-
Within the framework of Euler-Heisenberg theory, the Lagrangian with Lorentz and gauge invariants was constructed as [24, 25],
$ \begin{aligned} {\cal{L}}_{EH}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} +\frac{\mu}{4}\left[(F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu})^{2} +\frac{7}{4}(-^{\ast}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu})^{2}\right], \end{aligned} $
(1) where μ is the parameter demonstrating the electromagnetic self-interactions,
$ \begin{aligned} \mu=\frac{2\alpha^{2}}{45m_{e}^{4}} \end{aligned} $
(2) and α is the fine structure constant,
$ m_{e} $ being electron mass. It is noted that$ ^{\ast}F^{\mu\nu}=\dfrac{1}{2\sqrt{-g}}\varepsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} F^{\rho\sigma} $ is dual of$ F_{\mu\nu} $ , the electromagnetic field tensor [24, 25]. The μ-term in the Lagrangian (1) involves the square of the electromagnetic field tensor, leading the appearance of nonlinear term for gauge field in the field equation [24, 25].The four-dimensional action of general relativity coupled to the nonlinear electromagnetic field can be expressed as [24−26],
$ \begin{aligned} S_{EH}=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{M^{4}}{\rm d}^{4}x\sqrt{-g} \left(\frac{R}{4}+\Lambda+{\cal{L}}_{EH}\right) \end{aligned} $
(3) resulting in the field equations, the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg equations [26, 30]. Here g is the determinant of the metric tensor and R is the Ricci scalar. As a solution to the field equations, the metric in a static spherically symmetric form for Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black hole surrounded by the strong electromagnetic field is [26, 28, 29],
$ \begin{aligned} {\rm d}s^{2}=f(r){\rm d}t^{2}-\frac{{\rm d}r^{2}}{f(r)}-r^{2}{\rm d}\theta^{2} -r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta {\rm d}\varphi^{2} \end{aligned} $
(4) with the metric function,
$ \begin{aligned} f(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^{2}}{r^{2}}-\frac{\mu Q^{4}}{20r^{6}} +\frac{r^{2}}{l^{2}} ,\end{aligned} $
(5) where M is the mass of the black hole and Q is its electric charge. Here l is the AdS radius corresponding to the cosmological constant like
$ \Lambda=-\dfrac{3}{l^{2}} $ . It is noted that μ is the Euler-Heisenberg parameter [26, 28, 29]. With$ \mu=0 $ , the metric (4) with its component (5) reduces to be Reissner-Nordstrom ones [26, 28, 29]. The nonlinear effect mainly appeared as μ-term with the fourth power of electric charge and the negative sixth power of the radial coordinate in the spacetime metric is due to the vacuum polarization, leading the compact object more gravitationally attractive than the Reissner-Nordstrom-AdS black hole [26, 28, 29]. According to the figures showing the behaviors of the metric functions of the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg black hole and Reissner-Nordstrom black hole from Ref. [30], the shapes of the curves beyond the outer horizons belonging to the two kinds of black holes respectively are similar. Maybe the motion of test particles or lights around the gravitational sources may not exhibit the subtle difference between the black holes with or without the additional corrections owing to the electromagnetic self-interactions clearly. It is probable to compare the thermodynamic properties of the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes with those of the corresponding celestial bodies without nonlinear effect. We also wonder whether the own features of the internal constitutions of the nonlinear effect-corrected black holes may bring about their evolution. It is indispensable to further the research on the black holes under the nonlinear electrodynamics in the thermodynamics direction. The horizon radii can be thought as real roots of the equation like$ f(r)=0 $ [1]. Here we can let the external horizon$ r_{+} $ satisfy the condition as follows [30],$ \begin{aligned} f(r_+)=0 \end{aligned} $
(6) By combining the Eqs. (5) and (6), the black hole mass can be denoted as [30, 31],
$ \begin{aligned} M=\frac{r_+}{2}\left(1+\frac{Q^{2}}{r_+^{2}}-\frac{\mu Q^{4}}{20r_+^{6}}+\frac{r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right). \end{aligned} $
(7) According to the definition [31], the Hawking temperature for this kind of black holes,
$ T=\frac{f'(r)}{4\pi}|_{r=r_+} =\frac{1}{4\pi r_+}\left(1-\frac{Q^{2}}{r_+^{2}} +\frac{\mu Q^{4}}{4r_+^{6}}+\frac{3r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right), $
(8) while the entropy of black hole introduces [68],
$ \begin{aligned} S=\pi r_+^{2} \end{aligned} $
(9) also written as
$ S=\dfrac{A}{4} $ where$ A=4\pi r_{+}^{2} $ is the area of horizon [68]. The Hawking temperature versus the horizon is depicted in the Fig. 1. The asymptotic behavior of the temperature are$\mathop\lim\limits_{r_{+}\longrightarrow 0}T=\dfrac{1}{4\pi r_{+}}\dfrac{\mu Q^{4}}{4r_{+}^{6}}>0 $ and$\mathop\lim\limits_{r_{+}\longrightarrow\infty}T= \dfrac{1}{4\pi r_{+}}\dfrac{3r_{+}^{2}}{l^{2}} > 0$ which corresponding to the curves in the Fig. 1. The Fig. 1 also demonstrates that the curves with larger factor μ locate above the ones under the weaker nonlinear effect in the small horizon scope and the curves of Hawking temperature with different values of μ seem to coincide in the case of huge black holes. Within the region with small$ r_{+} $ , the temperature keeps positive, which is different from Reissner-Nordstrom metric [40, 41]. It is manifest that the curves of temperature function$ T(r_{+}) $ is concave in view of the Fig. 1. The condition equations are given in[40, 41],Figure 1. The solid, dotted and dashed curves corresponding to the dependence of Hawking temperature of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the canonical ensemble on the horizon for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.08, 0.1, 0.14 $ respectively.$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial T}{\partial r_+}=0, \end{aligned} $
(10) $ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial^{2}T}{\partial r_+^{2}}=0. \end{aligned} $
(11) Substituting the temperature (8) into the Eq. (10) and Eq. (11), we obtain the minimum of Hawking temperature, charge and horizon radius at the extreme point of temperature as follows,
$ \begin{aligned} r_{c}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{l^{2}+l\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu}} {\sqrt{3(l^{2}+l\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu})-7\mu}}, \end{aligned} $
(12) $ \begin{aligned} Q_{c}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\frac{(l^{2}+l\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu})^{\frac{3}{2}}} {3(l^{2}+l\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu})-7\mu}, \end{aligned} $
(13) $ \begin{aligned} T_{c}=\frac{1}{28\pi l}\frac{32l+24\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu}} {\sqrt{3(l^{2}+l\sqrt{l^{2}-7\mu})-7\mu}}. \end{aligned} $
(14) For the sake of the real quantities, the condition
$\mu\leq{l^{2}}/{7}$ must be obeyed. It is obvious that the results from Eqs. (7), (8), (12)−(14) will recover to be those in Refs. [40, 41, 67] when$ \mu=0 $ . The equation$T(r_{+})= T_{0} > T_{c}$ has two roots in contrast to the Fig. 1. -
Now we must investigate the specific thermal characteristics of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes. It should be pointed out that the gravitational sources involve the charges and the sources evolve under different conditions [24−26, 28, 29]. We start to discuss the thermodynamic stability and phase structure of the black holes in the canonical ensemble where the charge is invariant. According to the approach of Refs. [40, 41] and with the help of Eqs. (7)−(9), the Helmholtz free energy
$ F=M-TS $ is expressed as,$ \begin{aligned} F=\frac{r_+}{4}\left(1+\frac{3Q^{2}}{r_+^{2}}-\frac{7\mu Q^{4}}{20r_+^{6}}-\frac{r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right). \end{aligned} $
(15) We connect the free energy (15) with the temperature (8) to plot the curves with the self-interaction coupling μ in the Fig. 2. The shapes of curves with different values of parameter μ are similar. There exists a point on the each curve as the dependence of Helmholtz free energy on the Hawking temperature and the free energy as a function of temperature is not derivable at the point. The Helmholtz free energy is a multiple valued function of Hawking temperature according to the Fig. 2. When the temperature is higher than the ones at the underivable point, a series of curves for small free energy due to several valued μ are nearly identical. The underivable point of the Helnholtz free energy can be thought as the critical point and certainly the relevant temperature is the critical temperature denoted as
$ T_{c} $ .Figure 2. The solid, dotted and dashed curves of the Helmholtz free energy of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$\mu=0.08,\; 0.1, \;0.14$ respectively.It is also noted that the black hole satisfies the first law of thermodynamics [69],
$ \begin{aligned} {\rm d}M=T{\rm d}S+\Phi {\rm d}Q ,\end{aligned} $
(16) where
$ \begin{aligned} \Phi=\frac{Q}{r_+} \end{aligned} $
(17) is the electric potential. The corollary for the free energy can be written as [69]:
$ \begin{aligned} {\rm d}F=-S{\rm d}T+\Phi {\rm d}Q .\end{aligned} $
(18) In the ensemble with fixed charge, the entropy of the black hole is shown as [69]:
$ \begin{aligned} S_{Q}=-\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}\right)_{Q}. \end{aligned} $
(19) In view of the temperature (8) and free energy (15), the entropy of black hole like Eq. (9) can be varied again [68]. Because of the Eq. (8) and Eq. (19), the relation between the entropy and temperature of the charged black holes within the frame of nonlinear electrodynamics can be depicted in the Figs. 3−5 with
$ \mu= $ 0.08, 0.1, 0.14 respectively. The profiles of curves based on each diagram also resemble each other. If the temperature approaches the critical value$ T_{c} $ , the entropy (19) will become$ \mathop\lim\limits_{T\longrightarrow T_{c}}S_{Q}=-{\mathop\lim\limits_{T\longrightarrow T_{c}}\bigg(\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial r_{+}}\bigg)_{Q}}\Big/{\mathop\lim\limits_{T\longrightarrow T_{c}}\bigg(\dfrac{\partial T}{\partial r_{+}}\bigg)_{Q}}\longrightarrow\infty $$ because of the condition (10) [40, 41]. It is discovered that the tangent line of the entropy function at the critical point$ T_{c} $ is perpendicular to the T-axis in the figures. The critical point$ T_{c} $ can be thought as the common boundary. To each figure, we find that the entropy curve starts to divide into two branches at the common boundary. In addition the sufficiently high surface temperature of black hole like$ T>T_{c} $ corresponds to two values of the entropy. Further the slopes of tangent lines for the upper branch keep positive and the lower part reflects the decreasing function of temperature with negative slopes. According to the black hole entropy (9) from Ref. [68], the upper parts of entropies describe the large black holes and the lower branch refers to the source with small size.Figure 3. The curves of the entropy of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.08 $ .Figure 4. The curves of the entropy of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.1 $ .Figure 5. The curves of the entropy of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.14 $ .Based on the analysis above, we continue analyzing the heat capacity of the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg black holes in the ensemble. According to the thermodynamics of black holes [1, 31, 40, 41, 68], the heat capacity at fixed charge is given by:
$ \begin{aligned} C_{Q}=T\left(\frac{\partial S_{Q}}{\partial T}\right)_{Q} .\end{aligned} $
(20) From Figs. 3−5, it is clear that the temperature region formed with
$ T\geq T_{c} $ means that the temperature keeps positive. The slopes of tangent lines of the upper entropy curves are positive while the slopes of lower part is negative. We can argue that large Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes with positive heat capacity are thermodynamically stable, while the smaller ones with negative heat capacity will evaporate.The stability of a black hole needs to be investigated in a systematic way. The possibility for the fragmentation of a black hole claimed that the black hole entropy must increase owing to the second law of thermodynamics during its evolution [70]. Now we wonder whether the charged black holes under the influence from the self-interaction can break into pieces. The original black hole can be thought as the initial state and certainly the final state may consist of two black holes subject to the conservation of mass and charge in the process of fragmentation. During this fragmentation, the mass and charge of the homogeneous source will be rewritten as [70]:
$ \begin{aligned} M=\varepsilon M+(1-\varepsilon)M \end{aligned} $
(21) and
$ \begin{aligned} Q=\varepsilon Q+(1-\varepsilon)Q \end{aligned} $
(22) respectively. The ratio is limited as
$ 0\leq\varepsilon\leq 1 $ [71]. After splitting, one Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black hole has its metric as:$ \begin{aligned} {\rm d}s^{2}=f_{1}(r){\rm d}t^{2}-\frac{{\rm d}r^{2}}{f_{1}(r)}-r^{2}{\rm d}\theta^{2} -r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta {\rm d}\varphi^{2}, \end{aligned} $
(23) where
$ \begin{aligned} f_{1}(r)=1-\frac{2\varepsilon M}{r}+\frac{\varepsilon^{2}Q^{2}} {r^{2}}-\frac{\mu\varepsilon^{4}Q^{4}}{20r^{6}}+\frac{r^{2}}{l^{2}} \end{aligned} $
(24) with mass
$ \varepsilon M $ and charge$ \varepsilon Q $ . The metric function$ f_{2}(r) $ replaces$ f_{1}(r) $ in the metric (23) and the metric of the other part possessing mass$ (1-\varepsilon)M $ and charge$ (1-\varepsilon)Q $ is obtained as:$ \begin{aligned} f_{2}(r)=1-\frac{2(1-\varepsilon)M}{r}+\frac{(1-\varepsilon)^{2}Q^{2}} {r^{2}}-\frac{\mu(1-\varepsilon)^{4}Q^{4}}{20r^{6}}+\frac{r^{2}}{l^{2}}. \end{aligned} $
(25) The metric with component function
$ f_{2}(r) $ belongs to the background of the new Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg AdS black hole that has mass$ (1-\varepsilon)M $ and charge$ (1-\varepsilon)Q $ . The entropy difference between the initial black hole and the two fragmented parts can be expressed as [70]:$ \Delta S=\Delta S(\varepsilon) =(\pi r_{1}^{2}+\pi r_{2}^{2})-\pi r_+^{2} $
(26) The fragmented black holes have their own horizons
$ r_{1} $ and$ r_{2} $ satisfying$ f_{1}(r_{1})=0 $ and$ f_{2}(r_{2})=0 $ respectively. The entropy difference between the initial Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black hole and the final system including two black holes is shown graphically in the Fig. 6. Figure 6 shows that the difference keeps negative no matter how considerable the nonlinear effect is. In the ensemble, the division of this kind of AdS black holes can not happen spontaneously. The nonlinear effect factor just adjust the magnitude of the entropy difference within its region like$ \varepsilon\in[0, 1] $ , but the sign of the difference remains negative. Therefore, charged AdS black holes involving electromagnetic self-interactions will not split according to the second law of thermodynamics. We can argue that the self-interactions may make the curves for the dependence of entropy difference on the ratio ε different a little, but the nonlinear influence can not change the curves greatly. Within the region of ratio ε, the entropy differences keep negative. -
It is necessary to discuss the stability and phase structure of charged black holes revised by the self-interactions when the potential is invariant. By substituting the definition of electric potential like Eq. (17) into the black hole's mass (17) and the temperature (8), the corresponding thermodynamic variables like the black hole's mass and its Hawking temperature are:
$ \begin{aligned} M=\frac{r_+}{2}\left(1+\Phi^{2}-\frac{\mu \Phi^{4}}{20r_+^{2}} +\frac{r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right) \end{aligned} $
(27) and
$ \begin{aligned} T=\frac{1}{4\pi r_+}\left(1-\Phi^{2}+\frac{\mu \Phi^{4}}{4r_+^{2}} +\frac{3r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right). \end{aligned} $
(28) When the potential Φ is fixed, the asymptotic behavior of the temperature is
$\mathop\lim\limits_{r_{+}\longrightarrow 0}T=\dfrac{\mu\Phi^{4}}{16\pi r_{+}^{3}} > 0$ for larger values under stronger μ influence and$\mathop\lim\limits_{r_{+}\longrightarrow\infty}T=\dfrac{3}{4\pi l^{2}r_{+}} > 0$ which is equal to the asymptotic ones in the canonical ensemble as discussed earlier. The Hawking temperatures depending on the black hole horizon under the influence of electromagnetic self-interactions are depicted in the Fig. 7. It should be pointed out that the curves shapes involving some properties in the Fig. 7 resemble those in the Fig. 1. The temperature curves are also concave, which is similar to the works of the black holes in the fixed-charge ensembles. With the further investigations on the Hawking temperature relating to the horizon, the minimum temperature at the point is listed as follows,Figure 7. The solid, dotted and dashed curves corresponding to the dependence of Hawking temperature of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the grand canonical ensemble on the horizon for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.08, 0.1, 0.14 $ respectively.$ T_{\rm min}=T|_{r_+=r_{0}} =\frac{1}{4\pi r_{0}}\left(1-\Phi^{2}+\frac{\mu\Phi^{4}}{4r_{0}^{2}} +\frac{3}{l^{2}}r_{0}^{2}\right) $
(29) with
$ \begin{aligned} r_{0}=\frac{l}{\sqrt{6}}\sqrt{1-\Phi^{2}+\sqrt{(1-\Phi)^{2} +\frac{9\mu\Phi^{4}}{l^{2}}}}. \end{aligned} $
(30) There are two valued
$ r_{+} $ to support the equation$T(r_{+}) > T_{\rm min}$ , one$ r_{+} $ for smaller black hole and the other for the larger one.In the grand canonical ensembles, the Gibbs free energy is defined as [40, 41],
$ \begin{aligned} G=M-TS-\Phi Q .\end{aligned} $
(31) From the first law of thermodynamics for black holes in Eq. (16), the Gibbs potential function can be demonstrated as [40, 41],
$ \begin{aligned} {\rm d}G=-S{\rm d}T-Q{\rm d}\Phi .\end{aligned} $
(32) In virtue of the mass (22) and temperature (23), the Gibbs free energy is obtained,
$ \begin{aligned} G=\frac{r_+}{4}\left(1-\Phi^{2}-\frac{7\mu\Phi^{4}}{20r_+^{2}} -\frac{r_+^{2}}{l^{2}}\right). \end{aligned} $
(33) We plot the Gibbs potential of the nonlinear-effect-corrected black holes involving charges as function of temperature graphically with a fixed electric potential. Having investigated the curves with allowed values of nonlinear factor μ, we find that the shapes of the Gibbs potential curves for different values of μ resemble each other. The curve of Gibbs function with
$ \mu=0.1 $ is shown in Fig 8. It should be noted that the point of Gibbs free energy at the minimum temperature is non-derivable, which is similar to the Helmholtz free energy in the canonical ensemble discussed earlier.Figure 8. The curves of the Gibbs potential of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the grand canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.1 $ .We use the differential expression (Eq.32) to obtain the entropy of the nonlinear-corrected and charged black hole [40, 41],
$ \begin{aligned} S_{\Phi}=-\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}\right)_{\Phi}. \end{aligned} $
(34) Using the temperature (28) and the Gibbs potential (Eq. 33), we plot the entropy function with various values of μ to specify the nonlinear effects in the three diagrams numbered as Fig. 9−11. A series of entropy curves are similar although the parameter of self-interactions μ has different values. It is interesting that the upper portion of the entropy stands for the large black hole and the lower one belongs to the compact object with small size. The phase transition will happen at the joint of the two parts of entropy curves relating to the temperature. The critical temperature
$ T_{c} $ for the underivable point of Gibbs potential is related to the nonlinear effect factor μ. It is shown that the slopes of tangent lines for the upper curves of entropy keep positive, meaning that the relatively large charged black hole under nonlinear influence is stable. The smaller black holes with negative heat capacity will evaporate.Figure 9. The curves of the entropy of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes in the grand canonical ensemble as functions of the temperature for nonlinear factors
$ \mu=0.08 $ .
The thermodynamic stability and phase structure of the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes
- Received Date: 2024-08-08
- Available Online: 2024-12-15
Abstract: In both the canonical ensemble and grand canonical ensemble, the thermodynamic stability and phase structure of Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes are studied. We derive the Hawking temperature, Helmholtz free energy, Gibbs potential, entropy and heat capacity of the black holes. We compute the minimum temperature to find that a phase transition may happen at the lowest point. The entropy-temperature diagram consists of two parts. The upper part belonging to the large black holes under the influence from the electromagnetic self-interactions keeps the positive heat capacity, leading the huge compact objects to survive. The lower curves corresponding to small black holes show that the heat capacity of the tiny black holes is negative, which means that the nonlinear-effect-corrected smaller sources will evaporate. The further discussions show that the nonlinear effect modifies the thermodynamic quantities, but the corrections limited by the nonlinear factor μ with allowed values can not change the properties and the phase structure fundamentally and thoroughly. We argue that the influence from self-interaction can not make the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg-AdS black holes to split under the second law of thermodynamics.