-
All calculations were performed within the framework of the Hartree-Fock approach, with phenomenological interaction in the form of Skyrme forces. Pairing correlations were treated within the BCS model. The standard nucleon-nucleon Skyrme potential reads [22]:
$ \begin{aligned}[b] V_{12} =& t_0 (1+x_0 P_\sigma) \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \\ &+ \frac{1}{2} t_1 (1+x_1 P_\sigma) \left[ \vec{k}'^2 \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) + \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \vec{k}^2 \right] \\ &+ t_2 (1+x_2 P_\sigma) \vec{k}' \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \vec{k} \\ &+ \frac{1}{6} t_3 (1+x_3 P_\sigma) [\rho(\frac{1}{2}(\vec{r}_1 + \vec{r}_2))]^\gamma \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \\ &+{\rm i} W_0 \vec{\sigma} [\vec{k}' \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \vec{k}]. \end{aligned} $
(1) Here,
$ \vec{r}_1 $ and$ \vec{r}_2 $ are nucleon coordinates,$\vec{k}= (\vec{\nabla}_1-\vec{\nabla}_2)/{(2i)}$ ,$ \vec{k}' $ is the operator complex-conjugate to$ \vec{k} $ (the corresponding conjugate operators$ \vec{\nabla}' $ act on the wave function to the left),$ \vec{\sigma}=\vec{\sigma}_1+\vec{\sigma}_2 $ ,$P_\sigma = \dfrac{1}{2}(1+\vec{\sigma}_1\vec{\sigma}_2)$ ,$ t_0..t_3 $ ,$ x_0..x_3 $ , and γ and$ W_0 $ are the interaction parameters.The expression for the tensor nucleon-nucleon interaction of zero radius was proposed in the first works of Skyrme [23]. It is given as
$ \begin{aligned}[b] V_{tens} =& \frac{1}{2} t_e \{ [3(\sigma_1 \cdot \vec{k}')(\sigma_2 \cdot \vec{k}') - (\sigma_1 \cdot \sigma_2) \vec{k}'^2] \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \\ &+ \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) [3(\sigma_1 \cdot \vec{k})(\sigma_2 \cdot \vec{k}) - (\sigma_1 \cdot \sigma_2) \vec{k}^2] \} \\ &+ t_o [3(\sigma_1 \cdot \vec{k}') \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) (\sigma_2 \cdot \vec{k}) - (\sigma_1 \cdot \sigma_2) \vec{k}' \delta(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) \vec{k}], \end{aligned} $
(2) where
$ t_e $ and$ t_o $ are tensor interaction parameters. The indices e and o correspond to the parity of states: the term$ \sim t_e $ affects the states of a pair of nucleons with relative orbital momentum$ L=0 $ and$ L=2 $ (S and D wave), while the term$ \sim t_o $ affects the states with$ L=1 $ and$ L=3 $ (P and F wave). Since the nucleon-nucleon tensor interaction works only in the state of a pair of nucleons with a total spin$ S=1 $ , the parts$ \sim t_e $ and$ \sim t_o $ describe tensor effects in the isoscalar and isovector channels, respectively.Relations (1) and (2) are used to obtain an expression for the energy density functional and, subsequently, the Hartree-Fock equations. The expression for the energy density corresponding to the nucleon-nucleon potential (1) is given in [22, 24].
The contribution of tensor forces to the energy density comes in form of the so-called
$ J^2 $ -terms [4, 25]:$ \mathcal{H}^t = \frac{1}{2} \alpha (\vec{J}^2_n+\vec{J}^2_p) + \beta \vec{J}_n \cdot \vec{J}_p, $
(3) where
$ \vec{J}_{p,n} $ are proton and neutron spin densities:$ \vec{J}_q(\vec{r}) = (-i) \sum\limits_{i, m_s, m_s'} \phi_i^*(\vec{r},m_s,q) [\nabla \times \vec{\sigma}] \phi_i(\vec{r},m_s',q). $
Here,
$ \phi_i $ are single-particle wave functions, and$ m_s $ is the nucleon spin projection. Notably,$ J^2 $ -terms arise from the exchange terms even without accounting for tensor forces. The inclusion of tensor interaction results in the dependence of$ \alpha, \beta $ on both the features of the central and tensor parts of the interaction [5, 18], as follows:$ \begin{aligned}[b] \alpha &= \alpha_C + \alpha_T, \;\; \beta = \beta_C + \beta_T, \\ \alpha_C &= \frac{1}{8}(t_1-t_2) - \frac{1}{8}(t_1x_1 + t_2x_2), \\ \beta_C &= - \frac{1}{8}(t_1x_1 + t_2x_2), \\ \alpha_T &= \frac{5}{4} t_o, \\ \beta_T &= \frac{5}{8} (t_e+t_o). \end{aligned} $
Indeed, only the isovector part of the tensor force is relevant for pairs of like nucleons, while both the isovector and isoscalar components contribute to
$ np $ -interaction.The impact of tensor interaction on single-particle energies (SPEs) is considered in detail in the works of Otsuka et al. [1, 9]. It was shown that if the neutron level
$ j' $ is filled in the given isotope chain, then the matrix elements of the tensor interaction$ V^T_{j,j'} $ between the$ j' $ neutrons and protons in$ j_>=l+1/2 $ and$ j_ <=l-1/2 $ states fulfill the following relation:$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} (2j_>+1) V^T_{j_> ,j'} + (2j_<+1) V^T_{j_< ,j'} = 0, \end{array} $
(4) where T is the isospin of the nucleon pair. Furthermore, the filling of
$ j'_< $ with neutrons increases the spin-orbit splitting between proton levels, and when$ j'_> $ is filled, this splitting, on the contrary, decreases. Otsuka's rule (4), which is commonly used to describe the tensor part of the$ np $ interaction, is also valid for identical nucleons, although there is still an ongoing debate regarding the sign of the tensor force contributions in the isovector channel. As such this is one of the questions we study extensively in this article.The effect of tensor forces on the spin-orbit splitting can be explained by their contribution to the one-particle potential being of similar structure to the contribution from the spin-orbit interaction. The sum of these two contributions, calculated as the first derivative of the energy density with respect to the nucleon density ρ, for protons (neutrons) reads [18]:
$ W_{p(n)}(r) = \frac{W_0}{2} (2 \nabla \rho_{p(n)} + \nabla \rho_{n(p)}) + \alpha J_{p(n)} + \beta J_{n(p)}. $
(5) In the
$ 1d2s $ -shell nuclei, the pairing of identical nucleons plays an important role. In our calculations, we used the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) [26] method, and the joint HF + BCS procedure was carried out in several iterations, each iteration including the solution of the self-consistent HF problem with subsequent application of the BCS scheme. A simple potential in the form of δ-forces was taken as the pair correlation potential. The magnitude of the pair forces for each nucleus was chosen so that the energy gap obtained during the BCS procedure for a given even nucleus was equal to$ \begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \Delta_q = - \dfrac{1}{4} (S_q(A + 1)- 2S_q(A) + S_q(A - 1)), \end{array} $
(6) where
$ S_q $ is the proton ($ q=p $ ) or neutron ($ q=n $ ) separation energy.Notably, we used the spherical symmetry approximation. Experimental data indicate the presence of deformation in stable silicon isotopes. The value of the quadrupole deformation parameter
$ ^{28} $ Si is$ \beta = -0.42\pm 0.02 $ [27]. For other silicon isotopes, there is no experimental information other than estimates based on the strength of E2 transitions$ B(E2) $ . The same can be said about most isotopes of nickel, although data on$ B(E2) $ points to values of$ \beta \simeq 0.1 \div 0.2 $ . In such a situation, the spherical approximation is a reasonable approach for model estimates and investigation of such features of nucleon interactions as tensor forces or nucleon pairing effects. -
The single-particle structure of even silicon isotopes
$ ^{28-42} $ Si and nickel isotopes$ ^{56-78} $ Ni were calculated using the SLy5+T [5] and SGII+T [28] parametrizations. Notably, these sets of parameters were initially selected without considering the tensor interaction component. The SLy5 parametrization [24] was chosen to realistically describe the main characteristics of symmetric nuclear matter and the binding energies and root-mean-square radii of doubly magic nuclei from oxygen to lead. The SGII interaction [29] was developed to describe collective nuclear excitations better. The parameters of the tensor interaction were obtained later in both cases, while the values of the initial parameters of the central part of the interaction were retained. Such a tactic, strictly speaking, violates the consistency of the fitting procedure. However, from the point of view of analyzing the effect of tensor forces on the structure of atomic nuclei, this kind of parametrization is more convenient, allowing comparison of the results of calculations with and without the tensor component. Notably, most currently existing parametrizations of Skyrme forces involving a tensor component agree on the signs of parameters$ \alpha_T<0 $ and$ \beta_T>0 $ and typically have their absolute value ranging up to around 200 MeV$ \cdot $ fm$ ^5 $ . In order to get a better understanding of how the$ np $ and isovector tensor forces compare with each other, we carried out some additional calculations with several interactions, namely SLy4(+T), SAMi(+T), and SGII with different tensor forces (which we will denote as SGII+T2 in the remainder of the article to avoid confusion), exhibiting$ \alpha_T $ and$ \beta_T $ in this wide range.Some characteristics of nuclear matter and the tensor force parameters for the mentioned interactions, are given in Table 1. The SGII+T parametrization serves as our choice of interaction with the largest contribution of tensor forces. Although this parameter set does not always adequately describe the characteristics of nuclei, it is very interesting as a test variant. Notably, in addition to tensor contributions, there are also differences for the main parts of the parameter sets: the SLy family forces give more realistic values of the symmetry energy and incompressibility of nuclear matter.
Interaction Ref. $\rho_0$ $E_0$ $K_{\infty}$ $a_s $ $\alpha_C $ $\beta_C$ $\alpha_T $ $\beta_T$ SGII [29] $0.158$ $-15.60$ $214.65$ $26.83$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$ SGII+T [28] $0.158$ $-15.60$ $214.65$ $26.83$ $-5.434$ $-53.171$ $-180$ $120$ SGII+T2 [30] $0.158$ $-15.60$ $214.65$ $26.83$ $-5.434$ $-53.171$ $-162.5$ $4.17$ SLy5 [24] $0.161$ $-15.98$ $229.92$ $32.01$ $80.2$ $-48.9$ $0$ $0$ SLy5+T [5] $0.161$ $-15.98$ $229.92$ $32.01$ $80.2$ $-48.9$ $-170$ $100$ SLy4 [24] $0.16$ $-15.97$ $229.9$ $32$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$ SLy4+T [31] $0.16$ $-15.97$ $229.9$ $32$ $81.79$ $-47.37$ $-105$ $15$ SAMi [32] $0.159$ $-15.93$ $245$ $28$ $101.88$ $31.78$ $0$ $0$ SAMi+T [33] $0.164$ $-16.15$ $244$ $29.7$ $112.79$ $35.13$ $-39.80$ $66.65$ Table 1. Characteristics of nuclear matter for SLy5, SGII, SLy4 and SAMi parametrizations: saturation density
$\rho_0$ (fm$^{-3}$ ), energy per nucleon$E_0$ (MeV), incompressibility$K_{\infty}$ (MeV), symmetry energy$a_s$ (MeV), and the parameters of the central$\alpha_C$ ,$\beta_C$ , tensor$\alpha_T$ , and$\beta_T$ contributions in$J^2$ -terms (MeV fm$^5$ ).The general scale of effects associated with considering tensor forces or pair correlations in comparison with the differences due to the properties of the central parts of the interaction can be illustrated by the binding energy per nucleon
$ \varepsilon = B/A $ obtained with various$ NN $ -interactions (Fig. 1). We see that the parametrization SLy5 is in the best agreement with the experimental values of the binding energies of silicon isotopes (Fig. 1a) in a fairly wide range, while SGII overestimates the binding energy in all of the isotopes under consideration. The same can be said of the results for nickel isotopes (Fig. 1b). Accounting for pairing, as well as the introduction of a tensor component, leads to overestimated values for almost all isotopes as well. Notably, the introduction of pairing appears to smooth out the shell effects. Finally, it can be seen that the calculation results depend much more strongly on the choice of the central interaction; the effects of tensor forces and nucleon pairing are comparable in magnitude and have a smaller impact on the properties of the ground states of the considered nuclides.Figure 1. (color online) Binding energy per nucleon
$\varepsilon$ in even silicon (a) and nickel (b) isotopes with N neutrons, with and without considering pairing correlations. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). Experimental data [34] are marked with dots.Figure 2 shows the dependences of proton
$ E^\pi_{nlj} $ and neutron$ E^\nu_{nlj} $ SPEs ($ nlj $ denoting the quantum numbers) on the number of neutrons N in even silicon isotopes$ ^{28-42} $ Si obtained with the SLy5+T and SGII+T parametrizations. For comparison, the results of the calculations are also given without considering the tensor contribution. Here and onwards, all the shown results were obtained with pairing correlations. Additionally, we show the value of the chemical potential of nucleons of the corresponding type that was estimated using the formula:Figure 2. (color online) SPEs in even silicon isotopes: proton (a, b) and neutron states (c, d). Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). Experimental evaluated data [35] are marked with dots. The dashed-dotted line shows the chemical potential of protons (neutrons) in figures a and b (c and d).
$ \lambda^{ \rm{(exp)}}_q = -\frac{S(A)+S(A+1)}{2}. $
(7) Let us consider the evolution of proton states. Fig. 2(a, b) shows that for both parametrizations the calculations agree satisfactorily with the experimental data estimates [35] for the
$ 1d_{5/2} $ and$ 2s_{1/2} $ states and underestimate higher states, while the SGII parametrization shows slightly better agreement in the region of neutron-rich isotopes. Including the tensor contribution does not affect the position of the$ 2s_{1/2} $ state. However, it affects the behavior of the$ 1d $ states and thus leads to some increase in the energy gap between$ 1d_{5/2} $ and$ 2s_{1/ 2} $ , which, as we shall see later, affects the populations of the corresponding states. Changes in the position of the$ 1d $ and$ 1p $ states upon inclusion of the tensor component are consistent with Otsuka's rule. As$ 1d_{3/2} $ is filled with neutrons, the proton states$ 1d_{5/2} $ and$ 1p_{3/2} $ with$ j_> $ attract more strongly, while the states$ 1d_{3/2} $ and$ 1p_{1/2} $ with$ j_< $ are repelled. Further filling of the state$ \nu 1f_{7/2} $ leads to the opposite effect. In the case of the SGII+T parametrization, the changes in the spin-orbit splitting of different levels are much more pronounced than in the case of SLy5+T. Apparently, in addition to the difference in the strength of the tensor interaction (in the SGII+T parametrization, the contribution of tensor forces is greater), the differences in the characteristics of the basic parametrizations also play a certain role. The response of the core structure to additional changes is stronger with smaller$ K_{\infty} $ values; in the case of SGII, the value of incompressibility is somewhat smaller.The change in the spin-orbit splitting between proton d-states as the
$ 1f_{7/2} $ shell is filled with neutrons is of great interest. Experimental data show the strongest splitting in the$ ^{34} $ Si magic nucleus. However, quantitative estimates differ greatly and can reach 10 MeV. We have previously discussed this issue in detail in [35] and will use the estimates from that paper for comparison. Fig. 3a shows the results of our calculations. Both variants of interaction lead to a splitting of d-states in$ ^{34} $ Si of about 9 MeV, and for other nuclei, they also overestimate the said splitting. However, in this case, the SGII+T interaction succeeds at reproducing the behavior of the dependence at a qualitative level.Figure 3. (color online) Splitting of proton (a) and neutron (b) states
$1d_{3/2} - 1d_{5/2}$ , as well as$1f_{7/2} - 1d_{3/2}$ states in silicon isotopes. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces).Regarding the influence of the neutron excess on the single-particle states of neutrons, the presence of tensor interaction here also leads to changes in SPEs, and the effect will be opposite compared to the case of
$ np $ -interaction. As seen from Fig. 2(c, d), as$ \nu 1d_{3/2} $ is filled, the neutron states with$ j_> $ are repelled, and with the filling of$ \nu 1f_{ 7/2} $ , the attraction is strengthened by the shell. At the same time, the unsatisfactory description of experimental estimates for$ 1d2s $ states should be stressed. On the other hand, it should be noted that the accuracy of the experimental data based on the spectroscopy of single-nucleon transfer reactions drops dramatically for states lying much lower than the Fermi surface. Nevertheless, Fig. 3(b) shows that for the range of nuclei up to$ ^{34} $ Si, including tensor forces is what makes it possible to qualitatively reproduce the dependence of the neutron spin-orbit splitting of the d-states.For neutron single-particle states, we can also consider the splitting between
$ 1d_{3/2} $ and$ 1f_{7/2} $ . The experimental data demonstrate a maximum in$ ^{34} $ Si related to the manifestation of the magic number$ N=20 $ and a substantial drop to very small values as$ \nu 1f_{7/2} $ is filled, which illustrates the decrease in the role of shell effects in highly neutron-rich silicon isotopes. As can be seen in Fig. 3(c), reproducing this character of the experimental dependence without including the tensor component is not possible. However, the SGII+T parametrization makes it possible to reproduce the dependence at a qualitative level. The results with SLy5+T also give a maximum in$ ^{34} $ Si, and the splitting value agrees with the experimental estimates.Notably, the scale of the effect for neutrons is comparable to that observed earlier for protons (Fig. 3a). In [9] it is shown that in the most elementary case, when
$ \alpha_T=\beta_T $ , the interaction of like nucleons (governed purely by the isovector component of the forces) is two times weaker than$ np $ -interaction (dependent on both isoscalar and isovector components). Therefore, traditionally, when considering the effects associated with tensor interaction, one treats the influence of the neutron excess on the states of protons in isotopes, or, vice versa, the influence of the number of protons on the states of neutrons in isotones. In the case of interactions SLy5+T and SGII+T obtained by fitting the experimental data,$ |\alpha_T|>|\beta_T| $ , indicating that the contribution from the isovector component of the tensor interaction may indeed be comparable to that from the$ np $ tensor interaction. This inequality holds for quite a few of the existing interactions, including SLy4+T, SkP+T, SkO+T [31], Sktxb [36], and the more recent SGII+T2 and SkO'+T interactions [30]. All of these were obtained perturbatively with the tensor terms added on top of the fixed central part. It may also be interesting to check the case when a parameter set was generated via a variational procedure, with parameters of the central part refitted altogether as tensor forces are included. An example of such a set would be SAMi [32] with its recently obtained counterpart SAMi+T [33]. Notably, for SAMi+T$ \alpha_T=-39.8 $ and$ \beta_T=66.7 $ MeV fm$ ^5 $ , and the mentioned inequality does not hold. For SGII+ T2, on the other hand,$ \alpha_T=-162.5 $ and$ \beta_T=4.7 $ MeV fm$ ^5 $ . As such, the isovector part responsible for the interaction of like nucleons should be dominant in this interaction.For the sake of verifying the impact of different components of tensor forces on the single-particle structure of silicon isotopes, we performed some few additional calculations with interactions SLy4 and SLy4+T, SGII+T2, SAMi and SAMi+T in
$ ^{28,34,42} $ Si with filled$ \nu 1d_{5/2} $ ,$ sd $ -shell, and$ \nu 1f_{7/2} $ respectively. The results are shown in Table 2. We note the significant effect tensor forces have on the splitting between the neutron states$ 1d_{3/2,5/2} $ and$ 1f_{7/2} $ when SLy4+T and SGII+T2 forces are used. Particularly, the$ \nu 1f_{7/2} - 1d_{3/2} $ splitting seems to be best reproduced with the SGII+T2 Skyrme forces. Indeed, the effect has an opposite sign compared to the Otsuka rules formulated for the$ np $ -tensor interaction, for all the parametrizations under consideration. Notably, SAMi predicts the opposite behavior of the neutron level splittings compared to those of the other interactions (maximum in$ 1d_{3/2,5/2} $ and minimum in$ 1f_{7/2} - 1d_{3/2} $ splitting in$ ^{34} $ Si), but these extrema are less pronounced when tensor forces are considered. The largest impact on the proton states is observed with SGII+T and SAMi+T interactions, the latter describing the behavior of the$ \pi 1d_{3/2} - 1d_{5/2} $ splitting the best.Parametrization $\pi 1d_{3/2}-1d_{5/2}$ $\nu 1d_{3/2}-1d_{5/2}$ $\nu 1f_{7/2}-1d_{3/2}$ $^{28}$ Si$^{34}$ Si$^{42}$ Si$^{28}$ Si$^{34}$ Si$^{42}$ Si$^{28}$ Si$^{34}$ Si$^{42}$ SiSGII 7.08 6.38 5.60 7.31 6.65 5.98 5.74 5.43 5.61 SGII+T 6.77 8.74 4.32 7.34 4.22 6.59 5.71 7.70 4.56 SGII+T2 8.91 8.16 7.02 9.35 7.13 8.31 3.81 5.00 3.18 SLy5 7.41 6.42 6.37 7.58 7.73 5.73 5.63 5.07 7.36 SLy5+T 8.54 8.48 6.75 8.96 7.23 7.90 4.35 5.58 4.98 SLy4 7.60 7.03 6.27 7.87 7.30 6.47 5.36 5.51 6.55 SLy4+T 8.60 7.65 7.35 8.90 8.06 7.51 4.40 4.78 5.53 SAMi 4.86 4.84 3.91 4.94 5.56 3.55 8.59 7.62 9.61 SAMi+T 5.24 5.83 3.87 5.42 5.79 4.36 8.34 7.68 9.22 exp 6.0±1.5 6.9±1.6 4.9±2.0 4.2±1.9 5.8±1.2 5.0±1.5 1.8±2.2 Table 2. Splitting between the proton and neutron
$1d_{3/2}$ and$1d_{5/2}$ levels, as well as the neutron$1f_{7/2}$ and$1d_{3/2}$ obtained with various Skyrme force parametrizations in$^{28,34,42}$ Si. Experimental values from [35] are shown at the end for comparison.For nickel isotopes, the general tendencies for the impact of the tensor force are the same, which brings about certain additional phenomena. Before discussing the results, we will first address the current state of available experimental data on neutron-rich nickel nuclei. In this work, we compare the calculated SPEs with those obtained from consistent stripping and pickup reaction analysis [37−45]. Analysis of stripping and pickup reactions is typically very sensitive to experimental conditions, the resolution of the obtained spectra, and the measurement range. For example, the authors of [40] compared the estimated SPEs of stable even
$ ^{58-64} $ Ni based on the single out states assigned the largest spectroscopic factors, with the results taking into account the state fragmentation. The largest deviations amounted to 2 MeV far from the Fermi level, which may be of importance to states with small SPEs. Furthermore, while such deviations may not be critical for the localization of individual single-particle states, the estimates of the spin-orbital splitting may differ significantly on a qualitative level in various approaches.Our calculations of SPEs in neutron-rich nickel isotopes, together with experimental data from the sources listed earlier, are shown on Fig. 4. For protons, the inversion of states
$ 1d_{3/2} $ and$ 2s_{1/2} $ taking place when tensor forces are accounted for is notable. Their initial reversal as the neutron$ fp $ -shell is filled, and second reversal to the original order as$ \nu 1g_{9/2} $ is filled, was predicted in [12] and recently in [10], and is reproduced here using the SGII+T parametrization. In light of recently confirmed experimental data in copper isotopes [47] obtained at RIBF, the behavior of the splitting between the$ \pi 2p_{3/2} $ and$ \pi 1f_{5/2} $ states is also of interest. The systematics of the first$ 3/2^- $ and$ 5/2^- $ states in these data suggest that the reversal of the corresponding proton orbitals takes place at around$ N=45 $ . While this is not obtained with the SLy5+T or SGII+T forces, SGII+T interaction does succeed at changing the ordering at$ N=50 $ . A thorough comparison of this and other approaches in reproducing the crossing between these levels in neutron-rich nickel isotopes is also given in [19].Figure 4. (color online) SPEs in even nickel isotopes: proton (a, b) and neutron (c, d) states. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). The dashed-dotted line shows the chemical potential of protons (neutrons) in figures a and b (c and d). Experimental evaluated data are marked with dots. Experimental data for the proton states were taken from [42] for
$^{56,78}$ Ni and [37] for other isotopes. Experimental data for the neutron states were taken from [42] for$^{56,78}$ Ni;$1f_{5/2}$ and$2p_{1/2, 3/2}$ states were taken from [41] for stable isotopes$^{58-64}$ Ni,$1g_{9/2}$ and$1f_{7/2}$ states in these isotopes were taken from [37] and [43], respectively.When it comes to neutron states in neutron-rich nickel isotopes, neutrons initially fill the
$ fp $ -shell, although the order of the filling within the shell appears to depend on the choice of the central part of the interaction, as seen in Fig. 4. Furthermore, the introduction of the strong tensor component, such as in SGII+T, may also affect the order of certain levels. We note the influence of tensor forces on the neutron$ 1f_{5/2} $ state that gets additionally attracted as the$ fp $ -shell is filled, which results in it getting pushed below the$ \nu 2p_{1/2} $ and then the$ \nu 2p_{3/2} $ state. Experimental data taken from [35] show that$ \nu 2p_{1/2} $ should indeed lie above the other states of the$ fp $ -shell, and SGII family interactions describe such ordering the best.The tensor effects in nickel isotopes can be most clearly observed on the example of the magic gap between the proton or neutron
$ 1f_{7/2} $ and$ 1f_{5/2} $ states (see Fig. 5a and b, respectively). Various experimental data for these splittings appear to differ by up to 2−3 MeV for various nuclides, but the general pattern described by the Otsuka rule emerges clearly. We note that including tensor forces allows for describing the local maximum and minimum in protons and neutron level splittings, respectively. The general scale of the effect is, once again, better described by the interaction SGII+T. Results of additional calculations performed with interactions SLy4(+T), SGII(+T2), and SAMi(+T) are presented in Table 3. While SAMi+T with the stronger$ np $ -component does reproduce qualitatively the maximum of the$ \pi 1f_{7/2,5/2} $ splitting for$ ^{68} $ Ni, it also severely underestimates said splitting on the entire chain of nickel isotopes, while SGII and SLy4 appear to give more reasonable values. Although no experimental data is currently available for the difference between the neutron$ \nu 1f_{7/2,5/2} $ SPEs in$ ^{56,68,78} $ Ni, some few data in$ ^{30,32,34} $ Ni indicates the decrease of the splitting towards$ ^{68} $ Ni (as seen in Fig. 5), which also is reproduced with SGII+T2 and SLy4+T. We suspect this suggests the correct expectation that the isovector part of tensor forces should be prominent and that the Otsuka rule may indeed work in the opposite way for$ np $ tensor forces and tensor forces between like nucleons.Figure 5. (color online) Splitting of proton (a) and neutron (b) states
$1f_{5/2} - 1f_{7/2}$ in nickel isotopes. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). For protons, experimental data from [37] and [42−46] are shown with black and white circles, respectively. For neutrons, experimental data from [41] and [43] are shown with black circles.Parametrization $\pi 1f_{5/2}-1f_{7/2}$ $\nu 1f_{5/2}-1f_{7/2}$ $^{56}$ Ni$^{68}$ Ni$^{78}$ Ni$^{56}$ Ni$^{68}$ Ni$^{78}$ NiSGII 7.26 6.27 5.67 7.52 6.67 5.92 SGII+T 6.97 8.58 5.24 7.48 4.16 5.94 SGII+T2 8.16 7.21 9.74 6.82 7.98 SLy5 7.77 6.22 6.37 7.97 8.19 6.21 SLy5+T 8.72 7.16 9.58 7.16 7.95 SLy4 8.07 7.08 6.47 8.37 7.53 6.77 SLy4+T 7.65 7.51 9.57 8.22 7.79 SAMi 4.42 4.54 3.54 4.44 5.70 3.26 SAMi+T 4.75 5.90 3.60 4.92 5.80 3.85 exp 7.5±1.6 7.0±1.0 5.5±0.9 Notably, the tensor terms in SAMi+T were fitted using the pseudodata of the neutron-proton drops coming from relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (RBHF) calculations rather than experimental data. The approach of comparing to meta-data generated within ab initio calculations allows for narrowing down the constraints on the possible nuclear density functionals, and has the benefit of avoiding the particle-vibration coupling which typically makes it harder to analyze experimental data. In recent works [48−50] employing the RBHF approach, it was shown that tensor forces in neutron and neutron-proton drops may work similarly for proton and neutron states as neutrons are added in the system. This result was indeed also obtained in [33] where interaction SAMi+T was originally proposed. As seen from Table 2 and Table 3, SAMi+T often predicts maxima for neutron-level splittings in cases when minima are obtained with other forces, and vice versa. The reasons can be traced down to the central part of the interaction, as the same behavior is obtained with SAMi without tensor terms. Evidently, these extremes in
$ ^{34} $ Si and$ ^{68} $ Ni are smoothed out for splittings between neutron states, and become more prominent for splittings between proton states as tensor terms are considered, meaning that even here the isovector and$ np $ tensor components work in opposite directions.Let us consider the effect of tensor forces on the occupation of single-particle states near the Fermi level. In the BCS approach, this characteristic depends on the energy of the single-particle state
$ E_{nlj} $ :$ n_{nlj} = \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 - \frac{E_{nlj}-\lambda}{\sqrt{(E_{nlj}-\lambda)^2 + \Delta^2}} \right), $
(8) where λ is the chemical potential, and Δ is the energy gap. Since accounting for tensor interaction results in a change in the energies of single-particle states, these changes should be reflected in the corresponding occupation numbers
$ n_{nlj} $ .The calculated single-particle occupation numbers for even silicon isotopes are presented in Fig. 6. Both parametrizations, SLy5+T and SGII+T, effectively reduce the effects of nucleon pairing. Pairing correlations of nucleons lead to smearing of the Fermi level, with states above
$ \lambda_q $ getting partially filled. Accounting for the tensor interaction leads to a decrease in this effect: the population of the levels with$ E_{nlj}<\lambda $ (see Fig. 2) increases. This is most clearly manifested in calculations for the$ ^{34} $ Si isotope, where in the case of the SGII+T parametrization with a large tensor component, neutron pairing actually disappears. Using proton states as an example, one can see that in silicon isotopes, the Fermi level lies between the$ \pi 1d_{5/2} $ and$ \pi 1 d_{3/2} $ levels. When the contribution of tensor forces is considered, the splitting between these states increases; accordingly, due to moving away from the Fermi level, the population of subshells with energies above$ \lambda_p $ decreases. The population of neutron states changes according to the same patterns: an increase in the splitting between the$ \nu 1f_{7/2} $ and$ \nu 1d_{3/2} $ levels, between which the Fermi level passes for nuclei near$ ^{34} $ Si, effectively leads to a decrease in pairing correlations. It is important to note that the results also strongly depend on the properties of the central part of the interaction: in the case of SLy5, the neutron level$ 2p_{3/2} $ can turn out to be in the continuum for all neutron-rich isotopes (Fig. 6c), and in the case of SGII in the$ ^{38-42} $ Si isotopes, it is in the potential well (Fig. 6d). Thus, in the case of SLy5(+T), the magic core$ ^{42} $ Si is closed. As in the case of SPEs, theoretical calculations do not agree with experimental estimates of the populations of neutron states. This suggests that other effects must be considered in addition to tensor forces, primarily the deformation of nuclides.Figure 6. (color online) Occupation numbers of (a, b) proton and (c, d) neutron single-particle levels near the Fermi surface in silicon isotopes. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). Experimental data [35] are marked with dots.
We only considered neutron pairing for nickel isotopes, as
$ Z=28 $ is a magic number. Tensor forces result in much the same phenomenon: nucleons are pushed below the Fermi level, effectively decreasing the pairing correlations, , as seen from Fig. 7. Here, once again, we notice the difference in occupation order between neutron states$ 2p_{1/2} $ and$ 1f_{5/2} $ . This correlates with the order of these states in Fig. 4, and the correct reproduction of ordering from experimental data is achieved with SGII interactions. Admittedly, SGII without the tensor component appears to give better results here, which is due to inconsistencies in the fitting procedure.Figure 7. (color online) Occupation numbers of neutron single-particle levels near the Fermi surface in nickel isotopes. Solid (dashed) lines show calculations with tensor forces (without considering the tensor forces). Experimental data [41] for the
$1f_{5/2}$ and$2p_{1/2, 3/2}$ states and [37] for state$1g_{9/2}$ are marked with dots.
Tensor force impact on shell evolution in neutron-rich Si and Ni isotopes
- Received Date: 2023-09-28
- Available Online: 2024-04-15
Abstract: The influence of the tensor interaction of nucleons on the characteristics of neutron-rich silicon and nickel isotopes was studied in this work. Tensor forces are considered within the framework of the Hartree-Fock approach with the Skyrme interaction. The addition of a tensor component of interaction is shown to improve the description of the splittings between different single-particle states and decrease nucleon-nucleon pairing correlations in silicon and nickel nuclei. Special attention was directed toward the role of isovector tensor forces relevant to the interaction of like nucleons.