Investigation of fission fragments average spin based on four dimensional Langevin dynamical model

  • We applied the four dimensional Langevin dynamical model to investigate the average spin of fission fragments. Elongation, neck thickness, asymmetry parameter, and the orientation degree of freedom (K coordinate) are the four dimensions of the dynamical model. We assume that the collective modes depend on the emission angle of the fragments, then different parameters related to the average spin of fission fragments are calculated dynamically. The angle dependence of average spin of fission fragments is investigated by calculating the spin at angles 90° and 165°. Also, the obtained results based on the transition state model at scission point are presented. One can obtain better agreement between the results of the dynamical model and experimental data in comparison with the results of the transition state model.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] J. R. Nix and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A, 71:1(1965)
    [2] B. B. Back et al., Phys. Rev. C, 41:1495(1990)
    [3] D. V. Shetty, R. K. Choudhury, B. K. Nayak, D. M. Nadkarni, and S. S. Kapoor, Phys. Rev. C, 58:R616(1998)
    [4] L. G. Moretto and R. P. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. C, 21:204(1980)
    [5] R. P. Schmitt and A. J. Pachaeo, Nucl. Phys. A, 379:313(1982)
    [6] D. V. Shetty, R. K. Choudhury, B. K. Nayak, D. M. Nadkarni, and S. S. Kapoor, Phys. Rev. C, 56:868(1997)
    [7] W. D. Myers, Droplet model of atomic nuclei, IFI/plenum dataco., New York, (1977)
    [8] A. J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C, 33:2039(1986)
    [9] BARMOM, 9677, National Energy Software Centre, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
    [10] R. K. Choudhury, Para. J. Phys., 57:2(2001)
    [11] T. Wada, Y. Abe and N. Carjan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:3538(1993)
    [12] W. Ye, Phys. Rev. C, 81:054609(2010)
    [13] K. Pomorski, J. Bartel, J. Richert, and K. Dietrich, Nucl. Phys. A, 605:87(1996)
    [14] P. N. Nadtochy, G. D. Adeev, and A. V. Karpov, Phys. Rev. C, 65:064615(2002)
    [15] A. V. Karpov, R. M. Hiryanov, A. V. Sagdeev and G. D. Adeev, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 34:255(2007)
    [16] M. R. Pahlavani, D. Naderi, and S. M. Mirfathi, Int. Mod. Phys. E, 19:1451(2010)
    [17] W. Ye, Phys. Rev. C, 83:044611(2011)
    [18] R. P. Schmitt, G. Mouchaty, and D. R. Haenni, Nucl. Phys. A, 427:614(1984)
    [19] I. Ahmad and W. R. Phillips, Rep. Prog. Phys., 58:1415(1995)
    [20] A. Ya. Rusanov, G. D. Adeev, M. G. Itkis, A. V. Karpov, P. N. Nadtochy, V. V. Pashkevich, I. V. Pokrovsky, V. S. Salamatin, and G. G. Chubarian, Phys. At. Nucl., 70:1679(2007)
    [21] R. P. Schmitt and M. Tirion, Phys. Rev. C, 31:701(1985)
    [22] R. P. Schmitt, L. Cooke, H. Dejbakhsh, D. R. Haenni, T. Shutt, B. K. Srivastava and H. Utsunomiya, Nucl. Phys. A, 592:130(1995)
    [23] R. P. Schmitt, D. R. Haenni, L. Cooke, H. Dejbakhsh, G. Mouchaty, T. Shutt and H. Utsunomiya, Nucl. Phys. A, 487:370(1988)
    [24] A. K. Dhara, K. Krishan, C. Bhattacharya, and S. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. C, 57; 2453(1998)
    [25] Y. Jia and J. D. Bao, Phys. Rev. C, 75:034601(2007)
    [26] D. Naderi, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 40:125103(2013)
    [27] H. Feldmeier,Rep. Prog. Phys., 50:915(1987)
    [28] A. V. Karpov, P. N. Nadtochy, D. V. Vanin and G. D. Adeev, Phys. Rev. C, 63:054610(2001); D. Naderi, Phys. Rev. C, 86:044609(2012)
    [29] A. V. Ignatyuk, M. G. Itkis, V. N. Okolovich, G. N. Smirenkin and A. S. Tishin, Phys. Yad. Fiz., 21:1185(1975)
    [30] Y. Aritomo and S. Chiba, Phys. Rev. C, 88:044614(2013)
    [31] K. T. R. Davies and J. R. Nix, Phys. Rev. C, 14; 1977(1976)
    [32] R. M. Hiryanov, A. V. Karpov, and G. D. Adeev, Phys. At. Nucl., 71:1361(2008)
    [33] P. N. Nadtochy, E. G. Ryabov, A. E. Gegechkori, Yu. A. Anischenko, and G. D. Adeev,Phys. Rev. C, 85:064619(2012)
    [34] J. P. Lestone and S. G. McCalla, Phys. Rev. C, 79:044611(2009)
    [35] D. O. Eremenko, V. A. Drozdov, M. H. Eslamizadex, O. V. Fotina, S. Y. Platonov, and O. A. Yuminov,Phys. At. Nucl., 69:1423(2006)
    [36] V. A. Drozdov, D. O. Eremenko, O. V. Fotina, S. Y. Platonov, and O. A. Yuminov, inTours Symposium on Nuclear Physics V, Tours, 2003, AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 704, edited by M. Arnold, M. Lewitowicz, G. Munzenberg, H. Akimune, M. Ohta, H. Utsunomiya, T. Wada, and T. Yamagata (AIP, Melville, New York, 2004), pp. 13038
    [37] P. N. Nadtochy et al., Phys. Rev. C, 89:01616(2014)
    [38] P. Frbrich, I. I. Gontchar, Phys. Rep., 292:131(1998)
    [39] J. E. Lynn, The theory of neutron resonance reactions (Clarendon, Oxford, 1968) p. 325
    [40] V. G. Nedoresov, Yu. N. Ranyuk, Fotodelenie yader za gigantskim rezonansom (Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 1989)(in Russian)
    [41] D. Naderi, Phys. Rev. C, 90:024614(2014)
  • 加载中

Get Citation
D. Naderi and M. Salimi. Investigation of fission fragments average spin based on four dimensional Langevin dynamical model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 024104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/024104
D. Naderi and M. Salimi. Investigation of fission fragments average spin based on four dimensional Langevin dynamical model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 024104.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/024104 shu
Milestone
Received: 2016-09-09
Article Metric

Article Views(1418)
PDF Downloads(43)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Investigation of fission fragments average spin based on four dimensional Langevin dynamical model

    Corresponding author: D. Naderi, d.naderi@razi.ac.ir
    Corresponding author: M. Salimi, d.naderi@razi.ac.ir
  • 1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Razi University, P. O. Box 67149, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract: We applied the four dimensional Langevin dynamical model to investigate the average spin of fission fragments. Elongation, neck thickness, asymmetry parameter, and the orientation degree of freedom (K coordinate) are the four dimensions of the dynamical model. We assume that the collective modes depend on the emission angle of the fragments, then different parameters related to the average spin of fission fragments are calculated dynamically. The angle dependence of average spin of fission fragments is investigated by calculating the spin at angles 90° and 165°. Also, the obtained results based on the transition state model at scission point are presented. One can obtain better agreement between the results of the dynamical model and experimental data in comparison with the results of the transition state model.

    HTML

Reference (41)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return