-
The standard form of the Skyrme interaction and its energy density functional can be found in Ref. [45]. Within the Skyrme HF+BCS approximation, the quasiparticle wave functions and their quasiparticle energies are obtained from the self-consistent equation,
$ \left(-{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m_{b}^{\ast}({\bf{r}})}\cdot{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}+U_{b}({\bf{r}})\right)\varphi_{b}({\bf{r}}) = \varepsilon_{b}\varphi_{b}({\bf{r}}), $
(1) Where
$ U_{b}({\bf{r}}) = V_{c}^{b}({\bf{r}})+\delta_{b,proton}V_{coul}({\bf{r}}) -iV_{so}^{b}({\bf{r}})\cdot({\boldsymbol{\nabla}}\times{\boldsymbol{\sigma}})+ V_{pair}^{b} $ ,$ V_{c}^{b}({\bf{r}}) $ is the central potential field for nucleons,$ V_{coul}({\bf{r}}) $ is the Coulomb potential,$ V_{so}^{b}({\bf{r}}) $ is the spin-orbit potential, and$ V_{pair}^{b} $ is the pairing potential. For the Skyrme HF calculations, the pairing potential is blocked.We employ a density dependent zero range pairing force in our calculations, which is expressed as,
$ V_{pair}({\bf{r}}_{1},{\bf{r}}_{2}) = V_{0}\left [1-\eta\left (\frac{\rho({\bf{r}})}{\rho_{0}}\right )\right ]\delta({\bf{r}}_{1}-{\bf{r}}_{2}). $
(2) where
$ \rho({\bf{r}}) $ is the nucleon density,$ \rho_{0} $ is the saturation density of nucleons (with a numerical value of 0.16${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ ), and η can take values of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.0, corresponding to surface, mixed, and volume pairing correlations[46, 47], respectively. Since the mixed type pairing interaction has the advantages of surface and volume pairing interactions, so we adopt it as the pairing interaction in our calculations. By fitting the experimental neutron pairing gap (1.39 MeV) of$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ calculated through a five-point formula, the strength$ V_{0} $ of the pairing force can be determined, the values of$ V_{0} $ are -561.8, -563.3, -579.5, -588.7, and -589.3 MeV$ \cdot $ ${\rm{fm}} ^3 $ for SAMi-27 to SAMi-35, respectively.The isovector giant dipole resonance states can be obtained from the RPA or quasiparticle RPA[48]. The well-known RPA (QRPA) method in matrix form is given by,
$ \left( \begin{array}{cc} A & B \\ -B^* &- A^* \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} X^{\nu} \\ Y^{\nu} \end{array} \right) = E_{\nu} \left( \begin{array}{c} X^{\nu} \\ Y^{\nu} \end{array} \right), $
(3) where
$ E_{\nu} $ is the excitation energy of the$ {\nu}-{\rm{th}} $ excited state, and$ {\rm{X}}^{\nu} $ ,$ {\rm{Y}}^{\nu} $ are amplitudes for forward and backward transitions, respectively.The reduced transition matrix strength can be expressed as,
$ B(EJ,i\rightarrow f) = \frac{1}{2J_{i}+1}\left|\langle f|\left|\hat{F}_{J}\right||i\rangle\right|^{2} $
where
$ \hat{F}_{J} $ is the external field transition operator. For the isovector giant dipole resonance, the external field operator is,$ \hat{F}_{1u} = \frac{N}{A}\sum\limits_{p = 1}^{Z}r_{p}Y_{1u} -\frac{Z}{A}\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N}r_{n}Y_{1u}. $
(4) -
Firstly we employe the Skyrme HF plus RPA methods to compute the ground-state properties, excited states of
$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ as well as the constraints on the density dependence of symmetry energy. The effect of pairing on the results will be discussed in the last paragraph of this scetion. The dipole strength distributions of$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ are shown in Fig. 1, the results are calculated by using SMAi-J Skyrme interactions. One can see that the pygmy dipole resonances are located at energy around 11 MeV for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ (9 MeV for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ ), while the giant dipole resonances are located at energy around 16 MeV for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ (14 MeV for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ ). As shown in the figures, the dipole strength distributions for two nuclei are much sensitive to density dependence of the symmetry energy, not only for the giant dipole resonances, but also for the pygmy dipole resonances. For the interaction with larger symmetry energy, it gives a stronger response strength, and a lower peak energy for giant dipole resonance, this happens both for the strength distributions of$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ . This could be explained as the following: in general, there is an inverse correlation between the particle-hole configuration energies and their contribution to the giant resonance states in RPA calculations. If the configuration energies decrease (increase), their partial reduced transition amplitudes increase (decrease). The properties mentioned above are usually used to constrain the equation of state of asymmetric nuclear matter[14, 37, 38, 42].Figure 1. (color online) The dipole strength distributions of
$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ (a) and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ (b), the results are calculated by SAMi-J interactions.SAMi-27 SAMi-29 SAMi-31 SAMi-33 SAMi-35 J(MeV) 22.9(27.0) 23.2(29.0) 23.4(31.0) 23.9(33.0) 24.4(35.0) L(MeV) 34.1(30.0) 44.5(51.6) 55.8(74.4) 66.7(95.4) 77.2(115.0) Table 1. The symmetry energies (J) and its slope parameters (L) at density of 0.11 (0.16)
${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ for the Skyrme interactions used in this work.In Ref. [38], the properties of pygmy dipole resonances of
$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ have been suggested to obtain the information of symmetry energy at saturation density. Several representative relativistic and non-relativistic effective interactions are adopted in the calculations. In this work, we will use the pygmy dipole states given by SAMi-J Skyrme interactions to constrain the properties of symmetry energy. For such interactions, the symmetry energies at$ \rho\simeq $ 0.1${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ are kept unchanged. So they could have different behaviours at the densities of 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ and 0.16${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ , respectively. Also the incompressibility coefficients of these interactions are kept as 245 MeV. Such features may give a smaller uncertainty on the constrained results. For the convenience of readers, we show the calculated symmetry energies and its slope parameters at density of 0.11 (0.16)${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ for the SAMi-J Skyrme interactions in Table I. Experimentally the percentage of energy-weighted sum rule exhausted by the pygmy dipole resonances in$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ has been measured with the LAND-FRS facility at GSI, Darmstadt in 2005. The measured value of the EWSR percentage for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ is 2.6% ± 1.6%[34]. Later, the EWSR percentage exhausted by the$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ pygmy dipole resonances has been measured by using the RISING setup at the fragment separator of GSI in 2009. The measured EWSR percentage for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ is 5.0% ± 1.5%[36]. In Fig. 2 (a), the EWSR percentages exhausted by pygmy dipole resonances in$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ are plotted as function of symmetry energy slope parameters at nuclear saturation density. The solid circles (blue) and squares (green) are the results calculated by using SAMi-J Skyrme effective interactions for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ , the blue and green lines are the fitted results. It is seen that the calculated EWSR percentages show very good linear function of the slope parameters at nuclear saturation density. It means that the EWSR percentage is very sensitive to the density dependence of symmetry energy. The shaded areas with blue and green colors are the experimental results for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ , respectively. The constrained slope parameter L is to be in the interval 46.8–97.4 MeV for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and 34.0–93.2 MeV for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ . Considering the overlapped area constrained from two nuclei yields the final constraints: the slope parameter L at saturation density is in the range of 46.8–93.2 MeV, which overlaps with the value in Ref. [38]. In Fig. 2 (b), the good linear correlation of symmetry energies J and its slope parameters L of SAMi-J interactions at nuclear saturation density is shown. We can deduce the value of symmetry energy from the obtained range of slope parameter. J is in the range of 28.5–32.9 MeV, it is a little bit smaller than the value in Ref. [38], where J is 31.0–33.6 MeV.Figure 2. (color online) Panel (a), the percentage of EWSR exhausted by the PDR in
$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ as function of symmetry energy slope parameter L at density of 0.16${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . The solid circles (for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ ) and squares (for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ ) are the results calculated by SAMi-J interactions. The straight lines correspond to the results of the fits. The shaded areas with blue and green colors present the experimental data for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ , respectively. Panel (b), correlation between the symmetry energy J and the slope parameter L at density of 0.16${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ given by SAMi-J interactions, the shaded area is the constrained result for symmetry energy and slope parameter.It is well known that the average density of finite nuclei is less than the saturation density. For example, the average density of
$ ^{208} {\rm{Pb}}$ is about 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . And thus the properties of heavy nuclei most effectively probe the properties of nuclear matter around 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ rather than at saturation density. It has been shown that the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei is uniquely fixed by the symmetry energy slope L($ \rho_c $ ) at a subsaturation cross density$ \rho_c $ = 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ [41, 42]. In Refs.[49, 50], the monopole resonance energies of heavy nuclei have been shown to be well constrained by the equation of states of nuclear matter at$ \rho_c $ = 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ rather than at saturation density. So this paragraph is devoted to constrain the density dependence of symmetry energy at density of$ \rho_c $ = 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . In Fig. 3, the similar results are presented as in Fig. 2, but the slope parameters and the values of symmetry energy are calculated at$ \rho_c $ = 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . It can be seen from Fig. 3 (a) that the calculated EWSR percentages also show very good linear function of the slope parameters calculated at 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . It means that the EWSR percentage is also very sensitive to the density dependence of symmetry energy at 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . Together with the experimental data, the constrained slope parameter L is to be in the interval 41.6–67.8 MeV for$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ and 35.8–66.2 MeV for$ ^{132} {\rm{Sn}}$ . From the overlapped area, one get the slope parameter L($ \rho_c $ ) at 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ is in the range of 41.6–66.2 MeV. In Fig. 3 (b), the good linear correlation of symmetry energies J($ \rho_c $ ) and its slope parameters L($ \rho_c $ ) of SAMi-J interactions at nuclear subsaturation density is shown. We can deduce the value of symmetry energy from the obtained range of slope parameter, it is in the range of 23.1–23.9 MeV.Figure 3. (color online) The same as in Fig. 2, but for the density of 0.11
${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ .Effect of pairing correlation on the strength distribution of
$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ is ignored in previous study, we shall discuss the effect of pairing correlation on the results of$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ . It shall give some changes in final results of the density dependence of symmetry energy. As discussed in Refs. [52, 53], the pairing correlation enhances the low energy dipole strength in neutron-rich nucleus$ ^{22} {\rm{O}}$ compared to the results of no pairing calculations. For$ ^{68} {\rm{Ni}}$ , we get similar results for pygmy dipole states. The pygmy dipole strength is slightly enhanced by including pairing correlations for all SAMi-J interactions. The calculated percentages of energy-weighted sum rules for each interactions are slightly larger that the values of no pairing. This features are depicted in Fig. 4, Fig. 4 (a) and (b) are the results for densities 0.11${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ and 0.16${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ , respectively. The blue (green) symbols and lines have the same meaning as in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, the red symbols and lines are the results for considering pairing. Together with the results given by considering pairing, we can see that the extracted slope parameter is shifted down slightly. The value is in between of 39.3-64.1 MeV (41.8-90.2 MeV) for density 0.11 (0.16)${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ . The corresponding symmetry energy is in 23.0-23.8 MeV (28.0-32.5 MeV) for density 0.11 (0.16)${\rm{fm}} ^{-3} $ .
Constraining Symmetry Energy from Pygmy Dipole Resonances in 68Ni and 132Sn
- Received Date: 2024-09-13
- Available Online: 2025-03-01
Abstract: We make a new investigation on the correlation at saturation (subsaturation) density between the density dependence of symmetry energy and the percentage of energy-weighted sum rule (EWSR) exhausted by the pygmy dipole resonances (PDR) in 68Ni and 132Sn. The calculations are performed within Skyrme HF (or HF+BCS) plus random phase approximation (RPA) (or quasiparticle RPA) by using SAMi-J effective interactions. The effect of pairing on the dipole strength distribution of 68Ni and the density dependence of symmetry energy is discussed. The slope parameter L and symmetry energy J at saturation (subsaturation) density are 41.8-90.2 MeV (39.3-64.1 MeV) and 28.0-32.5 MeV (23.0-23.8 MeV). They are consistent with the currently accepted values except for the symmetry energy J at subsaturation density, it is slightly smaller than the data from nuclear mass differences and electric dipole polarizability.