# Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice

• The strangeonium-like $s\bar{s}g$ hybrids are investigated from lattice QCD in the quenched approximation. In the Coulomb gauge, spatially extended operators are constructed for $1^{--}$ and $(0,1,2)^{-+}$ states with the color octet $s\bar{s}$ component being separated from the chromomagnetic field strength by spatial distances $r$, whose matrix elements between the vacuum and the corresponding states are interpreted as Bethe-Salpeter (BS) wave functions. In each of the $(1,2)^{-+}$ channels, the masses and the BS wave functions are reliably derived. The $1^{-+}$ ground state mass is around 2.1-2.2 GeV, and that of $2^{-+}$ is around 2.3-2.4 GeV, while the masses of the first excited states are roughly 1.4 GeV higher. This mass splitting is much larger than the expectation of the phenomenological flux-tube model or constituent gluon model for hybrids, which is usually a few hundred MeV. The BS wave functions with respect to $r$ show clear radial nodal structures of non-relativistic two-body system, which imply that $r$ is a meaningful dynamical variable for these hybrids and motivate a color halo picture of hybrids that the color octet $s\bar{s}$ is surrounded by gluonic degrees of freedom. In the $1^{--}$ channel, the properties of the lowest two states comply with those of $\phi(1020)$ and $\phi(1680)$. We have not obtained convincing information relevant to $\phi(2170)$ yet, however, we argue that whether $\phi(2170)$ is a conventional $s\bar{s}$ meson or a $s\bar{s}g$ hybrid within the color halo scenario, the ratio of partial decay widths $\Gamma(\phi \eta)$ and $\Gamma (\phi \eta')$ observed by BESIII can be understood by the mechanism of hadronic transition of a strangeonium-like meson along with the $\eta-\eta'$ mixing.
•  [1] N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, (2019), arXiv: 1907.07583[hep-ex]. [2] P. Lacock, C. Michael, P. Boyle, and P. Rowland (UKQCD), Phys. Lett. B 401, 308 (1997), arXiv:heplat/9611011 doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00384-5 [3] J. J. Dudek, Phys. Rev. D 84, 074023 (2011), arXiv:1106.5515[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074023 [4] L. Liu, G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas, P. Vilaseca, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, B. Joo, and D. G. Richards (Hadron Spectrum), JHEP 07, 126 (2012), arXiv:1204.5425[hep-ph [5] M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D98, 030001 (2018) [6] S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Lett. B625, 212 (2005), arXiv:hepph/0507025[hep-ph [7] B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 74, 091103 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0610018 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.091103 [8] M. Ablikim et al. (BES), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102003 (2008), arXiv:0712.1143[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.102003 [9] C. Shen et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 80, 031101 (2009), arXiv:0808.0006[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.031101 [10] D. Horn and J. Mandula, Phys. Rev. D 17, 898 (1978) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.898 [11] N. Isgur, R. Kokoski, and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 869 (1985) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.869 [12] K. Juge, J. Kuti, and C. Morningstar, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 63, 326 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9709131 doi: 10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00759-7 [13] K. Juge, J. Kuti, and C. Morningstar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4400 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9902336 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4400 [14] E. Braaten, C. Langmack, and D. H. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014044 (2014), arXiv:1402.0438[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014044 [15] P. Guo, A. P. Szczepaniak, G. Galata, A. Vassallo, and E. Santopinto, Phys. Rev. D 77, 056005 (2008), arXiv:0707.3156[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.056005 [16] P. Guo, A. P. Szczepaniak, G. Galata, A. Vassallo, and E. Santopinto, Phys. Rev. D 78, 056003 (2008), arXiv:0807.2721[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.056003 [17] P. Guo, T. Ypez-Martnez, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 89, 116005 (2014), arXiv:1402.5863[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.116005 [18] P. Lacock, C. Michael, P. Boyle, and P. Rowland (UKQCD), Phys. Rev. D54, 6997 (1996), arXiv:heplat/9605025[hep-lat [19] C. W. Bernard et al. (MILC), Phys. Rev. D56, 7039 (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9707008[hep-lat [20] X. Liao and T. Manke, (2002), arXiv: hep-lat/0210030 [hep-lat]. [21] C. Bernard, T. Burch, E. B. Gregory, D. Toussaint, C. E. DeTar, J. Osborn, S. A. Gottlieb, U. M. Heller, and R. Sugar, Phys. Rev. D68, 074505 (2003), arXiv:heplat/0301024[hep-lat [22] Z.-H. Mei and X.-Q. Luo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18, 5713 (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0206012[hep-lat [23] J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 262001 (2009), arXiv:0909.0200[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.262001 [24] Y.-B. Yang, Y. Chen, G. Li, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D86, 094511 (2012), arXiv:1202.2205[hep-ph [25] J. J. Dudek and E. Rrapaj, Phys. Rev. D78, 094504 (2008), arXiv:0809.2582[hep-ph [26] J. J. Dudek, R. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D79, 094504 (2009), arXiv:0902.2241[hep-ph [27] Y. Ma, W. Sun, Y. Chen, M. Gong, and Z. Liu, (2019), arXiv: 1910.09819[hep-lat]. [28] C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D60, 034509 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9901004[hep-lat [29] Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D73, 014516 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0510074[hep-lat [30] S.-q. Su, L.-m. Liu, X. Li, and C. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A21, 1015 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0412034[hep-lat [31] Y.-B. Yang, Y. Chen, L.-C. Gui, C. Liu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Liu, J.-P. Ma, and J.-B. Zhang (CLQCD), Phys. Rev. D87, 014501 (2013), arXiv:1206.2086[hep-lat [32] C. Davies, E. Follana, I. Kendall, G. Lepage, and C. McNeile (HPQCD), Phys. Rev. D 81, 034506 (2010), arXiv:0910.1229[hep-lat doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034506 [33] G. S. Bali, Phys. Rept. 343, 1 (2001), arXiv:hepph/0001312 doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00079-X [34] G.-J. Ding and M.-L. Yan, Phys. Lett. B 650, 390 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611319 doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.05.026 [35] N. Akbar and S. Noor, (2020), arXiv: 2005.02626[hepph]. [36] J. Lees et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 86, 012008 (2012), arXiv:1103.3001[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.012008 [37] M. Ablikim et al. (BESⅢ), Phys. Rev. D 100, 032009 (2019), arXiv:1907.06015[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.032009 [38] M. Ablikim et al. (BESⅢ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 112001 (2020), arXiv:2001.04131[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.112001 [39] M. Ablikim et al. (BESⅢ), Phys. Rev. D 102, 012008 (2020), arXiv:2003.13064[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.012008 [40] M. Ablikim et al. (BESⅢ), Phys. Rev. D 99, 032001 (2019), arXiv:1811.08742[hep-ex doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.032001

Figures(6) / Tables(5)

Get Citation
Yunheng Ma, Ying Chen, Ming Gong and Zhaofeng Liu. Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice[J]. Chinese Physics C.
Yunheng Ma, Ying Chen, Ming Gong and Zhaofeng Liu. Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice[J]. Chinese Physics C.
Milestone
Article Metric

Article Views(15)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
###### 通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
• 1.

沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

Title:
Email:

## Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice

###### Corresponding author: Ying Chen, cheny@ihep.ac.cn
• 1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China
• 2. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China

Abstract: The strangeonium-like $s\bar{s}g$ hybrids are investigated from lattice QCD in the quenched approximation. In the Coulomb gauge, spatially extended operators are constructed for $1^{--}$ and $(0,1,2)^{-+}$ states with the color octet $s\bar{s}$ component being separated from the chromomagnetic field strength by spatial distances $r$, whose matrix elements between the vacuum and the corresponding states are interpreted as Bethe-Salpeter (BS) wave functions. In each of the $(1,2)^{-+}$ channels, the masses and the BS wave functions are reliably derived. The $1^{-+}$ ground state mass is around 2.1-2.2 GeV, and that of $2^{-+}$ is around 2.3-2.4 GeV, while the masses of the first excited states are roughly 1.4 GeV higher. This mass splitting is much larger than the expectation of the phenomenological flux-tube model or constituent gluon model for hybrids, which is usually a few hundred MeV. The BS wave functions with respect to $r$ show clear radial nodal structures of non-relativistic two-body system, which imply that $r$ is a meaningful dynamical variable for these hybrids and motivate a color halo picture of hybrids that the color octet $s\bar{s}$ is surrounded by gluonic degrees of freedom. In the $1^{--}$ channel, the properties of the lowest two states comply with those of $\phi(1020)$ and $\phi(1680)$. We have not obtained convincing information relevant to $\phi(2170)$ yet, however, we argue that whether $\phi(2170)$ is a conventional $s\bar{s}$ meson or a $s\bar{s}g$ hybrid within the color halo scenario, the ratio of partial decay widths $\Gamma(\phi \eta)$ and $\Gamma (\phi \eta')$ observed by BESIII can be understood by the mechanism of hadronic transition of a strangeonium-like meson along with the $\eta-\eta'$ mixing.

Reference (40)

/