Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods inbeam halo experiments

JIANG Hong-Ping; FU Shi-Nian; PENG Jun; CHENG Peng; HUANG Tao; LI Peng; LI Fang; LI Jian; LIU Hua-Chang; LIU Mei-Fei; MENG Ming; MENG Cai; MU Zhen-Cheng; RONG Lin-Yan; OUYANG Hua-Fu; SUN Biao; WANG Bo; TIAN Jian-Min; WANG Biao; WANG Sheng-Chang; YAO Yuan; XU Tao-Guang; XU Xin-An; XIN Wen-Qu; ZHAO Fu-Xiang; ZENG Lei; ZHOU Wen-Zhong

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/087002

Chinese Physics C> 2014, Vol. 38> Issue(8) : 087002 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/087002

Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods inbeam halo experiments

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments.

References

[1]

JIANG H, FU S, CHEN P et al. Macroparticle Simulation Studies of a Beam-Core Matching Experiment. Proceedings of the 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference. Shanghai, China, 2013. 3860-3860[2] RUAN Yu-Fang, HAN Lu-Xiang, LIU Hua-Chang et al. Chinese Physics C (HEP NP), 2010, 34(10): 1655[3] PENG Jun, HUANG Tao, LIU Hua-Chang et al. Chinese Physics C (HEP NP), 2013, 37(3): 037002[4] Schulze M E, Allen C K, Colestock P L et al. Characterization of the Proton Beam from the 6.7 MeV LEDA RFQ. Particle Accelerator Conference, 2001. PAC 2001. Proceedings of the 2001. IEEE, 2001, 1: 591-593[5] QIANG J, Ryne R, Habib S et al. An Object-Oriented Parallel Particle-in-Cell Code for Beam Dynamics Simulation in Linear Accelerators. Supercomputing, ACM/IEEE 1999 Conference. IEEE, 1999. 55-55[6] Ross M C, Seeman J T, Bong E et al. Wire Scanners for Beam Size and Emittance Measurements at the SLC. IEEE Particle Accelerator Conf., San Francisco, CA. 1991[7] Crandall K R et al. RFQ Design Codes. Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-UR-96-1835 (revised February 12, 1997)[8] Reiser M. Theory and Design of Charged Particle Beams. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2008[9] Lysenko W P, Gilpatrick J D, Rybarcyk L J et al. Determining Phase-Space Properties of the LEDA RFQ Output Beam. arXiv preprint physics/0008186, 2000[10] Wangler T P, Allen C K, Chan K C D et al. Experimental Study of Proton-Beam Halo Induced by Beam Mismatch in LEDA. Particle Accelerator Conference, 2001. PAC 2001. Proceedings of the 2001. IEEE, 2001, 4: 2923-2925

[1]	Zheng Gao , Yuan He , Xian-Wu Wang , Wei Chang , Rui-Feng Zhang , Zheng-Long Zhu , Sheng-Hu Zhang , Qi Chen , Tom Powers . Study on transient beam loading compensation for China ADS proton linac injector Ⅱ. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 057005. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/057005
[2]	Yong Zhang , Jun-Xia Wu , Guang-Yu Zhu , Huan Jia , Zong-Heng Xue , Hai Zheng , Hong-Ming Xie , Xin-Cai Kang , Yuan He , Lin Li , Jean Claude Denard . Capacitive beam position monitors for the low-β beam of the Chinese ADS proton linac. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(2): 027003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/2/027003
[3]	XIE Hong-Ming , WU Jun-Xia , ZHANG Yong , ZHU Guang-Yu , XIA Jia-Wen , YE Min-You . Beam experiments with a non-intercepting beam induced fluorescence profile monitor for the ADS LINAC. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 117004. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/117004
[4]	LI Zhi-Hui , TANG Jing-Yu . A CW superconducting linac as the proton driver for a medium baseline neutrino beam in China. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(12): 127001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/12/127001
[5]	WANG Dou , Philip Bambade , Kaoru Yokoya , GAO Jie . Analytical estimation of ATF beam halo distribution. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(12): 127003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/12/127003
[6]	WANG Xiang-Qi , LUO Huan-Li , HAO Hao , TANG Jing-Yu , LI Wei-Min , XU Hong-Liang . Design of proton beam optics to realize beam distribution transformation in C-ADS HTBT. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(2): 027004. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/2/027004
[7]	WANG Hai-Jing , LIU Wei-Bin , QU Hua-Min , ZHU Dong-Hui , HUANG Nan , KANG Ling , LIU Ren-Hong . Thermal analysis and optimization of proton beam window for the CSNS. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(7): 077001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/7/077001
[8]	BAI Sha , GAO Jie . Propagation of a beam halo in accelerator test facility 2 at KEK. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(5): 057005. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/5/057005
[9]	CAO Dong-Liang , REN Zhong-Zhou , DONG Tie-Kuang . A theoretical study of halo structure using elastic proton-nucleus scattering. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(3): 034103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/034103
[10]	PENG Jun , HUANG Tao , LIU Hua-Chang , JIANG Hong-Ping , LI Peng , LI Fang , LI Jian , LIU Mei-Fei , MU Zhen-Cheng , MENG Cai , MENG Ming , OUYANG Hua-Fu , RONG Lin-Yan , TIAN Jian-Min , WANG Biao , WANG Bo , XU Tao-Guang , XU Xin-An , YAO Yuan , XIN Wen-Qu , ZHAO Fu-Xiang , ZENG Lei , ZHOU Wen-Zhong . Beam halo experiment at IHEP. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(3): 037002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/037002
[11]	M. Y&#0 , maz . DTL cavity design and beam dynamics for a TAC linear proton accelerator. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(2): 167-172. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/2/012
[12]	LI Xiang , ZHENG Shu-Xin . Design and experiments for the waveguide to coaxial cable adapter of a cavity beam position monitor. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(1): 79-82. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/1/016
[13]	JIN Jing , CHEN Yong , ZHANG Shuang-Nan , ZHANG Shu , LI Xin-Qiao , LI Gang . A study of the pointed observation methods and sensitivity of HXMT. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(1): 66-71. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/1/012
[14]	SHU Hang , FANG Shou-Xian , GUAN Xia-Ling , TANG Jing-Yu , LIU De-Kang , FU Shi-Nian , LI Gang , LIU Li , CHEN Yuan , JIAO Yi , QIU Jing . Irradiation methods and nozzle design for the advanced proton therapy facility. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(4): 516-520. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/4/020
[15]	LI Xiang , ZHENG Shu-Xin . Simulation and experiments for the Q_ext of a cavity beam position monitor. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(3): 405-408. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/3/020
[16]	DU Jia-Xin , KE Hong-Wei , XU Ming-Mei , LIU Lian-Shou . Characterizing variable for the critical point in momentum space. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(8): 655-660. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/8/011
[17]	RUAN Yu-Fang , XU Tao-Guang , FU Shi-Nian . Design and simulation of a beam position monitor for the high current proton linac. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(3): 240-244. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/015
[18]	LIU Bi-Cheng , YAN Xue-Qing , LIN Chen , LU Yuan-Rong , GUO Zhi-Yu , FANG Jia-Xun , SHENG Zheng-Ming , LI Yu-Tong , CHEN Jia-Er . Generating monoenergetic proton beam by using circularly polarized laser. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S2): 168-170. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/044
[19]	Guo Yingxiang , Sun Xiangfu , Luo Ybdao , Lei Xiangguo , Sun Xijun , Xu Xiaoji , Zhao Zhizheng , Wang Jicheng , Yu Jianfang , Wen Shuxian , Li Shenggang , Weng Peikun , Hua Pengfei , Li Guangsheng , Yuan Guanjun , Zhu Lihua , Zhang Lankuan , Yu Panshui , Yan Chunxiang . Experiments with Joined in-beam γ Equipment. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(S4): 391-397.
[20]	Luo Zihua , Wang Shuhong . Computational Research on Beam Transverse Motion for 35 Mev Beijing Proton Linac. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(S3): 229-236.

Access

Get Citation

JIANG Hong-Ping, FU Shi-Nian, PENG Jun, CHENG Peng, HUANG Tao, LI Peng, LI Fang, LI Jian, LIU Hua-Chang, LIU Mei-Fei, MENG Ming, MENG Cai, MU Zhen-Cheng, RONG Lin-Yan, OUYANG Hua-Fu, SUN Biao, WANG Bo, TIAN Jian-Min, WANG Biao, WANG Sheng-Chang, YAO Yuan, XU Tao-Guang, XU Xin-An, XIN Wen-Qu, ZHAO Fu-Xiang, ZENG Lei and ZHOU Wen-Zhong. Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods inbeam halo experiments[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(8): 087002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/087002

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2013-10-15
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(2144)
PDF Downloads(228)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods inbeam halo experiments

Corresponding author: JIANG Hong-Ping,

Received Date: 2013-10-15

Accepted Date: 1900-01-01

Available Online: 2014-08-05

Abstract: In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments.

HTML

Reference (1)

Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods inbeam halo experiments

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article