-
Here, we review the charged black hole solutions in EMS theory. To this end, we first write the action as follows [42, 62]:
$ S=\int {\rm d}^4x\sqrt{-g}\Big[R-2\nabla_\alpha\phi \nabla^\alpha\phi-K(\phi) F_{\alpha\beta}F^{\alpha\beta} -V(\phi) \Big] , $
with the covariant derivative
$ \nabla_\alpha $ , Ricci scalar R, and massless scalar field ϕ.$ F_{\alpha\beta} $ and$ K(\phi) $ refer to the electromagnetic field tensor and the function of scalar field, respectively, that describes the coupling function between the electromagnetic and dilaton fields.$ V(\phi) $ refers to the scalar potential associated with the cosmological constant Λ in the frame of the EMS theory and describes the black hole in the de-Sitter universe coupled with the dilaton field, that is,$V(\phi)=\Lambda\left({\rm e}^{2\phi}+4+{\rm e}^{-2\phi}\right)/3$ [63]. However, we further restrict ourselves to the black hole solution with vanishing cosmological constant, that is,$ V(\phi)=0 $ . With this in view, the metric describing a static and spherically symmetric black hole solution in the Schwarzschild coordinate system is then given by [62]$ {\rm d} s^2=-U(r) {\rm d} t^2+\frac{{\rm d}r^2}{U(r)}+f(r)\left({\rm d}\theta^2+\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\varphi^2\right) , $
(1) where
$ U(r) $ and$ f(r) $ refer to radial functions given in terms of the function$ K(\phi) $ that is written as$ K(\phi)=\frac{2e^{2\phi}}{\beta {\rm e}^{4\phi}+\beta-2\gamma}\, . $
(2) Hence, these two functions are written in the following forms:
$ \begin{aligned}[b] & f(r)=r^2\left(1+\frac{\gamma Q^2}{Mr}\right), \\ & U(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{\beta Q^2}{f(r)}\, , \end{aligned} $
(3) with mass M and electric charge Q of the black hole. We note that the new terms are given with β and γ, which are dimensionless constants of the static black hole solution in EMS theory. The metric functions
$ f(r) $ and$ U(r) $ reduce to the Schwarzschild case in the limit of$ \beta=0 $ and$ \gamma=0 $ , and to the Reissner-Nordström case in the limit of$ \gamma=0 $ and$ \beta=1 $ . However, it is worth noting that the functions$ f(r) $ and$ U(r) $ present the dilation solution in the limit of$ \beta=0 $ and$ \gamma=-1 $ (i.e.,$ K(\phi)=e^{2\phi} $ and$ V(\phi)=0 $ [42, 43]).We assume that the vector and the dilaton fields depend on the radial coordinate only as shown in Ref. [62], and thus, their radial form can be defined by
$ A_t(r)=\frac{Q}{r}\left[\gamma-\frac{\beta}{2}\left(1+\frac{r^2}{f(r)}\right)\right] , $
(4) $ \phi(r)=-\frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{f(r)}{r^2}\right) . $
(5) Further, the condition
$ U(r)=0 $ with respect to r solves to give the black hole horizon as$ \frac{r_h}{M}= 1-\frac{\gamma Q^2}{2 M^2}+\sqrt{1+\frac{Q^2 (\gamma -\beta )}{M^2}+\frac{\gamma ^2 Q^4}{4 M^4}}\ . $
(6) In Fig. 1, we demonstrate the radial profiles of the radial function
$ U(r) $ for various combinations of the EMS parameters β and γ and also for the black hole charge. As can be observed from Fig. 1, the zeros of the metric function imply the location of black hole horizons. Fig. 1 shows that Cauchy and event horizons become close to each other for large values of β. In addition, the black hole event horizon increases for negative values of γ, whereas it decreases for$ \gamma>0 $ .Figure 1. (color online) Radial dependence of the metric function
$ U(r) $ plotted for the different values of parameters β and γ in the left and right panels, respectively.Let us now examine the characteristics of the extremes in the black hole charge and the minimum in the event horizon radius by setting the following condition:
$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} U(r)=U'(r)=0\, . \end{array} $
(7) The above condition allows one to obtain the radius and charge expressions as follows:
$ \frac{(r_h)_{\rm min}}{M}=2-\frac{\beta }{\gamma }+ \frac{\sqrt{\beta ^2-2 \beta \gamma }}{\gamma }\ , $
(8) $ \frac{Q_{\rm extr}^2}{M^2} =\frac{2 \left(\beta- \sqrt{\beta^2 -2 \beta \gamma }-\gamma \right)}{\gamma ^2}\, . $
(9) In Fig. 2 we show the dependence of the minimum values of the outer horizon and extreme values of the black hole charge from the parameter γ for the different values of β. The solid lines stand for the minimum event horizon, whereas the dashed ones stand for the extreme charge. As can be observed from Fig. 2, the minimum radius of the outer horizon decreases with an increase in the value of γ, and it also decreases with an increase in the value of β at
$ \gamma<0 $ . Similarly, the extreme in Q also decreases at$ \gamma<0 $ . The event horizon becomes zero in the case in which β reaches its critical value, thus implying that β must be less than$ \beta_{cr} $ . The critical value of β increases with the increase in parameter γ.Figure 2. (color online) Critical values of black hole charge (left panel) and minimal radius of the horizon (right panel) as functions of the parameter γ for various combinations of β.
Our numerical analysis shows that for all possible values of parameter γ, the following conditions are always satisfied:
$ \lim\limits_{\beta \to 0} \left\{(r_h)_{\rm min}, Q_{\rm extr}\right\}=\{2M,0\}, $
and
$ \lim\limits_{\beta \to \beta_{\rm max}} \left\{(r_h)_{\rm min}, Q_{\rm extr}\right\}=\{0, Q_{\rm extr}\}. $
The upper value of
$ \beta_{\rm max} $ ($ Q_{\rm extr} $ ) increases (decreases) as parameter γ increases. Together with Eqs. (8) and (9), one can easily find the following relations:$ \beta_{\rm max}=2 \gamma, \qquad \frac{Q_{\rm extr}}{M}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma}}\ . $
(10) In Table 1, we present the critical values of β and corresponding values of
$Q_{\rm extr}$ for the given values of γ.γ $\beta_{\rm max}$ $Q_{\rm extr}/M$ 1/8 $1/4$ $4$ $1/4$ $1/2$ $2\sqrt{2}$ $3/8$ $3/4$ $4/3$ $1/2$ $1$ $2$ $3/4$ $3/2$ $2\sqrt{2}/3$ $1$ $2$ $\sqrt{2}$ Table 1. Extremes of black hole charge and critical value of γ for different values of β when the event horizon is zero.
-
Following the Novikov-Thorne model [64], one can let the accretion disk be optically thick and geometrically thin in the close vicinity of the EMS black hole. However, the accretion disk is really very thin in vertical size because it is extended to the horizontal size. This in turn gives rise to a negligible size in terms of the vertical size in comparison with its long horizontal extension. Therefore, its height h is much smaller than the radius of the disk r extended in the horizontal direction, that is,
$ h \ll r $ . From this property of the thin accretion disk formed in the surrounding environment of the EMS black hole and from the hydrodynamic equilibrium of the thin disk, the vertical entropy and pressure gradients are regarded as negligible in the accreting matter. The heat generated due to the stress and dynamical friction cannot be accumulated in the accretion disk that is efficiently cooled as stated by the thermal radiation on the disk surface. Hence, this leads to the stabilized thin disk, whose inner edge is then located at a stable orbit around the black hole, thus taking the Keplerian motion for the plasma accreting in stable orbits.We now define the bolometric luminosity of the accretion disk that is given by [65, 66]
$ \mathcal{L}_{bol}=\eta \dot{M}c^2\, , $
(11) where
$ \dot{M} $ and η refer to the rate of accretion matter that falls into the black hole and the energy efficiency of the accretion disk, respectively. It is known from an astrophysical point of view that some issues exist in observing the bolometric luminosity, depending on the black hole parameters and its type. It does, therefore, become very important to measure the bolometric luminosity through the theoretical analysis and models. To this end, it is valuable to define the energy efficiency of the accretion disk around black holes, which is the highest energy that can be mined out via the the accretion disk, as that of matter falling into the black hole. Hence, the energy efficiency is increasingly important to explain the nature of the accretion process due to the fact that the rest mass-accreting matter turns into the electromagnetic radiation that goes out from the central object. One can then further determine the energy efficiency that stems from the radiation rate of the photon energy that is emitted from the disk surface [67, 68]. Thus, the efficiency can be determined via the measured energy at the ISCO [69] in the case when the photons emitted from the disk escape to infinity, that is [70]:$ \eta=1-\mathcal{E}_{\rm ISCO}\ . $
(12) The above expression for the measured energy at the ISCO allows one to find the radiative efficiency η for the emitted photon from the disk. Therefore, it is essential to determine the ISCO parameters, that is,
$r_{\rm ISCO}$ ,$\mathcal{E}_{\rm ISCO}$ , and$\mathcal{L}_{\rm ISCO}$ . For that purpose, one needs to consider the test particle dynamics around electrically charged EMS black holes. It is well-known that the standard form of the effective potential for the radial motion of the test particle can generally be defined by [71]$ V_{\rm eff}(r)=-1+\dfrac{\mathcal{E}^2 g_{\phi \phi}+2 \mathcal{E} \mathcal{L} g_{t \phi}+\mathcal{L}^2 g_{tt}}{g^2_{t \phi}-g_{tt}g_{\phi \phi}}\, , $
(13) with the specific energy
$ \mathcal{E}=E/m $ and angular momentum$ \mathcal{L}=L/m $ . Here, we note that the metric functions are given by$ g_{tt}= U(r) $ and$ g_{\phi \phi}=f(r)\sin^2\theta $ with$ g_{t\,\phi}=0 $ for a static and spherically symmetric black hole. These two conserved quantities can be written in terms of metric tensors as follows:$ \mathcal{E}=-\dfrac{g_{tt}}{\sqrt{-g_{tt}-\Omega^2 g_{\phi \phi}}}\, , $
(14) and
$ \mathcal{L}=\dfrac{\Omega g_{\phi \phi}}{\sqrt{-g_{tt}-\Omega^2 g_{\phi \phi}}}\, . $
(15) Similarly, the orbital angular velocity of the test particle is also given by [72−74]
$ \Omega=\dfrac{{\rm d} \phi}{{\rm d} t}=\sqrt{-\dfrac{g_{tt,r}}{g_{\phi \phi,r}}}\ . $
(16) Here, we note that we further restrict motion to the equatorial plane, that is,
$ \theta=\pi/2 $ . According to the model, the accretion disk's inner edge around the black hole can be determined by the ISCO radius that is defined by the following set of conditions for the effective potential:$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} V_{\rm eff}(r)=0, \quad V'_{\rm eff}(r)=0, \quad V''_{\rm eff}(r)=0 .\end{array} $
(17) Let us then turn to the charged particle dynamics around EMS black holes. To that end, we can now define the effective potential for the charged particles moving around the EMS black hole [75],
$ V^{\pm}_{\rm eff}(r)=q A_t \pm \sqrt{U(r)\left(1+\frac{{\cal L}^2}{f(r)\sin^2\theta}\right)}\, . $
(18) The above effective potential has two parts, the column and gravitational interaction parts. Two different solutions exist because the effective potential can behave as symmetry in the following replacements
$ qQ \to -qQ $ :$ V^+_{\rm eff} \to -V^-_{\rm eff} $ and$ V^-_{\rm eff} \to -V^+_{\rm eff} $ . However, we will restrict ourselves to the effective potential$ V^+_{\rm eff} $ that corresponds to the positive energy for physically meaningful timelike motion and for analysing the charged particle's dynamics. Taking$ V^+_{\rm eff} $ into consideration, we can further find the ISCO values of the charged particle, that is,$r_{\rm ISCO}$ ,$\mathcal{E}_{\rm ISCO}$ , and$\mathcal{L}_{\rm ISCO}$ . It is worth noting that we decided to explore the ISCO values numerically. The results are presented in Table 2. As can be observed from the results on the ISCO radius determining the inner edge of the accretion disk, it decreases as a consequence of an increase in the value of the dimensionless parameter β, whereas it increases under the effect of parameter γ. Taking all together, we then analyse the energy efficiency of the accretion disk around the black hole in EMS theory. The value of the energy efficiency is presented in Table 2. As can be observed from the results, the radiative efficiency increases with an increase in the value of parameter β, whereas it decreases as a consequence of the impact of parameter γ. Note that the Schwarzschild black hole case can be obtained in the limit of$ \beta=0 $ and$ \gamma=0 $ . At this point, the efficiency is equal to$ \eta \approx 5.7 $ % [76]. Similarly, the following limit,$ \beta=1 $ and$ \gamma=0 $ , refers to the RN black hole case. The radiative efficiency is then evaluated to be$ \eta \approx 7.5 $ % in the RN black hole case.β $ \gamma=-1 $ $ \gamma=0 $ $ \gamma=1 $ $r_{\rm ISCO}$ η(%) $r_{\rm ISCO}$ η(%) $r_{\rm ISCO}$ η(%) 0.0 5.76641 7.50318 6.0 5.7191 6.2865 4.0603 0.5 5.61325 8.41598 5.82216 6.58717 6.05386 4.89047 1.0 5.46477 9.35293 5.65896 7.47554 5.85509 5.74132 2.0 5.16738 11.3155 5.35546 9.31973 5.51641 7.50318 Table 2. Value of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) radius and radiative efficiency of the accretion disk tabulated for the different values of parameter β in the possible cases of parameter γ. Note that we have set
$ q=0.5 $ and$ Q=0.5 $ . -
In this section, we study the flux produced by an accretion disk of the EMS black hole. We note that an accretion disk consists of gas and dust moving on stable orbits of a black hole or neutron star. The gas and dust can lose their energy and angular momentum owing to the background geometry when they start moving around the compact object. As a result, the orbits of gas and dust move to the inner edge of the accretion disc so that they fall towards the compact object. This process ends up with accretion disk radiation, in which the gas and dust can heat up and emit radiation. We further expect that the accretion disk radiation can be affected by the EMS black hole parameters. In particular, the black hole charge can affect the gas and dust in the accretion disk around the black hole, thus resulting in highly ionized gas and dust in the accretion disk around the black hole. As a consequence of the ionization process, the high energy radiation can be emitted in the form of X-rays that can be detected. The radiation of the accretion disk around a black hole in the EMS theory is expected to be a potent test to explain valuable and remarkable aspects of the accretion disk and can also lead to serious implications from the observational point of view. The flux of the electromagnetic radiation can be defined by the following equation [67, 77, 78]:
$ \mathcal{F}(r)=-\dfrac{\dot{M_0}}{4 \pi \sqrt{g}}\dfrac{\Omega_{,r}}{(E-\Omega L)^2} \int _{r_{\rm ISCO}}^r (E-\Omega L) L_{,r} {\rm d} r\, , $
(19) with the determinant of the three-dimensional subspace
$ g=\sqrt{-g_{tt}g_{rr}g_{\phi \phi}} $ with ($ t, r, \phi $ ) coordinates. In the above equation, the quantity$ \mathcal{F}(r) $ can be defined as the function of$ \dot{M_0} $ that can be regarded as unknown and corresponds to the accretion rate of the disk mass. However, we can set$ \dot{M_0}=1 $ for further analysis.Using Eqs. (14) and (15) we further derive the flux of the electromagnetic radiation. It does however turn out that it is complicated to derive the analytical expression of the flux, and thus, we resort to it numerically, as shown in Fig. 3. As can be observed from Fig. 3, the shape of the flux of the electromagnetic radiation increases/decreases under the effect of the γ parameter as compared with the RN case, depending on its sign. However, it increases as a consequence of an increase in the value of black hole charge Q and parameter β. In the top-left panel of Fig. 3, we show the flux of the electromagnetic radiation for the Schwarzschild and RN black hole cases. From Fig. 3, it can be easily observed that the black hole charge increases the value of the flux of the electromagnetic radiation. In addition, the flux of the black body radiation can be written as
$ \mathcal{F}(r)=\sigma T^4 $ with σ as the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The radial dependence of the disk temperature and energy is further shown in Fig. 4 for various values of black hole charge. In this graph, we select$ \beta=0 $ &$ \gamma=0 $ and$ \beta=1 $ &$ \gamma=0 $ for the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes, respectively. As can be observed from Fig. 4, the temperature and energy of the accretion disk around the EMS black hole increase with increasing black hole charge Q.Figure 3. (color online) Radial dependence of the flux of electromagnetic radiation of the accretion disk on different values of Q, β, and γ, plotted for the black hole in EMS theory. Numerical evaluation of the flux
$ \mathcal{F} $ divided by$ 10^{-5} $ of the accretion disk as a function of$ r/M $ .Figure 4. (color online) Radial dependence of the temperature and energy of the accretion disk plotted in the left and right panels, respectively, for different values of black hole charge Q in the case of fixed
$ \gamma=0 $ and$ \beta=1 $ .To be more informative, we plot the temperature through the "color map" in Fig. 5. From Fig. 5, it can be clearly observed that the dark region lies inside the accretion disk's inner edge, whereas the red parts refer to the regions where the temperature of the disk can reach its maximum value.
Figure 5. (color online) Left panel: temperature profile of the radial dependence of black hole charge. Right panel: temperature profile on the equatorial
$ X-Y $ plane in the form of density plot. Here, the Cartesian coordinates are defined by X and Y.We then turn to another important quantity referred to as the differential luminosity. It can be expressed as follows [67, 77, 78]:
$ \dfrac{{\rm d} \mathcal{L}_{\infty}}{{\rm d} \ln{r}}=4 \pi r \sqrt{g} E \mathcal{F}(r)\, .$
(20) We assume that the radiation emission can be described by black body radiation. Keeping this in mind, one can then define the spectral luminosity
$ \mathcal{L}_{\nu,\infty} $ as a function of the radiation frequency ν at infinity [69, 79, 80] as follows:$ \nu \mathcal{L}_{\nu,\infty}=\dfrac{60}{\pi^3} \int_{r_{\rm ISCO}}^{\infty} \dfrac{\sqrt{g} E}{M_T^2}\dfrac{(u^t y)^4}{\exp\Big[{\dfrac{u^t y}{(M_T^2 \mathcal{F})^{1/4}}}\Big]-1}\, , $
(21) with
$ y=h \nu /k T_{\star} $ , where h and k respectively refer to the Planck constant and constant of Boltzmann, as well as the total mass$ M_T $ . In addition,$ T_{\star} $ corresponds to the characteristic temperature and has a relation with the Stefan-Boltzmann law, that is,$ \sigma T_{\star}= \dfrac{\dot{M}_0}{4 \pi M_T^2} $ , where σ accordingly refers to the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Another important quantity is the differential luminosity. The radial dependence of the differential luminosity is represented in Fig. 6. The electromagnetic radiation flux of the accretion disk can be scaled in powers of$ 10^{-5} $ . The differential luminosity of the accretion disk depends on the flux by the relation given in Eq. (20). Therefore the value of the differential luminosity can be of the order of$ 10^{-2} $ . As can be observed, the value of the differential luminosity increases as a consequence of an increase in the value of black hole charge Q.
Radiation properties of the accretion disk around a black hole in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory
- Received Date: 2023-10-11
- Available Online: 2024-02-15
Abstract: In this study, we explore the properties of a non-rotating black hole in the Einstein-Maxwell-scalar (EMS) theory and investigate the luminosity of the accretion disk surrounding it. We determine all the orbital parameters of particles in the accretion disk, including the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) with angular velocity, angular momentum, and energy. Further, we study the radiative efficiency for different values of black hole parameters. Finally, we analyze the flux, differential luminosity, and temperature of the accretion disk.