixing. Experimental detection of local CP violation can be achieved by reconstructing the resonant states of ϕ, ω, and ρ mesons within the resonance regions.

      We propose a quasi-two-body approach, namely, $ \bar{B}_{s}^{0}\rightarrow VP \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} P $, to elucidate the three-body decay mechanism of $ \bar{B}_{s}^{0}\rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} P $. During this process, V acts as an intermediate state and undergoes resonance with other particles, ultimately decaying into pairs of $ K^{+} K^{-} $ mesons. The three-body decay process is appropriately formulated using the quasi-two-body chain decay. We consider the $ B\rightarrow RP_3 $ decay process as a case study for analyzing quasi-two-body decays, where R represents an intermediate resonance state that can further decay into hadrons $ P_{1,2} $, and $ P_3 $ denotes another final hadron. The process under consideration can be factorized using the narrow width approximation. The expression for $ B\rightarrow RP_3 $ can be written as follows: $ \mathcal{B} (B\rightarrow RP_3\rightarrow P_1P_2P_3 ) =\mathcal{B} \left(B\rightarrow RP_3 \right) \mathcal{B} \left(B\rightarrow P_1P2 \right) $, which holds true due to the branching ratio. The effects of the small widths of ϕ, ρ, and ω in quasi-two-body decay processes into $ KK $ can be safely neglected. Considering the substantial decay rate of $ \rho(770) $, it is reasonable to perform a correction. Using the QCD factorization approach, the correction factor for the decays process $ B^{-}\rightarrow \rho(770)\pi^{-}\rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{-} $ is at the 7% level. The parameter $ \eta _R $ is introduced as a quantitative approximation between $ \varGamma \left(B\rightarrow RP_3 \right) \mathcal{B} \left(B\rightarrow P_1P_2 \right) $ and $ \varGamma \left(B\rightarrow RP_3\rightarrow P_1P_2P_3 \right) $ [31, 32]. When calculating the CP violation, this constant can be eliminated, thereby exerting no influence on our ultimate outcome.

      Recently, the LHCb experimental group made significant progress in investigating the three-body decay of B mesons and obtained noteworthy findings [33]. By analyzing previous experimental data, they measured direct CP violation in various decay modes such as $ B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-} K^\pm $, $ B^{\pm} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} K^\pm $, $ B^{\pm} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^\pm $, and $ B^{\pm} \rightarrow K^{+} K^{-}\pi^\pm $. Based on the LHCb experiments, future investigations will likely primarily focus on exploring the three-body decays of $ \bar{B}_s $.

Reference (33)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return