Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of &nu;&mu; off 12C

Deepika Grover; Kapil Saraswat; Prashant Shukla; Venktesh Singh

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/123104

Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(12) : 123104 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/123104

Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of ν_μ off ¹²C

1.
Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
2.
Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
3.
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094, India

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
In this work, we study charged current quasi-elastic scattering (QES) of ν_μ off nucleon and nucleus using a formalism based on the Llewellyn Smith (LS) model. Parameterizations by Galster et al. are used for electric and magnetic Sach's form factors of the nucleons. We use the Fermi gas model along with the Pauli suppression condition to take into account the nuclear effects in the anti-neutrino—nucleus QES. We calculate ν_μ - p and ν_μ -¹²C charged current quasi-elastic scattering differential and total cross sections for different values of axial mass M_A, and compare the results with data from the GGM, SKAT, BNL, NOMAD, MINERνA and MiniBooNE experiments. The present theoretical approach gives a good description of differential cross section data. The calculations with axial mass M_A=0.979 and 1.05 GeV are compatible with data from most of the experiments.
- cross section ,
- quasi-elastic scattering ,
- axial mass ,
- form factors

References

[1]	M. H. Ahn et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:041801(2003)
[2]	E. Aliu et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:081802(2005)
[3]	M. H. Ahn et al (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 74:072003(2006)
[4]	Y. Ashie et al (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 71:112005(2005)
[5]	Y. Takeuchi (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Supl., 79:229- 232(2012)
[6]	P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(15):151806(2016)
[7]	P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 93(5):051104(2016)
[8]	P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(15):151802(2017)
[9]	P. Adamson et al (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(23):231801(2017)
[10]	S. Ahmed et al (ICAL Collaboration), Pramana, 88(5):79(2017)
[11]	J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84:1307(2012)
[12]	S. Bonetti, G. Carnesecchi, D. Cavalli, P. Negri, A. Pullia, M. Rollier, F. Romano, and R. Schira, Nuovo Cim. A, 38:260(1977)
[13]	N. Armenise et al, Nucl. Phys. B, 152:365(1979)
[14]	J. Brunner et al (SKAT Collaboration), Z. Phys. C, 45:551(1990)
[15]	G. Fanourakis et al, Phys. Rev. D, 21:562(1980)
[16]	V. Lyubushkin et al (NOMAD Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 63:355(2009)
[17]	L. Fields et al (MINERvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(2):022501(2013)
[18]	A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 88(3):032001(2013)
[19]	K. S. Kuzmin, V. V. Lyubushkin, and V. A. Naumov, Eur. Phys. J. C, 54:517(2008)
[20]	C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rept., 3:261(1972)
[21]	S. Galster, H. Klein, J. Moritz, K. H. Schmidt, D. Wegener, and J. Bleckwenn, Nucl. Phys. B, 32:221(1971)
[22]	R. A. Smith and E. J. Moniz, Nucl. Phys. B, 43:605(1972) Erratum:[Nucl. Phys. B, 101:547(1975)]
[23]	Amin A. Leghrouz, M. A. Abu-Samreh, and A. M. Saleh, J. Al-Aqsa Unv., 10(S.E.), (2006)
[24]	K. Saraswat, P. Shukla, V. Kumar, and V. Singh, Indian J. Phys., 92(2):249(2018)
[25]	L. Alvarez-Ruso, Y. Hayato, and J. Nieves, New J. Phys., 16:075015(2014)
[26]	R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D, 88(11):113007(2013)
[27]	M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C, 80:065501(2009)
[28]	M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C, 81:045502(2010)
[29]	M. Martini, M. Ericson, and G. Chanfray, Phys. Rev. C, 84:055502(2011)
[30]	P. Stoler, Phys. Rept., 226:103(1993)
[31]	V. Bernard, L. Elouadrhiri, and U. G. Meissner, J. Phys. G, 28:R1(2002)
[32]	H. S. Budd, A. Bodek, and J. Arrington, hep-ex/0308005
[33]	H. S. Budd, A. Bodek, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 139:90(2005)
[34]	R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 159:127(2006)
[35]	P. E. Bosted, Phys. Rev. C, 51:409(1995)
[36]	W. M. Alberico, S. M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, and K. M. Graczyk, Phys. Rev. C, 79:065204(2009)
[37]	A. F. Krutov and V. E. Troitsky, Eur. Phys. J. A, 16:285(2003)
[38]	E. J. Moniz, I. Sick, R. R. Whitney, J. R. Ficenec, R. D. Kephart, and W. P. Trower, Phys. Rev. Lett., 26:445(1971)
[39]	L. D. Kolupaeva, K. S. Kuzmin, O. N. Petrova, and I. M. Shandrov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 31(12):1650077(2016)

[1]	C. Aydın . Role of neutrino form factors in the energy loss rates of the pair annihilation process. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(7): 073107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac62ca
[2]	Liang-Liang Liu , Chao Wang , Xin-Heng Guo . Electromagnetic form factors of Λ_c in the space-like momentum region. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 103106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/103106
[3]	Jian-Jun He , Ivano Lombardo , Daniele Dell'Aquila , Yi Xu , Li-Yong Zhang , Wei-Ping Liu . Thermonuclear ¹⁹F(p,α₀)¹⁶O reaction rate. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(1): 015001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/1/015001
[4]	M. Ablikim , et al . Measurement of the integrated Luminosities of cross-section scan data samples around the ψ(3770) mass region. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(6): 063001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/063001
[5]	Bao-dong Sun , Yu-bing Dong . Deuteron electromagnetic form factors with the light-front approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(1): 013102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/013102
[6]	Chang-Lin Lan , Yi Zhang , Tao Lv , Bao-Lin Xie , Meng Peng , Ze-En Yao , Jin-Gen Chen , Xiang-Zhong Kong . Determination of neutron capture cross sections of ²³²Th at 14.1 MeV and 14.8 MeV using the neutron activation method. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(4): 044002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044002
[7]	Rajnikant Makwana , S. Mukherjee , Jian-Song Wang , Zhi-Qiang Chen . New empirical formula for (γ, n) reaction cross section near GDR peak for elements with Z≥60. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(4): 044105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044105
[8]	Fangcheng He , Ping Wang . Dirac and Pauli form factors of nucleons using nonlocal chiral effective Lagrangian. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(11): 114106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/11/114106
[9]	Zhen-Xing Chen , Ying Yang , Man-Qi Ruan , Da-Yong Wang , Gang Li , Shan Jin , Yong Ban . Cross section and Higgs mass measurement with Higgsstrahlung at the CEPC. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 023003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/023003
[10]	Xin Mo , Gang Li , Man-Qi Ruan , Xin-Chou Lou . Physics cross sections and event generation of e⁺e^- annihilations at the CEPC. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/033001
[11]	WU Qing , ZHOU Li-Juan , XIANG Qian-Fei , MA Wei-Xing . Multiquark cluster form factors in the relativistic harmonic oscillator model. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(1): 013102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/1/013102
[12]	LIANG Cui-Ying , DONG Yu-Bing . Deuteron form factors in a phenomenological approach. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(10): 104104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/10/104104
[13]	JIN Dan , YANG Ya-Dong . Space- and time-like kaon electromagnetic form factors in perturbative QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(10): 941-946. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/004
[14]	WANG Bo-Qun , MO Xiao-Hu , WANG Ping , BAN Yong . Fast computation of observed cross section for ψ'→PP decays. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(5): 411-418. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/5/001
[15]	DONG Yu-Bing . An estimate of two-photon exchange effect on deuteron electromagnetic form factors. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1346-1349. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/039
[16]	S. Pacetti¹ , 2 . Nucleon form factors: the space-time connection. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 874-876.
[17]	A. J. Buchmann . Excited nucleon electromagnetic form factors from broken spin-flavor symmetry. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1257-1260. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/034
[18]	R. W. Gothe . Nucleon transition form factors at JLab: status and outlook. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1216-1221. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/026
[19]	Mao Guangjun , Zhao Enguang , Li Zhuxia , Zhuo Yizhong . In-medium △ Absorption Cross Section. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(S4): 387-390.
[20]	Ge Lingxiao , Zeng Xianghua . In-Medium Nucleon-Nucleon Cross Sections in the Nonrelativistic Energy Region. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S4): 389-396.

Access

Get Citation

Deepika Grover, Kapil Saraswat, Prashant Shukla and Venktesh Singh. Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of ν_μ off ¹²C[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(12): 123104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/123104

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2018-07-23

Fund

Supported by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India

Article Metric

Article Views(1665)
PDF Downloads(44)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of ν_μ off ¹²C

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Charged current quasi-elastic scattering of ν_μ off ¹²C

Corresponding author: Venktesh Singh,

HTML

目录