Comparison between calculations of CDCC and spherical optical model with deuteron as projectile

AN Hai-Xia; CAI Chong-Hai

近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。

本刊再次郑重声明：

（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137

（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。

（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。

《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部

2024年10月30日

Chinese Physics C> 2008, Vol. 32> Issue(S2) : 99-101

Comparison between calculations of CDCC and spherical optical model with deuteron as projectile

AN Hai-Xia ^, ,
CAI Chong-Hai

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
With the CDCC approach, the reactions induced by weakly bound nucleus deuteron are studied. By comparing the results from CDCC approach and spherical optical model with our global deuteron optical potential, we find that it is reasonable and valuable for CDCC approach in a large energy range and nuclei range.

References

[1]

. Austern N, Iseri Y, Kamimura M et al. Phys. Rep., 1987,154: 1252. Piyadasa R A D, Kawai M, Kamimura M et al. Phys. Rev.C, 1999, 60: 0446113. Yahiro M, Nakano M, Iseri Y et al. Prog. Theor. Phys.,1982, 67: 14674. Piyadasa R A D, Yahiro M, Kamimura M et al. Prog.Theor. Phys., 1989, 81: 9105. AN Hai-Xia, CAI Chong-Hai. Phys. Rev. C, 2006, 73:0546056. Koning A J, Delaroche J P. Nucl. Phys. A, 2003, 713: 3,2317. Kiss A et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1976, 262: 18. Childs J D, Daehnick W W, Spisak M J. Phys. Rev. C,1974, 10: 2179. Hatanaka K et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1980, 340(1): 9310. Baumer C et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 63: 03760111. Kor A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 06760112. Okamura H et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 58(4): 2180

[1]	Bao-dong Sun , Yu-bing Dong . Deuteron electromagnetic form factors with the light-front approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(1): 013102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/013102
[2]	Rui-Ju Guo , Zhi-Quan Li , Chen Liu , Yong-He Tian , Shou-Yu Wang . Shell-model calculations for the semi-magic nucleus ⁸⁵Br and systematic features of the N=50 odd-A isotones. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(8): 084105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/084105
[3]	Yu. A. Berezhnoy , V. P. Mikhailyuk . Polarization of protons in the optical model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 024102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/024102
[4]	A. Gómez Camacho , J. Lubian , H. Q. Zhang , Shan-Gui Zhou . CDCC calculations of fusion of ⁶Li with targets ¹⁴⁴Sm and ¹⁵⁴Sm:effect of resonance states. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(12): 124103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124103
[5]	Lei Yang , Cheng-Jian Lin , Hui-Ming Jia , Xin-Xing Xu , Nan-Ru Ma , Li-Jie Sun , Feng Yang , Huan-Qiao Zhang , Zu-Hua Liu , Dong-Xi Wang . Test of the notch technique for determining the radial sensitivity of the optical model potential. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 056201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/056201
[6]	Awad A. Ibraheem . Folding model calculations for ⁶He+¹²C elastic scattering. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(3): 034102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/034102
[7]	MA Zhong-Qi , YAN Zong-Chao . Rotational invariants constructed by the products of three spherical harmonic polynomials. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 063104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/063104
[8]	LIANG Cui-Ying , DONG Yu-Bing . Deuteron form factors in a phenomenological approach. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(10): 104104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/10/104104
[9]	LIU Lang . Ab initio Monte Carlo shell model calculations for ⁷Li and ⁹Li low-lying spectra. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 064101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/064101
[10]	LIU Lang . No-core Monte Carlo shell model calculations with unitary correlation operator method and similarity renormalization group. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 054103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/054103
[11]	H. Hassanabadi , A. A. Rajabi , H. Rahimov , S. Zarrinkamar . Half-life of bismuth isotopes predicted by the Coulomb and proximity potential model; a proposition for the spherical nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(10): 964-966. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/008
[12]	WANG Han-Kui , GAO Zao-Chun , CHEN Yong-Shou , GUO Jian-You , CHEN Yong-Jing , TU Ya . The structure of the spherical tensor forces in the USD and GXPF1A shell model Hamiltonians. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(8): 753-757. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/8/010
[13]	DONG Yu-Bing . An estimate of two-photon exchange effect on deuteron electromagnetic form factors. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1346-1349. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/039
[14]	YAO Jian , JI Xiao-Bin , LI De-Min . Histogram comparison used in BESⅢ software and data validation. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(3): 374-378. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/3/013
[15]	FAN Guang-Wei , XU Wang , PAN Qiang-Yan , CAI Xiao-Lu , FAN Gong-Tao , LI Yong-Jiang , LUO Wen , XU Ben-Ji , YAN Zhe , YANG Li-Feng . Radius studies of ⁸Li and ⁸B using the optical-limit Glauber model in conjunction with relativistic mean-field theory. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(10): 1622-1627. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/013
[16]	I. Jaeglé (for the CBELSA/TAPS collaboration) . Photoproduction of mesons off the deuteron: quasifree and coherent processes. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1340-1344. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/050
[17]	ZHAO Xiao-Song , LV Jian-Qin . Comparison of the PIC model and the Lie algebraic method in the simulation of intense continuous beam transport. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S2): 125-127. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/032
[18]	LI Xiao-Hua , LIANG Chun-Tian , CAI Chong-Hai . Comparison between global phenomenological and microscopic optical potentials for proton as projectile below 100 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(6): 415-422. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/6/003
[19]	<SPAN lang=EN-US style= . Isospin effect of projectile fragment yields. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 89-92.
[20]	LU Cong-Shan , ZHANG Jing-Shang , SHEN Qing-Biao . The Deuteron Microscopic Optical Potential. Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(10): 919-927.

Access

Get Citation

AN Hai-Xia and CAI Chong-Hai. Comparison between calculations of CDCC and spherical optical model with deuteron as projectile[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 99-101.

AN Hai-Xia and CAI Chong-Hai. Comparison between calculations of CDCC and spherical optical model with deuteron as projectile[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 99-101. shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2008-07-17
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(3203)
PDF Downloads(593)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Comparison between calculations of CDCC and spherical optical model with deuteron as projectile

AN Hai-Xia ^,
CAI Chong-Hai

Corresponding author: AN Hai-Xia,

Received Date: 2008-07-17
Accepted Date: 1900-01-01
Available Online: 2008-01-03

Abstract: With the CDCC approach, the reactions induced by weakly bound nucleus deuteron are studied. By comparing the results from CDCC approach and spherical optical model with our global deuteron optical potential, we find that it is reasonable and valuable for CDCC approach in a large energy range and nuclei range.