# Reduction of PDF uncertainty in the measurement of the weak mixing angle at the ATLAS experiment

• We investigate the parton distribution function (PDF) uncertainty in the measurement of the effective weak mixing angle $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The PDF-induced uncertainty is large in proton-proton collisions at the LHC due to the dilution effect. The measurement of the Drell-Yan forward-backward asymmetry ($A_{\rm FB}$) at the LHC can be used to reduce the PDF uncertainty in the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ measurement. However, when including the full mass range of lepton pairs in the $A_{\rm FB}$ data analysis, the correlation between the PDF updating procedure and the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ extraction leads to a sizable bias in the obtained $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ value. From our studies, we find that the bias can be significantly reduced by removing Drell-Yan events with invariant mass around the Z-pole region, while most of the sensitivity in reducing the PDF uncertainty remains. Furthermore, the lepton charge asymmetry in the W boson events as a function of the rapidity of the charged leptons, $A_\pm(\eta_\ell)$, is known to be another observable which can be used to reduce the PDF uncertainty in the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ measurement. The constraint from $A_\pm(\eta_\ell)$ is complementary to that from $A_{\rm FB}$, and thus no bias affects the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ extraction. The studies are performed using the error PDF Updating Method Package (ePump), which is based on Hessian updating methods. In this article, the CT14HERA2 PDF set is used as an example.
•  [1] G. Abbiendi et al. (LEP Collaborations ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL; SLD Collaboration, LEP Electronweak Working Group; SLD Electroweak and Heavy Flavor Groups), Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006 [2] J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2219 (1977 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.2219 [3] T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF and D0 Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 97, 112007 (2018 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.112007 [4] A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 701 (2018 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6148-7 [5] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 11, 190 (2015), arXiv:1509.07645[hep-ex doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2015)190 [6] ATLAS public note at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2018-037/ [7] A. Bodek, J.-Y. Han, A. Khukhunaishvili et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 115 (2016 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3958-3 [8] M. Aaboud, G. Aad et al. (ATLAS collaboration), J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 59 (2017 doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)059 [9] R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B 867, 244 (2013 doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003 [10] S. Dulat, T. J. Hou, J. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. D 93(3), 033006 (2016 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006 [11] T. J. Hou, S. Dulat, J. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. D 95(3), 034003 (2017 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034003 [12] W. T. Giele and S. Keller, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094023 (1998 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.094023 [13] R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B 849, 112 (2011) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 854, 926 (2012)] Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 855, 927 (2012)] doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.03.017, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.024, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.09.011 [14] R. D. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. B 855, 608 (2012 doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.018 [15] C. Schmidt, J. Pumplin, and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094005 (2018 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.094005 [16] H. Paukkunen and P. Zurita, JHEP 1412, 100 (2014 doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2014)100 [17] S. Camarda et al. (HERAFitter developers’ Team), Eur. Phys. J. C 75(9), 458 (2015 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3655-7 [18] C. Balázs and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5558-5583 (1997 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.5558 [19] F. Landry, R. Brock, P. M. Nadolsky et al., Phys. Rev. D 67, 073016 (2003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.073016 [20] P. Sun, J. Isaacson, C. P. Yuan et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33(11), 1841006 (2018 doi: 10.1142/S0217751X18410063 [21] C. Willis, R. Brock, D. Hayden et al., Phys. Rev. D 99(5), 054004 (2019 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.054004 [22] G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 760 (2019 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7199-0 [23] J. Pumplin, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034002 (2009 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.034002

Figures(12) / Tables(11)

Get Citation
Yao Fu, Siqi Yang, Minghui Liu, Liang Han, Tie-Jiun Hou, Carl Schmidt, Chen Wang and C.–P. Yuan. Reduction of PDF uncertainty in the measurement of the weak mixing angle at the ATLAS experiment[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abe36d
Yao Fu, Siqi Yang, Minghui Liu, Liang Han, Tie-Jiun Hou, Carl Schmidt, Chen Wang and C.–P. Yuan. Reduction of PDF uncertainty in the measurement of the weak mixing angle at the ATLAS experiment[J]. Chinese Physics C.
Milestone
Article Metric

Article Views(112)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
###### 通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
• 1.

沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

Title:
Email:

## Reduction of PDF uncertainty in the measurement of the weak mixing angle at the ATLAS experiment

• 1. Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Jinzhai Road 96, Hefei 230026, China
• 2. Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
• 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA

Abstract: We investigate the parton distribution function (PDF) uncertainty in the measurement of the effective weak mixing angle $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The PDF-induced uncertainty is large in proton-proton collisions at the LHC due to the dilution effect. The measurement of the Drell-Yan forward-backward asymmetry ($A_{\rm FB}$) at the LHC can be used to reduce the PDF uncertainty in the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ measurement. However, when including the full mass range of lepton pairs in the $A_{\rm FB}$ data analysis, the correlation between the PDF updating procedure and the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ extraction leads to a sizable bias in the obtained $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ value. From our studies, we find that the bias can be significantly reduced by removing Drell-Yan events with invariant mass around the Z-pole region, while most of the sensitivity in reducing the PDF uncertainty remains. Furthermore, the lepton charge asymmetry in the W boson events as a function of the rapidity of the charged leptons, $A_\pm(\eta_\ell)$, is known to be another observable which can be used to reduce the PDF uncertainty in the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ measurement. The constraint from $A_\pm(\eta_\ell)$ is complementary to that from $A_{\rm FB}$, and thus no bias affects the $\sin^2 \theta _{{\rm{eff}}}^{\ell}$ extraction. The studies are performed using the error PDF Updating Method Package (ePump), which is based on Hessian updating methods. In this article, the CT14HERA2 PDF set is used as an example.

Reference (23)

/